Abstract
The traditional theory of mind views it as a metaphysical entity (the soul). This entitative conception was revised by modern cognitive theory viewing it as a function in the head. The shift to a functional view of mind eliminates many difficulties with the entitative approach but elements of the latter persist in locating mind inside the head or brain. This creates many problems including inability to account for the collective creation of artifacts that no individual participant fully understands. Greeno attempts to deal with these issues by shifting a functional, symbol processing approach from the individual to the group level. This analysis focuses primarily on the interaction of external problem representations (knowledge) and participant status or authority (control). The resulting approach offers something new to theories of group problem-solving or learning but ignores individual learning and, in treating authority statically, does not live up to Greeno’s initial goal of synthesizing cognitive and socio-linguistic theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.
Bateson, G. (1972). The logical categories of learning and communication. In Steps to an ecology of mind (pp. 279–308). New York: Ballantine Books.
Bentley, A. F. (1954). The human skin: Philosophy’s last line of defense. Philosophy of Science, 8, 1–19.
Berger, J., Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectations states theory. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
Bredo, E. (2006). Conceptual confusion and educational psychology. In P. Winne, P. Alexander, & G. Phye (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 43–57). Fairfax, VA: Techbooks.
Bruner, J. (1985). Models of the learner. Educational Researcher, 14(6), 5–8.
Cazden, C. (1989). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Clancey, W. J. (1991). A boy scout, toto, and a bird: How situated cognition is different from situated robotics. NATO workshop on emergence, situatedness, subsumption, and symbol grounding.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing for group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1979/1972). What computers can’t do. New York: Harper and Row.
Hare, P. A., Borgatta, E. F., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Small groups: Studies in social interaction. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Jacobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Seboek (Ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Knorr-Cetina, K., & Cicourel, A. V. (1981). Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
McDermott, R. P., & Hood, L. (1982). Institutionalized psychology and the ethnography of schooling. In P. Gilmore & A. Gladthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1976, March). Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19(3), 113–126.
Newman, D., Griffin, P., Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in schools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rich, E. (1983). Artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Snow, R. E. (1992). Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational Psychologist, 27, 5–32.
Strauss, A. (1959). Mirrors and masks; the search for identity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Verba, S. (1961). Small groups and political behavior: A study of leadership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Acknowledgement
I want to thank Ray McDermott for a number of helpful criticisms and suggestions
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bredo, E. (2011). The Interaction of Content and Control in Group Problem Solving and Learning. In: Koschmann, T. (eds) Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7582-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7582-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7581-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7582-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)