Skip to main content

Representational Competence: A Commentary on the Greeno Analysis of Classroom Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice

Abstract

In his analysis of the classroom videos, Greeno provides a theoretical basis for analyzing classroom interactions. He advances the notion of empowering students by positioning them with the authority, accountability, and competence to problematize issues and reconcile differences among themselves. This commentary focuses on the different aspects of representational competence that the students were grappling with in the lesson analyzed and that students need to develop in order to be skilled in mathematical and scientific reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Warnock, E. H., Aiello, N., & Miller, M. L. (1975). Reasoning from incomplete knowledge. In D. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 383–415). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (2002a). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (2002b). Students’ criteria for representational adequacy. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 105–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feurzeig, W., & Roberts, N. (1999). Modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandinach, E. B., & Cline, H. F. (1994). Classroom dynamics: Implementing a technology-based learning environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1995). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology, 35, 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995) The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repenning, A., & Sumner, T. (1995). AgentSheets: A medium for creating domain-oriented visual languages. IEEE Computer, 28(3), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems perspective to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Collins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collins, A. (2011). Representational Competence: A Commentary on the Greeno Analysis of Classroom Practice. In: Koschmann, T. (eds) Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7582-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics