Skip to main content

Reflections on Practice, Teaching/Learning, Video, and Theorizing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice

Abstract

If social interaction is the site of learning and of teaching practice, how might we better conceive of “interaction” and “practice”? This chapter argues that studies of learning, as situated in interaction, have suffered from inadequate theorizing concerning the nature of interaction itself. The chapter begins with a brief overview of the sixty year intellectual history of an “interaction revolution” that parallels the “cognitive revolution” reviewed by McDermott in his chapter. Special attention is given to the perspective developed through the pioneering “Natural History of an Interview” (NHI) research group whose work began in 1956–the first to have studied both verbal and nonverbal aspects of social interaction together in an attempt at a unified analysis–and its successors in an approach called “context analysis.” The chapter continues by documenting the patterns of reference to specific video examples that are apparent in the major papers and commentaries on them that appear in this volume. Reference to video examples differed markedly across authors, both in the particular strips of interaction that were chosen for purposes of illustration and in the ways those strips were discussed across the various chapters, suggesting that the affordances of the video corpus that was made available to authors were not fully taken advantage of in the discussions the authors produced. The chapter concludes by revisiting the need for better theorizing concerning the nature of social interaction itself, as a foundation for attempts to understand learning and teaching as an interactionally situated process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., & Matthier, K. (2004). Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. (1950) Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1956/1972). The message “This is play.” In Schaffner, B. (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 195–242). New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation. Reprinted in G. Bateson, Steps toward an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G., & Mead, M. (1942). Balinese character: A photographic analysis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2004a). Talk and social theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2004b). Origins: A brief intellectual and technological history of the emergence of multimodal discourse analysis. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 196–207). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. Green, G. Camilli, P. Elmore, A. Skukauskaite, & E. Grace (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in educational research (pp. 177–192). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2007). Ways of seeing video: Toward a phenomenology of viewing minimally edited footage. In R. Goldman, B. Barron, R. Pea, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 145–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1997). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 22–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper Colophon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, A., Burke, P., & Cicourel, A. (1994). What’s going on here?: Complementary studies of professional talk. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1969). Listening behavior: Some cultural differences. Phi Delta Kappan, 50, 379–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., & Rubin, A. (1998). There’s five little notches in here: Dilemmas in teaching and learning the conventional structure of rate. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 189–236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 43–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, W. F. (1996). Language and communicative practices, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 2003-013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, G. (ed.) Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, H. (1902/1961). The story of my life. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1999). Special issue: Meaning making. Discourse Processes, 27(2), 98–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, multimedia and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (1976). Kids make sense: An ethnographic account of the interactional management of success and failure in one first grade classroom, unpublished thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuown, N. (Ed.). (1971). The natural history of an interview. University of Chicago, Joseph Regenstein Library, Microfilm Department, Microfilm Collection of Manuscripts on Cultural Anthropology, Series 15, Nos. 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittenger, R., Hockett, C., & Danehy, J. (1960). The first five minutes: A sample of microscopic interview analysis. Ithaca, NY: Martineau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reusch, J., & Kees, W. (1956). Nonverbal communication: Notes on the visual perception of human relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheflen, A. E. (1973a). Communicational structure: Analysis of a psychotherapy transaction. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheflen, A. E. (1973b). How behavior means. New York: Gordon & Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & McClain, K. (Eds.). (2002). Special issue: Analyzing tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2&3), 319–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, verbal categories, and cultural description. In K. Basso & H. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology (pp. 11–56). Albuquerque, NM: School of American Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskin. W. F., & John, V. P. (1963). The study of spontaneous talk. In R. G. Barker & L. S. Barker (Eds.), The stream of behavior (pp. 228–281). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick Erickson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erickson, F. (2011). Reflections on Practice, Teaching/Learning, Video, and Theorizing. In: Koschmann, T. (eds) Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7582-9_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics