Abstract
An important contribution of the chapter by Clancey is that he combines Dewey’s ideas of the transformative nature of learning with a detailed analysis of how students struggle with problems of how to familiarize themselves with intellectual tools such as graphs and concepts in statistics. In the present chapter, it is argued that when analyzing learning, one must consider the institutional character of the activities students are engaged in. Success and failure at learning in schools seem to have to do with mastering specific cultural forms of communication. The plea for multidisciplinarity is commendable, although Clancey’s appeal to neuroscience for understanding how students grapple with scientific representations in class may be questioned. Meaning-making, interaction and learning about representational formats require that the object of inquiry retains its integrity as a human and collective practice of coping with and mastering ideas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burns, A. (1989). The power of the written word. The role of literacy in the history of western civilization. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Cressey, D. (1980). Literacy and social order: Reading and writing in Tudor and Stuart England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54, 77–80.
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. The evolution of human consciousness. New York, NY: Norton.
Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Engelsing, R. (1973). Analphabetentum und Lektüre. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Goodwin, C. (1997). The blackness of black: Color categories as situated practice. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning. Essays on situated cognition (pp. 111–140). Berlin: Springer.
Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge, US: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. Heller, M. Sosna, & D. Wellbery (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism. Autonomy, individuality, and the self in western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford, CA: Stanford university press.
Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hjörne, E., & Säljö, R. (2004). “There is something about Julia”-Symptoms, categories, and the process of invoking ADHD in the Swedish school: A case study. Journal of Learning, Identity and Education, 3, 1–24.
Hjörne, E., & Säljö, R. (2007). Categorizing learners beyond the classroom. In M. Martin-Jones, A. M. de Mejia, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (Vol. 3, pp. 135–146).New York, NY: Springer.
Kramer, S. N. (1981). History begins at Sumer. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In J. Lave & S. Chaiklin (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, MA: University Press.
Maas, U. (2001). Literacy in Germany. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The making of literate societies (pp. 82–100). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Mäkitalo, Å., & Säljö, R. (2002). Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices. Text, 22, 57–82.
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.
Trent, J. W. (1994). Inventing the feeble mind. A history of mental retardation in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in mathematical modeling in the elementary school. Learning and Instruction, 4, 273–294.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.
Yoshida, H., Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Realistic considerations in solving problematic word problems: Do Japanese and Belgian children have the same difficulties? Learning and Instruction, 7, 329–338.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Säljö, R. (2011). On Plants and Textual Representations of Plants: Learning to Reason in Institutional Categories. In: Koschmann, T. (eds) Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7582-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7582-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7581-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7582-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)