Skip to main content

Retaining Knowledge Through Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover How Organizations Remember

Part of the book series: Organizational Change and Innovation ((OCI,volume 2))

  • 840 Accesses

Abstract

At an organizational level, communication is a significant part of knowledge ­retention. For knowledge to be usefully retained at an organizational level, it must be accessible to a significant number of people in the organization. The knowledge, however, is retained more widely as it is communicated. This means that communication mechanisms are also collective knowledge retention structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, P. S. (2002). Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism. In W. C. Chun & N. Bontis (Eds.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (pp. 23–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2002). From “blame by praise” to “praise by blame”. Analysis of Vocal Patterns in Ironic Communication. International Journal of Psychology, 37(5), 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. (1991). The Storytelling Organization: A Study of Story Performance in an Office Supply Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones, A. (1999). Knowledge Capitalism: Business, Work, and Learning in the New Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., & Baird, L. (2000). Technology Is Not Enough: Improving Performance by Building Organizational Memory. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbridge, A., Bernard, J., Blair, D., Butler, S., Peters, P., & Yallop, C. E. (1997). Macquarie Dictionary (3rd ed.). North Ryde: Macquarie Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, S. (2007). The Secret Language of Leadership: How Leaders Action Through Narrative San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (2001). From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy. Boson: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.-N. (1997). Individuals and Environment: A Psychosocial Approach to Workspace (Atkin-Etienne, Ruth, Trans.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (1998). The Use of Stories. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research (pp. 135–160). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardi, P. (1990). Artifacts as Pathways and Remains of Organizational Life. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and Artifacts: Views of the Corporate Landscape (pp. 3–38). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, T. L. (2005). The Strategic Use of Stories in Organizational Communication and Learning. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (1999). An Integrative Perspective for Managing Knowledge. In J. F. Porac & R. Garud (Eds.), Cognition, Knowledge and Organizations (Vol. 6, pp. 195–214). Stamford: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating Action II: Affordances for Interaction: The Social is Material for Design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E. H. (2001). The Idols of Organizational Theory: From Francis Bacon to the Dilbert Principle. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(4), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingery, W. D. (1993). Technological Systems and Some Implications with Regard to Continuity and Change. In S. Lubar & W. D. Kingery (Eds.), History from Things: Essays on Material Culture (pp. 215–230). Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lant, T. K. (1999). A Situated Learning Perspective on the Emergence of Knowledge and Identity in Cognitive Communities. In J. F. Porac & R. Garud (Eds.), Cognition, Knowledge and Organizations (Vol. 6, pp. 171–194). Stamford: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1996). Organizational Learning. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational Learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livio, N., & Rietz, S. A. (1986). Storytelling: Process and Practice. Littledon: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, November–December, 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organizational Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (2002). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. In C. W. Choo & N. Bontis (Eds.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (pp. 437–462). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of "Ba": Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 154–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Reinmoeller, P. (2000). Dynamic Business Systems for Knowledge Creation. In C. Despres & D. Chauvel (Eds.), Knowledge Horizons: The Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management (pp. 89–113). Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). Seci, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33, 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Rotchford, N. L. (1983). Relationships Between Office Characteristics and Employee Reactions: A Study of the Physical Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 542–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. E. (1990). Sharing Knowledge, Celebrating Identity: Community Memory in a Service Culture. In D. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective Remembering (pp. 169–189). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, P. (2010). Locating Space in Qualitative Research: Questioning Culture Through the Corporeal. In M. Savin-Baden & C. H. Major (Eds.), New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty (pp. 121–130). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, P., & Were, P. (2008). Observing Places: Using Space and Material Culture in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 8(5), 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K., & Grabowski, M. (1996). Organizations, Technology and Structuring. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Studies (pp. 409–423). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Schmahmann, K. S. (1990). Building Buildings and Living Lives: A Critique of Bureaucracy, Ideology and Concrete Artifacts. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and Artifacts: Views of the Corporate Landscape (pp. 69–84). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1996). Three Cultures of Management: The Key to the Learning Organization. Sloan Management Review(Fall), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1996). Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational Learning (pp. 58–82). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, A. D. (1996). Putting Group Information Technology in its Place: Communication and Good Work Group Performance. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sole, D., & Edmondson, A. (2002). Bridging Knowledge Gaps: Learning in Geographical Dispersed Cross-Functional Development Teams. In W. C. Chun & N. Bontis (Eds.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (pp. 587–604). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. (1990). Aesthetics and Organizational Skills. In B. A. Turner (Ed.), Organizational Symbolism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trice, H. M. (1993). Occupational Subcultures in the Workplace. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J., & Barley, S. R. (1985). Cultural Organization: Fragments of a Theory. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational Culture (pp. 31–53). Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1994). "Sticky Information" and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in Knowledge Creation. [Electronic Version]. California Management Review, 40, 133–153. Retrieved June 3, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice : Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice: The Structure of Knowledge Stewarding. In C. Despres & D. Chauvel (Eds.), Knowledge Horizons: The Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management (pp. 205–225). Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarraga, C., & Bonache, J. (2005). The Impact of Team Atmosphere on Knowledge Outcomes in Self-Managed Teams. Organization Studies, 26(5), 661–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paddy O’Toole .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Toole, P. (2011). Retaining Knowledge Through Communication. In: How Organizations Remember. Organizational Change and Innovation, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7524-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics