Skip to main content

Detection of Malingering and Invalid Test Results Using the Halstead—Reitan Battery

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Neuropsychology ((CINP))

Abstract

The problem of malingering, dissimulation, or even the nondeliberate production of invalid performances cuts at the core of the scientific basis of clinical practice in neuropsychology. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) cautions that malingering should be strongly suspected if an examination is done in a medicolegal context (e.g., the client was referred by an attorney for an evaluation). Binder (1990), in his review of forensic cases, stated that malingering should be considered a possibility whenever the test results may be related to an opportunity for financial gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( 4th ed. ). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, H. (1930). An experiment in the measurement of mental deterioration. Archives of Psychology, 18, 5 – 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M. (1990). Malingering following minor head trauma. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4, 25 – 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M. (1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 104 – 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullum, C., Heaton, R. K., & Grant, I. (1991). Psychogenic factors influencing neuropsychological performance: Somatoform disorders, factitious disorders, and malingering. In H. O. Doerr & A. S. Carlin (Eds.), Forensic neuropsychology: Legal and scientific bases (pp. 141 – 171 ). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., Ziskin, J., & Hiers, J. B. (1991). Brain damage claims: Coping with neuropsychological evidence. Vol. 1. The scientific and professional literature. Los Angeles: Law and Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, M. D., Iverson, G. I., & McCracken, L. M. (1990). The detection of malingering in neuropsychological assessment. Neuropsychology Review, 1, 247 – 279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, R. A. (1983). Detection of faking on the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 731 – 742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Smith, H. H., Jr., Lehman, R. A. W., & Vogt, A. T. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 892 – 900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J., & Reitan, R. M. (1982). Effect of lateralized cerebral damage upon contralateral and ipsilateral sensorimotor performances. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J., & Reitan, R. M. (1984). Neuropsychological correlates of rapidly vs. slowly growing intrinsic neoplasms. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, H. F. (1943). A practical clinical test for organic brain damage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 27, 375 – 386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittenberg, W., Rotholc, A., Russell, E., & Heilbronner, R. (1996). Identification of malingered head injury on the Halstead-Reitan Battery. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 271 – 281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nies, K. J., & Sweet, J. J. (1994). Neuropsychological assessment and malingering: A critical review of past and present strategies. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 501–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1955). Affective disturbances in brain-damaged patients: Measurements with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 73, 530–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1964). Psychological deficits resulting from cerebral lesions in man. In J. M. Warren & K. A. Akert (Eds.), The frontal granular cortex and behavior (pp. 295 – 312 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1967). Psychological assessment of deficits associated with brain lesions in subjects with normal and subnormal intelligence. In J. L. Khanna (Ed.), Brain damage and mental retardation: A psychological evaluation (pp. 137 – 159 ). Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Fitzhugh, K. B. (1971). Behavioral deficits in groups with cerebral vascular lesions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37, 215 – 223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1988). Traumatic brain injury: Vol. 11. Recovery and rehabilitation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1989). The Seashore Rhythm Test and brain functions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 70 – 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation ( 2nd ed. ). Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1995a). The Category Test and the Trail Making Test as measures of frontal lobe functions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 50 – 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1995b). Consistency of responses on retesting among head-injured subjects in litigation versus head-injured subjects not in litigation. Applied Neuropsychology, 2, 67 – 71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1996). The question of validity of neuropsychological test scores among head-injured litigants: Development of a Dissimulation Index. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 573–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1997). Consistency of neuropsychological test scores of head-injured subjects involved in litigation compared with head-injured subjects not involved in litigation: Development of the Retest Consistency Index. The Clinical Psychologist, II, 69 – 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueblood, W., & Schmidt, M. (1993). Malingering and other validity considerations in the neuropsychological evaluation of mild head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 578 – 590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler. D. (1955). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reitan, R.M., Wolfson, D. (1998). Detection of Malingering and Invalid Test Results Using the Halstead—Reitan Battery. In: Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation. Critical Issues in Neuropsychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7469-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7469-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7468-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7469-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics