Skip to main content

Patriarchal Chimpanzees, Matriarchal Bonobos: Potential Ecological Causes of a Pan Dichotomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Primates of Gashaka

Part of the book series: Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects ((DIPR,volume 35))

Abstract

Chimpanzees and bonobos, despite being closely related hominoid primates, differ in female gregariousness and dominance style. Violent male aggression is not atypical in chimpanzee societies and is vented against both other males and females in intra- as well as inter-group conflicts; relationships amongst females are rather weak. Bonobo societies, on the other hand, are female-centred; reports[Comp1] about inter-group conflict are rare to absent but there are numerous reports of blood-drawing injuries inflicted upon males by coalitions of females.

This dichotomy is of potential interest for the understanding of social dynamics in contemporary human societies, too, given that Pan and Homo shared a last ­common ancestor 5 – 6 million years ago. For example, political agendas to achieve a greater equality of the sexes might have to work against our natural inclinations, if the last common ancestor exhibited the patriarchal tendencies found in chimpanzees. Vice versa, if the last common ancestor possessed the matriarchal tendencies of bonobos, then patriarchal tendencies in contemporary human societies could be understood as rather recent cultural developments that can be more easily undone by counter-measures, i.e., changes in socio-economic dynamics.

Such assertions are not unproblematic, given millions of years of evolution. Nevertheless, a reconstruction of the ancestral roots of the behavioural suites of Homo and Pan will have to rely on a causal understanding of the different species psychologies of chimpanzees versus bonobos. These should in some ways be related to ecology. Both species have a mixed diet dominated by fruit with a similar composition. To test if their diet differs in availability and quality, we collected data on habitat phenology and analysed nutritional content of food plants and non-food plants from a community of bonobos in Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo, and a community of chimpanzees living in Gashaka Gumti National Park / Nigeria.

We found that chimpanzee diet is more diverse, whereas bonobos can rely on a few staple species for longer periods of time – which reflects the more seasonal climate at the chimpanzee site. Both species prefer fruit with elevated contents of water, sugar and fat, but chimpanzees have to cope with much higher levels of anti-feedants such as tannins. Moreover, only bonobos have access to a herb with low levels of fibre but high protein. In addition, chimpanzees invest more time and energy in the removal of seeds from fruit and in digestion. The costs of acquisition of high quality food are thus higher in chimpanzees than in bonobos. The greater constraints in terms of food availability and quality are reflected in greater levels of female-female competition as evidenced by consistently lower levels of gregariousness in chimpanzees measured through the size of nest groups.

Thus, local ecologies can modify social behaviours. However, support for the hypothesis that ecological differences are at the heart of the dichotomy of sociality in Pan is not unequivocal because of considerable intra-specific variability throughout the geographical range of bonobos and, in particular, chimpanzees with respect to social processes and fluctuating parameters of flora, fauna and climate. Accordingly, future studies will have to explore the extent of this flexibility and if and how it covaries with local ecologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  • Alm, U., Birgersson, B. & Leimar, O. (2000). The effect of food quality and relative abundance on food choice in fallow deer. Animal Behaviour 64: 439–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, S. A. (1998). Foraging for Survival. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. P., Nordheim, E. V., Boesch, C. & Moermond, T. C. (2002). Factors influencing fission-fusion grouping in chimpanzees in the Taï National Park, Cote d’Ivoire. In Boesch, C., Hohmann, G. & Marchant, L. F. (eds.), Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–101.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Badrian, N. L. & Malenky, R. K. (1984). Feeding ecology of Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire. In Susman, L. S. (ed.), The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 275–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. (2006). Vergleichende Faecesuntersuchungen bei Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes vellerosus und Pan troglodytes verus. Diplomarbeit, Humboldt-Universität Berlin / Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky, G. E. (1978). Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theoretical Population Biology 14: 105–134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhoudt, K., Fruth, B. & Garber, P. A. (2005). Food Patch Choice of Bonobos (Pan paniscus) in Lui Kotal, the Democratic Republic of Congo. Poster presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, April 6–9, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, C. & Boesch-Achermann, H. (2000). The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest. Behavioural Ecology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, C., Hohmann, G. & Marchant, L. F. (eds.) (2002). Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., Mackinnon, K. C., Panger, M. & Bearder, S. K. (Hg.) (2007). Primates in Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Arceiz, A., Takatsuki, S. & Lhagvasuren, B. (2004). Food overlap between Mongolian gazelles and livestock in Omnogobi, southern Mongolia. Ecological Research 19: 455–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, T. A., Collazo, J. A. & Groom, M. J. (2003). Avian fruit preferences across a Puerto Rican forest landscape: pattern consistency and implications for seed removal. Oecologia 134: 119–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. A., White, F. J. & Wrangham, R. W. (1994). Party size in chimpanzees and bonobos: a reevaluation of theory based on two similarly forested sites. In Wrangham, R. W., McGrew, W. C., de Waal, F. B. M. & Heltne, P. G. (eds.), Chimpanzee Cultures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M. & Lechner-Doll, M. (2001). Differences in selective reticulo-ruminal particle retention as a key factor in ruminant diversification. Oecologia 129: 321–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M. (2003). Tannins in the nutrition of wild animals: a review. In Fidgett, A., Clauss, M., Gansloser, U., Hatt, J. M. & Nijboer, J. (eds.), Zoo Animal Nutrition, Volume 2. Fürth: Filander Verlag, pp. 53–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Lechner-Doll, M. & Streich, W. J. (2002). Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser / grazer from the other end. Oecologia 131: 343–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, M., Lason, K., Gehrke, J., Lechner-Doll, M., Fickel, J., Grune, T. & Streich, W. J. (2003). Captive roe dee (Capreolus capreolus) select for low amounts of tannin acid but not quebracho: fluctuation of preferences and potential benefits. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B 136: 369–382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin-Brittain, N. L., Wrangham, R. W. & Hunt, K. D. (1998). Dietary response of chimpanzees and Cercopithecines to seasonal variation in fruit abundance. II. Macro-nutrients. International Journal of Primatology 19: 971–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlett, R. T. & Lucas, P. W. (1990). Alternative seed-handling strategies in primates: seed-spitting by long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Oecologia 82: 166–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. B. M. & Lanting, F. 1997. Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, M. D. & Schall, J. J. (1992). Testing models of diet assembly by the generalist herbivore lizard, Cnemidophorus murinus. Ecology 73: 845–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. [1949] (1973). The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deblauwe, I. & Janssens, G. P. J. (2007). New insights in insect prey choice by chimpanzees and gorillas in southeast Cameroon: the role of nutritional value. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 135: 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eller, C. (2000). The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory. Why an Invented Past Won’t Give Women a Future. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. M. (1966). The role of time and energy in food preferences. The American Naturalist 100: 611–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldsa, J. & Lovett, J. C. (1997). Geographical patterns of old and young species in African forest biota: the significance of specific montane areas as evolutionary centres. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. (2006). Socio-ecology of Nigerian Chimpanzees at Gashaka. PhD thesis, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A & Sommer, V. (2007). Subsistence technology in Nigerian chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology 28: 997–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, W. J. & Janzen, D. H. (1974). Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. The American Naturalist 108: 269–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fruth, B. (1995). Nests and Nest Groups in Wild Bonobos (Pan paniscus): Ecological and Behavioural Correlates. Aachen: Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruth, B. & Hohmann, G. (1996). Nest building behaviour in the great apes: the great leap ­forward? In McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F. & Nishida, T. (eds.), Great Ape Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–240.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fruth, B. & Hohmann, G. (2006). Social grease for females? Same-sex genital contacts in wild bonobos. In Sommer, V. & Vasey, P. (eds.), Homosexual Behaviour in Animals: Evolutionary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 294–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerloff, U., Hartung, B., Fruth, B., Hohmann, G. & Tautz, D. (1999). Intracommunity relationships, dispersal pattern and paternity success in a wild living community of bonobos (Pan paniscus) determined from DNA analysis of faecal samples. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 266: 1189–1195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. (1993). Why Men Rule. Chicago, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbourne, J. B. (1993). Introduction to Ecological Biochemistry. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, A. H. & Stewart, K. J. (2007). Gorilla Society: Conflict, Compromise, and Cooperation Between the Sexes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, C., Suzuki, S., Takenoshita, Y., Yamagiwa, J., Basabose, A. K. & Furuichi, T. (2004). How fruit abundance affects the chimpanzee party size: a comparison between four study sites. Primates 44: 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heltne, P. G. & Marquardt, L. A. (eds.) (1989). Understanding Chimpanzees. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk, C. K., Wantia, J. & Isler, K. (2008). Female dominance over males in primates: Self-organisation and sexual dimorphism. PLoS ONE 3: e2678.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hladik, C. M. (1977). A comparative study of the feeding strategies of two sympatric species of leaf monkeys: Presbytis senex and Presbytis entellus. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.), Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes. London: Academic Press, pp. 323–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, G. & Fruth, B. (1995). Loud calls in great apes: sex differences and social correlates. In Zimmermann, E., Newman, J. D. & Jürgens, U. (eds.), Current Topics in Primate Vocal Communication. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 161–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, G. & Fruth, B. (2003a). Lui Kotal – a new site for field research on bonobos in the Salonga National Park. Pan African News 10: 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, G. & Fruth, B. (2003b). Intra- and inter-sexual aggression by bonobos in the context of mating. Behaviour 140: 1389–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, G., Sommer, V. & Ortmann, S. (2007). What’s on the menue? Variation in nutritional ecology of bonobos and chimpanzees. Abstract. (Italy Conference).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, G., Fowler, A., Sommer, V. & Ortmann, S. (2006). Frugivory and gregariousness of Salonga bonobos and Gashaka chimpanzees: the abundance and nutritional quality of fruit. In Hohmann, G. (ed.), Feeding Ecology of Apes and Other Primates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann, G. & Fruth, B. (2008). New records on prey capture and meat eating by bonobos at Lui Kotale, Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. Folia Primatologica 79:103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, T. (1992). The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamani, R. & Mahaney, W. C. (2000). Geophagy among primates: adaptive significance and ecological consequences. Animal Behaviour 59: 899–915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, H. (1971). Primate Societies. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J. E. (1998). Primate digestion: interactions among anatomy, physiology, and feeding ecology. Evolutionary Anthropology 7: 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J. E. (2006). Primate nutritional ecology: feeding biology and diet at ecological and evolutionary scales. In Campbell, C., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M. & Bearder, S. (eds.), Primates in Perspective. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 482–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, E. G. & Windsor, D. M. (1982). Forest production and regulation of primary consumers on Barro Colorado Island. In Stanley Rand, A., Windsor, D. M. & Leigh, E. G. (eds.), The Ecology of a Tropical Forest: Seasonal Rhythms and Long-term Changes. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, M. (1993). Modeling dietary selectivity by Bornean orangutans: evidence for integration of multiple criteria in fruit selection. International Journal of Primatology 14: 257–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz, C. N. & Nicolson, S. W. (1996). Sugar preference of a nectarivorous passerine bird, the lesser double-collared sunbird (Nectarinia chalybea). Functional Ecology 10: 360–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makkar, H. P. S. & Becker, K. (1998). Do tannins in leaves of trees and shrubs from African and Himalayan regions differ in level and activity? Agroforestry Systems 40: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makkar, H. P. S., Bluemmel, M., Borowy, N. K. & Becker, K. (1993). Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 61: 161–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malenky, R. (1990). Ecological Factors Affecting Food Choice and Social Organization in Pan paniscus. PhD thesis, State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malenky, R. K. & Stiles, E. W. (1991). Distribution of terrestrial herbaceous vegetation and its consumption by Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire. American Journal of Primatology 23: 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto-Oda, A. & Hayashi, Y. (1999). Nutritional aspects of fruit choice by chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica 70: 154–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, W. C. (2004). The Cultured Chimpanzee: Reflections on Cultural Primatology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F. & Nishida, T. (eds.) (1996). Great Ape Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., Beuerlein, M. M., Vrancken, D., Fruth, B. & Hohmann, G. (2007). Prospects for bonobo insectivory: Lui Kotal, Democratic Republic of Congo. International Journal of Primatology 28: 1237–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (ed.) (2002). Eat or be Eaten: Predator Sensitive Foraging Among Primates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (1978). Behavioral adaptations to leaf-eating by the mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata). In Montgomery, G. G. (ed.), Ecology of Arboreal Folivores. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Press, pp. 535–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (1981). Food choice and digestive strategies of two sympatric primate species. The American Naturalist 117: 476–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. & McBee, R. H. (1983). Rates of fermentative digestion in the howler monkey (Alouatta palliate) (Primates: Cebidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 7: 4–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C., Watts, D. P. & Lwanga, J. S. (2002). Ecological and social correlates of chimpanzee party size and composition. In Boesch C., Hohmann, G. & Marchant L. F. (eds.), Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–111.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, P. A., Moore, J. J., Chakraborty, R., Jin, L., Goodall, J. & Woodruff, D. (1994). Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees. Science 265: 1193–1201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Harvey, I. & McAllan, A. B. (1992). Tannins, their biochemistry and nutritional properties. Advances in Plant Cell Biochemistry and Biotechnology 1: 151–217.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, C. L. & Altizer, S. (2006). Infectious Diseases in Primates: Behavior, Ecology and Evolution. (Oxford Series in Ecology & Evolution). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, J. F., Bergl, R. A. & Linder, J. M. (2004). Africa’s Gulf of Guinea Forests: Biodiversity Patterns and Conservation Priorities. (Advances in Applied Biodiversity Science 6). Washington, DC: Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, A. R. (1994). Sex and food control in the “uncommon chimpanzee”: How bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. Ethology and Sociobiology 15: 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish, A. R. (1996). Female relationships in bonobos (Pan paniscus): evidence for bonding, cooperation, and female dominance in a male-philopatric species. Human Nature 7: 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, A. R. & de Waal, F. (2000). The other “closest living relative”. How bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra- and intersexual interactions, and hominid evolution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 907: 97–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2007). Swingers. Bonobos are celebrated as peace-loving, matriarchal, and sexually liberated. Are they? The New Yorker July 30: 48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppi, D., Norton, B., Minson, D. & Hendricksen, R. (1980). The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science Camb. 94: 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. J., Hrstich, L. N. & Chan, B. G. (1986). The conversion of procyanadins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25: 223–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, B., Wright, S. J., Lefebvrev, G. & Calderon, O. (1999). Interspecific synchrony and asynchrony in the fruiting phenologies of congeneric bird-dispersed plants in Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15: 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raubenheimer, D. & Simpson, S. J. (1997). Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebrates. Nutritional Research Reviews 10: 151–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remis, M. J. (2002). Food preferences among captive western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). International Journal of Primatology 23: 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, V. (2005). The Chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, V., Plumptre, A. J., Greenham, J. & Harborne, J. (1998). Condensed tannins and sugars in the diet of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Budongo Forest, Uganda. Oecologia 115: 331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. M. (2007). Gorillas: Diversity in ecology and behavior. In Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., Bearder, S. K. (eds.), Primates Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S. (2002). Plants of the apes: is there a hominoid model for the origins of the hominoid diet? In Ungar, P. S. & Teaford, M. F. (eds.), Human Diet: Its Origin and Function. Westpoint: Bergin & Harvey, pp. 77–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. E., Maisels, F., Williamson, E. A., Fernandez, M. & Tutin, C. E. G. (1990). Gorilla diet in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon: a nutritional analysis. Oecologia 84: 326–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saracco, J. F., Collazo, J. A. & Groom, M. J. (2004). How frugivores track resources? Insight from spatial analyses of bird foraging in a tropical forest. Oecologia 139: 235–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, H. M., Schmidt, V. & Baierlein, F. (2003). Discrimination abilities for nutrients: which difference matters for choosy birds and why? Animal Behaviour 65: 531–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöning, C., Ellis, D., Fowler, A. & Sommer, V. (2007). Army ant prey availability and consumption by chimpanzees at Gashaka (Nigeria). Journal of Zoology 271: 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, V. (2000). The holy wars about infanticide. Which side are you on? And why? In van Schaik, C. & Janson, C. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, V. (2008). Welcher Affe steckt in uns? Bild der Wissenschaft 4: 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, V., Adanu, J., Faucher, I. & Fowler, A. (2004). The Nigerian Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes vellerosus) at Gashaka: Two years of habituation efforts. Folia Primatologica 75: 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, C. (1998). The social behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos: Empirical evidence and shifting assumptions. Current Anthropology 39: 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman, R. L. (Hg.) (1984). The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takemoto, H. (2003). Phytochemical determination for leaf food choice by wild chimpanzees in Guinea, Bossou. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 2551–2573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Hg.) (ed.), Sexual Selection and The Descent of Man, 1871–1971. Illinois, Chicago : Aldine Press, pp. 136–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, C. E. G. & Fernandez, M. (1993). Relationships between minimum temperature and fruit production in some tropical forest trees in Gabon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9: 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P. (1989). The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In Standen, V. & Foley, R. A. (eds.), Comparative Socioecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervaecke, H., de Vries, H. & van Elsacker, L. (2000). Function and distribution of coalitions in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). Primates 41: 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, C. (1999). Anthropologische Spuren. Zur Natur des Menschen. Ed. & introd. by Sommer, V.; Edition Universitas. Stuttgart: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, C. & Sommer, V. (1994). Drum prüfe, wer sich ewig bindet. In Schiefenhövel, W., Vogel, C., Vollmer, G. (eds.), Vom Affen zum Halbgott. Stuttgart: Trias, pp. 13–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, F. J. & Wrangham, R. W. (1988). Food competition and patch size in the chimpanzee ­species Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes. Behaviour 105: 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witmer, M. C. (1998). Do seeds hinder digestive processing of fruit pulp? implications for plant / frugivore mutualisms. The Auk 115: 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witmer, M. C. & van Soest, P. J. (1998). Contrasting digestive strategies of fruit-eating birds. Functional Ecology 12: 728–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, R. & Boesch, C. (2003). The choice of post-conflict interactions in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour 140: 1527–1559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1979). On the evolution of ape social systems. Social Science Information 18: 335–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75: 262–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1986). Ecology and social evolution in two species of chimpanzees. In Rubenstein, D. I. & Wrangham, R. W. (eds.), Ecology and Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 352–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic Males. Apes and the Origins of Human Violence. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. & Waterman, P. G. (1983). Condensed tannins in fruits eaten by chimpanzees. Biotropica 15: 217-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W., Conklin-Brittain, N. L. & Hunt, K. D. (1998). Dietary response of chimpanzees and Cercopithecines to seasonal variation in fruit abundance. I. Anti-feedants. International Journal of Primatology 19: 949–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W., Chapman, C. A., Clark-Arcadi, A. P. & Isabirye-Basuta, G. (1996). Social ecology of Kanyawara chimpanzees: implications for understanding the costs of great ape groups. In McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F. & Nishida, T. (eds.), Great Ape Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W., Conklin, N. L., Chapman, C. A. & Hunt, K. D. (1991). The significance of fibrous foods for Kibale Forest chimpanzees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 334: 171–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W., McGrew, W. C., de Waal, F. B. M. & Heltne, P. G. (eds.) (1994). Chimpanzee Cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Sommer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sommer, V., Bauer, J., Fowler, A., Ortmann, S. (2011). Patriarchal Chimpanzees, Matriarchal Bonobos: Potential Ecological Causes of a Pan Dichotomy. In: Sommer, V., Ross, C. (eds) Primates of Gashaka. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects, vol 35. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7403-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics