Skip to main content

The Influence of Short Project Timeframes on Web Development Practices: A Field Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

A number of recent surveys of Web development have revealed that typical project timeframes are of the order of 3 months. This chapter reports the findings of a field study conducted in Ireland which set out to contribute towards a better understanding of the nature of high-speed Web development practices. Qualitative interview data was gathered from 14 interviewees, purposefully selected from a variety of different organisations and backgrounds. This data was then analysed using the Grounded Theory method, and ten core dimensions were revealed: (1) the role of collaborative groupware tools; (2) collective code ownership; (3) timeframe driven by business imperatives; (4) enablers of productivity; (5) quality “satisficing”; (6) requirements clarity; (7) process maturity; (8) collectively agreed project schedules; (9) closeness to client; and (10) working software over documentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barry, C. and Lang, M. (2003) A Comparison of “Traditional” and Multimedia Information Systems Development Practices. Information and Software Technology. 45(4), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baskerville, R., Levine, L., Pries-Heje, J., Ramesh, B., and Slaughter, S. (2001) How Internet Software Companies Negotiate Quality. IEEE Computer. 34(5), 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baskerville, R. and Pries-Heje, J. (2001) Racing the E-Bomb: How the Internet Is Redefining Information Systems Development Methodology. In: Russo, N. L. et al. (eds), Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development: The Social and Organizational Perspective. IFIP WG8.2 Conference, Boise, Idaho, USA, 27–29 July 2001, pp. 49–68. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baskerville, R. and Pries-Heje, J. (2004) Short Cycle Time Systems Development. Information Systems Journal. 14(3), 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks, F. P. (1987) No Silver Bullet/Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering. IEEE Computer. 20(4), 10–18.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glass, R. L. (2001) Who’s Right in the Web Development Debate? Cutter IT Journal. 14(7), 6–10.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jayaratna, N., Holt, P. and Wood-Harper, T. (1999) Criteria for Methodology Choice in Information Systems Development. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government. 5(2), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lang, M. and Fitzgerald, B. (2005) Hypermedia Systems Development Practice: A Survey. IEEE Software. 20(2), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Linden, T. and Cybulski, J. (2003) Capturing Best Practices in Web Development. In: Isaías, P. and Karmakar, N. (eds), IADIS International WWW/Internet 2003 Conference, Algarve, Portugal, November 5–8, Vol. 1, pp. 427–434. Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS Press. ISBN 972-98947-1-X.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Locke, K. (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodriguez-Garcia, D. and Harrison, R. (2000) Practitioners Views on Web Development: An Industrial Survey by Semi-Structured Interviews. In: 13th International Conference on Software and Systems Engineering and Their Applications (ICSSEA 2000), Paris, France, December 5–8. CNAM. Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN 0-8039-5939-7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suchman, L. A. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, D. (1998) Web Time Software Development. Software Development Magazine. 6(10), 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lang, M. (2011). The Influence of Short Project Timeframes on Web Development Practices: A Field Study. In: Song, W., et al. Information Systems Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7355-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7355-9_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7205-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7355-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics