Epidemiology and Biostatistics

Chapter

Abstract

Epidemiology and biostatistics are two of the foundations of public health science and practice (Institute of Medicine, 1988). Graduate and undergraduate degrees in schools of public health all include some level of training in these basic disciplines. As an epidemiologist, I consider the training to be vital to provide future researchers and practitioners of public health the analytic reasoning and interpretation skills to (1) understand and interpret research publications, (2) plan and execute research and evaluation studies, (3) provide scientific information about causal evidence, and (4) use information about risk factors and cause to shape programs and policies. For public health practitioners who are epidemiology specialists, the training and the skill set is more complex and expansive. When teaching the complexity of analytic reasoning in epidemiology, we often search for relevant, real world examples that permit us to impart both methods and broader public health content. Disability epidemiology provides a rich opportunity on both counts. It offers intellectually stimulating examples on issues that span the disciplines of both epidemiology and biostatistics. These issues, some of which are discussed in this chapter, relate to everything from pragmatic problems in field research to theoretical frameworks about the impact of risk factors across multiple levels of personal and environmental influences. Special populations, including people with disability (PWD), also offer an opportunity to examine and grapple with the public health challenge of disparities, and through that challenge, to help the disciplines of epidemiology and biostatistics to evolve. Unfortunately, there is an uneasy and even disrespectful relationship between the disability world and the world of public health, including epidemiology, when such an interface exists at all.

Keywords

Arthritis Depression Europe Insurance Coverage Transportation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Supported, in part, by funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; grant # U48/CCU710806) for the Methods Core of the Saint Louis University Prevention Research Center. The author gratefully acknowledges the primary mythological coursework that provides the foundation for this chapter from Drs. Noel Weiss and Thomas Koepsell at the University of Washington School of Public Health (Koepsell & Weiss, 2003). However, they bear no responsibility for errors or interpretations that deviate from their teachings. The author also appreciates the assistance of the following individuals in the preparation of this work: Tori Vahle, M.P.H., Janet Tang, M.P.H., Tricia McLendon, M.P.H., Erin DeFries Bouldin, M.P.H., and Tegan Boehmer, Ph.D. The students of my graduate course in disability epidemiology at the Saint Louis University School of Public Health also furnished valuable comments, questions, and editing; their time and patience have made this a better product.

References

  1. Adler, M. (1996). People with disabilities: Who are they? Beyond the Water’s Edge: Charting the course of managed care for people with disabilities. Washington: Office on Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy/ASPE/Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  2. American College of Epidemiology Ethics Guidelines. (2000). Annals of Epidemiology, 10, 487–497.Google Scholar
  3. Andresen, E. M., Fouts, B. S., Romeis, J. C., & Brownson, C. A. (1999a). Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 877–884.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andresen, E. M., Prince-Caldwell, A., Akinci, F., Brownson, C A., Hagglund, K., Jackson-Thompson, J., & Crocker, R. (1999b). The Missouri Disability & Health Project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16(3S), 63–71.Google Scholar
  5. Andresen, E. M., Fitch, C. A., McLendon, P., & Meyers, A. (2000). Reliability and validity of disability questions for U.S. Census 2000. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1297–1299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andresen, E. M., Lollar, D., & Meyers, A. R. (2000). Disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12 supplement 2), S1–S4.Google Scholar
  7. Andresen, E. M., & Brownson, R. C. (2000). Disability and health status: Ethnic differences among women in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 200–206.Google Scholar
  8. Andresen, E. M.,Vahle, V. J., & Lollar, D. (2001). Proxy reliability: Health-related quality of life measures for people with disability. Quality of Life Research, 10, 609–619.Google Scholar
  9. Andresen, E. M. (2004). Public health education, research, and disability studies: a view from epidemiology (invited commentary). Disability Studies Quarterly, 24. Available at: http://www.dsq-sds-archives.org/_articles_html/2004/fall/dsq_fall04_andresen.asp.
  10. Andresen, E. M., Diehr, P., & Luke, D. A. (2004). Public health surveillance of low-frequency populations. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 25–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Austin, M. A. (2002). Ethical issues in human genome epidemiology: a case study based on the Japanese American Family Study in Seattle, Washington. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 585–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barnett, S., & Franks, P. (1999). Telephone ownership and deaf people: implications for telephone surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1754–1756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beauchamp, T. L., Cook, R. R., Fayerweather, W. E., Raabe, G. K., Thar, W. E., Cowles, S. R., & Spivey, G. H. (1991). Ethical guidelines for epidemiologists. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(suppl. 1), 151S–169S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bennett, J. C. (1993). Inclusion of women in clinical trials – policies for population subgroups. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 288–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Best, A. E. (1999). Secondary databases and their use in outcomes research: a review of the area resource file and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Journal of Medical Systems, 23, 175–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bosco, L. (2001). Databases for outcomes research: what has 10 years of experience taught us? Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 10, 445–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bouldin, E. D., Akhtar, W., Brumback, B., & Andresen, E. (2009). Characteristics of caregivers and non-caregivers – Florida, 2008. Gainesville, revised April 8, 2009. Available at: http://fodh.phhp.ufl.edu/publications/.
  18. Buring, J. E., & Hennekens, C. H. (1994). Randomized trials of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. An investigators view. Annals of Epidemiology, 4, 111-114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carrasquillo, O., Lantigua, R. A., & Shea, S. (2000). Differences in functional status of Hispanic versus non-Hispanic White elders: data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Journal of Aging and Health, 12, 342–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1998). Use of cervical and breast cancer screening among women with and without functional limitations--United States, 1994–1995. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 47, 853–856.Google Scholar
  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). State specific prevalence of disability among adults – 11 states and the District of Columbia, 1998. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 49, 711–714.Google Scholar
  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001a). Healthy People 2010, Objectives Report (Chapter 6: Disability and Secondary Conditions). Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001b). Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions, U.S. 1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50, 170–175.Google Scholar
  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). EpiInfo. Atlanta: Epidemiology Program Office, Division of Public Health Surveillance and Informatics, CDC. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo/.
  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. (2004). Hearing loss. Revised October 29th, 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/dd/hi3.htm February 9th, 2010.
  26. Chalmers, T. C., Celano, P., Sacks, H. S., Smith, H. (1983). Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 309, 1358-1361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chan, E., Zhan, C., & Homer, C. J. (2002). Health care use and costs for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: national estimates from the medical expenditure panel survey. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 156, 504–511.Google Scholar
  28. Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Checkoway, H., Crawford-Brown, D. J., & Pearce, N. E. (1989). Research Methods in Occupational Epidemiology (Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vol 13). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H. B., McArdle, R., Wilson, R. H., & Doyle, P. J. (2005). The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends in Amplification, 9, 111–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chwastiak, L. A., & Von Korff, M. (2003). Disability in depression and back pain: evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 507–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., Amman, E., Kollerits, B., Chatterji, S., Ustun, T. B., & Stucki, G. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 205–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Clancy, C. M., & Andresen, E. M. (2002). Meeting the health care needs of persons with disabilities: a commentary. Milbank Quarterly, 80, 381–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cohen, S. B. (2002). The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: an overview. Effective Clinical Practice, 5(3 suppl), E1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cohen, J. W., Monheit, A. C., Beauregard, K. M., Cohen, S. B., Lefkowitz, D. C., Potter, D. E., Sommers, J. P., Taylor, A. K., & Arnett, R. H. (1996–1997). The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource. Inquiry, 33, 373–389.Google Scholar
  36. Coughlin, S. S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (Ed.). (1996). Ethics and epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Curtis, J. R. (1998). The “patient-centered” outcomes of critical care: what are they and how should they be used? New Horizons, 6, 26–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Davis, T. C., Long, S. W., Jackson, R. H., Mayeaux, E. J., George, R. B., Murphy, P. W., & Crouch, M. A. (1993). Rapid assessment of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Family Medicine, 25, 391–395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. DeLateur, B. J. (1997). The 29th Walter J. Zeiter Lecture. Quality of life: a patient-centered outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 237–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Delman, J. (2007). Consumer-driven and conducted survey research in action. In T. Kroll, D. Keer, P. Placek, J. Cyril, & F. Hendershot (Eds). Towards best practices for surveying persons with disabilities (Vol 1). New York: Nova Science Publishers, 71–86.Google Scholar
  41. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Classifying and reporting functional status. Hyattsville, MD. (Also see web site: www.ncvhs.hhs.gov).
  42. District of Columbia, Department of Health. (2010). Bureau of injury and disability prevention. Available at: http://dchealth.dc.gov/doh/cwp/view,A,1374,Q,580499.asp.
  43. Druss, B. G., Marcus, S. C., Rosenheck, R. A., Olfson, M., Tanelian, T., & Pincus, H. A. (2000). Understanding disability in mental and general medical conditions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 1485–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Druss, B. G., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2000). Use of practitioner-based complementary therapies by persons reporting mental conditions in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 708–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Eckhardt, E., & Anastas, J. (2006). Research methods with disabled populations. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation, 6, 233–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Egede, L. E., Zheng, D., & Simpson. K. (2002). Comorbid depression is associated with increased health care use and expenditures in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 5, 464–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Elixhauser, A., Machlin, S. R., Zodet, M. W., Chevarley, F. M., Patel, N., McCormick, M. C., & Simpson, L. (2002). Health care for children and youth in the United States: 2001 annual report on access, utilization, quality, and expenditures. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 2, 419–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Feinleib, M. (1991). The epidemiologist’s responsibilities to study participants. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(suppl. 1), 73S–79S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp 217–229.Google Scholar
  50. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). ‘Mini-mental state.’ A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fowler, E., MacRae, S., Stern, A., Harrison, T., Gerteis, M., Walker, J., Edgman-Levitan, S., & Ruga, W. (1999). The built environment as a component of quality care: understanding and including the patient’s perspective. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 25, 352–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Fresno. (2010). The County of Fresno. Child Health and Disability Prevention Program. Available at: http://www.co.fresno.ca.us/DivisionPage.aspx?id=33821.
  53. Fritz, J. M., Delitto, A., Welch, W. C., & Erhard, R. E. (1998). Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcomes measurements. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 700–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gallagher, E. M., & Scott, V. J. (1997). The STEPS Project: participatory action research to reduce falls in public places among seniors and persons with disabilities. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 88, 129–133.Google Scholar
  55. Gentry, E. M., Kalsbeek, W. D., Hogelin, G. C., Jones, J. J., Gaines, K. L., Forman, M. R., Marks, J. S., & Trowbridge, F. L. (1985). The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1, 9–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Gilliam, F., Kuzniecky, R., Faught, E., Black, L., Carpenter, G., & Schrodt. R. (1997). Patient-validated content of epilepsy-specific quality-of-life measurement. Epilepsia, 38, 233–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Goldberg, R. W., Seybolt, D. C., & Lehman, A. (2002). Reliable self-report of health service use by individuals with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 53, 879–881.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gordis, L. (1991). Ethical and professional issues in the changing practice of epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(suppl. 1), 9S–13S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gordis, L. (2000). Epidemiology (2nd edition) with student consult online access. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  60. Grimby, G., & Smedby, B. (2001). ICF approved as the successor of ICIDH. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33, 33–34.Google Scholar
  61. Guerrero, J. L., Sniezek, J. E., & Sehgal, M. (1999). The prevalence of disability from chronic conditions due to injuries among adults ages 18–69 years: United States, 1994. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 187–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Gurwitz, J. H., Col, N. F., & Avory, J. (1992). The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 1417–1422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hagey, R. S. (1997). The use and abuse of participatory action research. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 18, 1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Hanson, K. L. (2001). Patterns of insurance coverage within families with children. Health Affairs, 20, 240–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Higginson, J., & Chu, F. (1991). Ethical considerations and responsibilities in communicating health risk information. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(suppl. 1), 51S–56S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hoffman, H. J., Ishii, E. K., & Macturk, R. H. (1998). Age-related changes in the prevalence of smell/taste problems among the United States adult population: Results of the 1994 Disability Supplement to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 855, 716–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hogan, D. P., Msall, M. E., Rogers, M. L., & Avery, R. C. (1997). Improved disability population estimates of functional limitation among American children aged 5-17. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 4, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Iezzoni, L. I. (2002). Using administrative data to study persons with disabilities. Milbank Quarterly, 80, 347–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Iezzoni, L. I., McCarthy, E. P., Davis, R. B., Harris-David, L., & O’Day, B. (2001). Use of screening and preventive services among women with disabilities. American Journal of Medical Quality, 16, 135–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (1988). The future of public health. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  71. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (1991). Disability in America. Toward a national agenda for prevention. A. M. Pope & A. R. Tarlove, (Eds). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  72. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (1997). Enabling America. Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. E. N. Brandt & A. M. Pope, (Eds.). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  73. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2001). Health Literacy. A prescription to end confusion. L. Nielsen-Bohlman, A. N. Panzer, & D. A. Kindig, (Eds.) Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  74. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2003). Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals for the 21st century. K. Gebbe, K Rosenstock, & L. M. Hernandez, (Eds.). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  75. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2005). Workshop on disability in America. A New look. M. J. Field, A. M. Jette, & L. Martin, (Eds.). Washington: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  76. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2007). The future of disability in America. M. J. Field & A. M. Jette, (Eds.). Washington: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  77. Jamoom, E. W., Andresen, E. M., Neugaard, B., & McKune, S. L. (2008). The effect of caregiving on preventive care for people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 1, 51–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Keith, M. M., Cann, B., Brophy, J. T., Hellyer, D., Day, M., Egan, S., Mayville, K., & Watterson, A. (2001). Identifying and prioritizing gaming workers’ health and safety concerns using mapping for data collection. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 39, 42–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in observational epidemiology (2nd Ed). New York: Oxford University Press, pp 354–358.Google Scholar
  80. Kneipp, S. M., & Yarandi, H. N. (2002). Complex sampling designs and statistical issues in secondary analysis. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24, 552–566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Koepsell, T. D., & Weiss, N. S. (2003). Epidemiologic methods. Studying the occurrence of illness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Koplan, J. P., Thacker, S. B., & Lezin, N. A. (1999). Epidemiology in the 21st Century: calculation, communication, and intervention. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1153–1155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. LaPlante, M. P., Harrington, C., & Kang, T. (2002). Estimating paid and unpaid hours of personal assistance services in activities of daily living provided to adults living at home. Health Services Research, 37, 397–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lawton, M. P., & Herzog, A. R. (1989). Special research methods for gerontology. Society and aging series. J.A. Hendricks, (Ed.). Amityville: Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar
  85. Leung, M. W., Yen, I. H., & Minkler, M. (2004). Community based participatory research: a promising approach for increasing epidemiology’s relevance in the 21st century. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 499–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lollar, D. J. (2002). Public health and disability: emerging opportunities. Public Health Reports, 117, 131–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lollar, D. J., & Crews, J. E. (2003). Redefining the role of public health in disability. Annual Reviews of Public Health, 24, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Luciano, J. V., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Fernandez, A., Aguado, J., Serrano-Blanco, A., Roca, M., & Haro, J. M. (2010). Utility of the twelve-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) for discriminating depression “caseness” and severity in Spanish primary care patients. Quality of Life Research, 19, 97–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Marshall, C. A., Kendall, E., Catalano, T., & Barnett, L. (2008). The spaces between: partnerships between women researchers and indigenous women with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 191–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. McArdle, R., Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H. B., Wilson, R. H., & Doyle, P. J. (2005). The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends in Amplification, 9, 127–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. McBryde Johnson, H. (2003). Unspeakable conversations or how I spent one day as a token cripple at Princeton University. New York Times, Section 6, 50–55, 74, 78–79.Google Scholar
  92. McKune, S., Andresen, E. M., Zhang, J., & Neugaard B. (2006). Caregiving: A national profile & assessment of caregiver services & needs. Americus, GA: Rosalyn Carter Institute for Caregiving. Available at: http://www.rosalynncarter.org/publications.
  93. McGuire, L. C., Bouldin, E. L., Andresen, E. M., & Anderson, L. A. (2010). Examining modifiable health behaviors, body weight, & use of preventive services among caregivers & non-caregivers aged 65 years & older, Hawaii, Kansas, & Washington using BRFSS, 2007. Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/f5614366818084j6/.
  94. Meinert, C. L., & Tonascia, S. (1986). Clinical trials: design, conduct, and analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Meyers, A. R., & Andresen, E. M. (2000). Enabling our instruments: accommodation, universal design, and assured access to participation in research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12 suppl. 2), S5–S9.Google Scholar
  96. Minkler, M., Fadem, P., Perry, M., Blum, K., Moore, L., & Rogers, J. (2002). Ethical dilemmas in participatory action research: a case study from the disability community. Health Education and Behavior, 29, 14–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Mirza, M., Anandan, N., Madnick, F., & Hammel, J. (2006). A participatory program evaluation of a systems change program to improve access to information technology by people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 1185–1199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Morrow, M., Arunkumar, M. C., Pearce, E., & Dawson, H. E. (2007). Fostering disability-inclusive HIV/AIDS programs in northeast India: a participatory study. BMC Public Health, 7, 125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mullner, R. M., Jewell, M. A., & Mease, M. A. (1999). Monitoring changes in home health care: a comparison of two national surveys. Journal of Medical Systems, 23, 21–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Nanda, U., & Andresen, E. M. (1998). Performance of measures of health-related quality of life and function among disabled adults. Quality of Life Research, 7, 644.Google Scholar
  101. National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (1998). Notice of proposed long-range plan for fiscal years 1999–2004. Federal Register, 63, 57189–57219.Google Scholar
  102. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2001). Spinal cord injury. Facts and figures at a glance. Birmingham, AL. Available at: http://images.main.uab.edu/spinalcord/pdffiles/factsfig.pdf.
  103. Neugaard, B., Andresen, E. M., DeFries, E. L., Talley, R. C., & Crews, J. E. (2007). The characteristics of caregivers and care recipients: North Carolina, 2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56, 529–532.Google Scholar
  104. Newacheck, P. W., Strickland, B., Shonkoff, J. P., Perrin, J. M., McPherson, M., McManus, M., Lauver, C., Fox, H., & Arango, P. (1998). An epidemiologic profile of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics, 2, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Olfson, M., Marcus, S. C., Druss, B., & Pincus, H. A. (2002a) National trends in the use of outpatient psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1914–1920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Olfson, M., Marcus, S. C., Druss, B., Elinson, L., Tanielian, T., & Pincus, H. A. (2002b). National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 203–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., & Nurss, J. R. (1995). The Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults: A new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10, 537–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Pless, I. B. (Ed). (1994). The epidemiology of childhood disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Pocock, S. J. (1983). Clinical trials: a practical approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  110. Porta, M. (2008). A dictionary of epidemiology (5th edition). New York: Oxford, p. 81.Google Scholar
  111. Prysak, G. M., Andresen, E. M., & Meyers, A. M. (2000). Prevalence of secondary conditions in veterans with spinal cord injury and their interference with life activities. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury, 6, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ravesloot, C. H., Seekins, T., Cahill, T., Lindgren, S., Nary, D. E., & White, G. (2007). Health promotion for people with disabilities: development and evaluation of the Living Well with a Disability program. Health Education and Research, 22, 522–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Reed, G. M., Dilfer, K., Bufka, L. F., Scherer, M. J., Kotzé, P., Tshivhase, M., & Stark, S. L. (2008). Three model curricula for teaching clinicians to use the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 927–941.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Reese, D. J., Ahern, R. E., Nair, S., O’Faire, J. D., & Warren, C. (1999). Hospice access and use by African Americans: addressing cultural and institutional barriers through participatory action research. Social Work, 44, 549–559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Remington, P. L., Smith, M. Y., Williamson, D. F., Anda, R. F., Gentry, E. M., & Hogeline, G. C. (1988). Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance: 1981–1987. Public Health Reports, 103, 366–375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Rioux, M. H. (1997). Disability: The place of judgment in a world of fact. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41(pt. 2), 102–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rosecrance, J. C., & Cook, T. M. (2000). The use of participatory action research and ergonomics in the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the newspaper industry. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 15, 255–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd Ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkens.Google Scholar
  119. Roy, C. M., & Cain, R. (2001). The involvement of people living with HIV/AIDS in community-based organizations: contributions and constraints. AIDS Care, 13, 421–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Russell, J. N., Hendershot, G. E., LeClere, F., Howie, L. J., & Adler, M. (1997). Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: US, 1994. Advance Data, 292, 1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Sandman, P. M. (1991). Emerging communication responsibilities of epidemiologists. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(suppl. 1), 41S-50S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Santa Barbara County Children’s Medical Services. (2010). Child Health and Disability Prevention Program. Available at: http://www.sbcphd.org/cms/chdp.html.
  123. Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., Israel, B. A., Becker, A. B., Maciak, B. J., & Hollis, R. (1998). Conducting a participatory community-based survey for a community health intervention on Detroit’s east side. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 4, 10–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Seekins, T., Smith, N., & McCleary, T. (1992). Secondary disability prevention: Involving consumers in the development of a public health surveillance instrument. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 1, 22–35.Google Scholar
  125. Silver, E. J. & Stein, R. E. (2001). Access to care, unmet health needs, and poverty status among children with and without chronic conditions. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1, 314–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Stajduhar, K. I., Lindsay, E., & McGuinness, L. (2002). A qualitative evaluation of an HIV/AIDS respite care service in Victoria, Canada. Evaluation and the Health Professional, 25, 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Stewart, R., & Bhagwanjee, A. (1999). Promoting group empowerment and self-reliance through participatory research: a case study of people with physical disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 338–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Stone, E., & Priestly, M. (1996). Parasites, pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 699–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Stoto, M. A., Hermalin, A. I., Li, R., Martin, L., Wallace, R. B., & Weed, D. L. (2001). Advocacy in epidemiology and demography. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 954, 76–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Sunki, G., Sangam, S., & Arner, T. G. (2000). EpiInfo 2000. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  131. Szklo, M., & Nieto, E. J. (2006). Epidemiology. Beyond the basics. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  132. Talley, R. C., & Crews, J. E. (2007). Framing the public health of caregiving. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 224–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Van Naarden, K., Decoufle, P., & Caldwell, K. (1999). Prevalence and characteristics of children with serious hearing impairment in metropolitan Atlanta, 1991–1993. Pediatrics, 103, 570–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Van Niekerk, L., Lorenzo, T., & Mdlokolo, P. (2006). Understanding partnerships in developing disabled entrepreneurs through participatory action research. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 323–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. van Tubergen, A., Landewe, R., Heuft-Dorenbosch, L., Spoorenberg, A., van der Heijde, D., van der Tempel, H., & Linden, S. (2003). Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 62, 140–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Von Korf, M., Koepsell, T., Curry, S., & Diehr, P. (1992). Multi-level analysis in epidemiologic research on health behaviors and outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135, 1077–1082.Google Scholar
  137. Wallace, R. B., & Woolson, R. F. (Eds). (1992). The epidemiologic study of the elderly. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Wang, J., Adair, C. E., & Patten, S. B. (2006). Mental health and related disability among workers: a population-based study. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 49, 514–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. White, G. W., Mathews, R. M., & Fawcett, S. B. (1989). Reducing risk of pressure sores: effects of watch prompts and alarm avoidance on wheelchair push-ups. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 287–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. White, G. W. (2002). Disability outcomes research: The golden rule as a guide for ethical practice. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47, 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. White, G. W., Suchowierska, M., & Campbell, M. (2004). Developing and systematically implementing participatory action research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, S3–S12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. White, G. W., Klatt, K., Gard, M., Suchowierska, M., & Wyatt, D. (2005). Empowerment through research: a primer to guide understanding and use of research to make a difference. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  143. World Health Organization. (2001a). International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability. Geneva: Home page and full document. http://www.who.int/icidh/.
  144. World Health Organization. (2001b). Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II). Geneva: Home page and full document http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas.
  145. Yelin, E., Herrndorf, A., Trupin, L., & Sonneborn, D. (2001). A national study of medical care expenditures for musculoskeletal conditions: the impact of health insurance and managed care. Arthritis and Rheumatology, 44, 1160–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Zahm, S. H. (1992). On epidemiology and the obligation to notify study subjects (Ethics Forum). Epidemiology Monitor, 12(2), 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health ProfessionsUniversity of Florida Health Sciences CenterGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations