Abstract
Service Level Agreements require a monitoring system that checks that no party violates the agreement. Current monitoring techniques either have a high performance overhead or are not reliable enough. This paper proposes a new hybrid monitoring system that we call reactive monitoring. It tries to balance the disadvantages of established monitoring techniques, in particular online and offline monitoring. Online monitoring has a relatively high performance overhead and offline monitoring does not identify all possible violations.
Reactive monitoring combines online monitoring, which is used for reactively checking continuous SLA properties with a new passive monitoring scheme. This scheme is used for monitoring discrete SLA properties. It is based on cryptographic primitives that provide proof that either a certain stage in an interaction has been reached correctly with all participants in compliance of the service level agreements or that a violation has occurred. In the latter case the violating party can be identified.
A theoretical analysis shows that in the worst case scenario this new approach has the same overhead as online monitoring techniques and in most cases the overhead will be significantly lower.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
D. Boneh, B. Lynn, and H. Shacham. Short signatures from the weil pairing. Journal of Cryptology, 17(4):297–319, 2004.
S. Even. Protocol for signing contracts. In CRYPTO’81, pages 148–153, 1981.
S. Even, O. Goldreich, and A. Lempel. A randomized protocol for signing contracts. Commun. ACM, 28(6):637–647, 1985.
J. Garay, M. Jakobsson, and P. MacKenzie. Abuse-free optimistic contract signing. In CRYPTO’99, LNCS, Vol. 1666, page 787, Springer, 1999.
L. Gymnopoulos, S. Dritsas, S. Gritzalis, and C. Lambrinoudakis. GRID security review. LNCS, pages 100–111, 2003.
R. Jurca, B. Faltings, and W. Binder. Reliable QoS monitoring based on client feedback. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 1003–1012, ACM Press New York, NY, USA, 2007.
R. Kerr and R. Cohen. Smart cheaters do prosper: Defeating trust and reputation systems. In Proceedings of the Eigth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2009.
A. Mukhamedov and M. Ryan. Improved multi-party contract signing. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security, LNCS, Vol. 4886, pages 179–191, Springer, 2007.
A. Pichot, P. Wieder, O. Waldrich, and W. Ziegler. Dynamic SLA-negotiation based on WS-Agreement. Technical Report TR-0082, Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling, CoreGRID - Network of Excellence, June 2007.
F. Raimondi, J. Skene, and W. Emmerich. Efficient online monitoring of web-service SLAs. In SIGSOFT ’08/FSE-16: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pages 170–180, New York, USA, 2008.
O. Rana, M. Warnier, T. B. Quillinan, and F. M. T. Brazier Monitoring and Reputation Mechanisms for Service Level Agreements. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Grid Economics and Business Models (GenCon), Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain, Springer, August 2008.
A. Sahai, S. Graupner, V. Machiraju, and A. van Moorsel. Specifying and monitoring guarantees in commercial grids through SLA. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, pages 292–299, 2003.
B. Waidner and M. Waidner. Round-optimal and abuse-free optimistic multi-party contract signing. In Automata Languages and Programming, LNCS, Vol. 1853, pages 524–535, Springer, 2000.
W. Ziegler, P. Wieder, and D. Battre. Extending WS-Agreement for dynamic negotiation of Service Level Agreements. Technical Report TR-0172, Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling, CoreGRID - Network of Excellence, August 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khader, D., Padget, J., Warnier, M. (2010). Reactive Monitoring of Service Level Agreements. In: Wieder, P., Yahyapour, R., Ziegler, W. (eds) Grids and Service-Oriented Architectures for Service Level Agreements. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7320-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7320-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7319-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7320-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)