Does Vessel Noise Affect the Use of Sound by Foraging Orcinus orca (Killer Whales)?

  • Marla M. Holt
  • Dawn P. Noren
  • Candice K. Emmons
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 730)


Investigations on the behavioral responses of cetaceans to a variety of anthropogenic sounds are numerous, with a large proportion of these studies focused on responses to vessels (Nowacek et al. 2007; Richardson et al. 1995). Behavioral responses that affect activities associated with survival and reproduction are of particular concern because they have clearer repercussions on life functions. Furthermore, populations that are repeatedly exposed to vessels such as those that frequent urban ports and/or those targeted for vessel-based whale-watching activities also get particular attention given the consistency of the exposure (Clark et al. 2009; Jensen et al. 2009). Behavioral responses of killer whales to vessels include a decrease in foraging activity, an increase in dive duration and swim speed, and an increase in some surface-active behaviors (Lusseau et al. 2009; Noren et al. 2009; Williams et al. 2009). However, it remains unclear whether the physical presence and/or the sound emitted from motorized vessels is associated with the observed behavioral effects because information about received sound levels and other sound exposure variables were not reported in previous investigations.


Killer Whale Dive Duration Resident Killer Whale Pulse Call Discrete Call 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Anna-Maria Seibert, Christine Froschl, and Teresa Mongillo for field support. Val Veirs, Scott Veirs, and the students of provided valuable support and assistance with hydrophone calibration, sound propagation, and localization error assessments.

Financial support was provided by the Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Seattle, WA; the NOAA NMFS Ocean Acoustics Program, Silver Spring, MD; and the National Research Council Postdoctoral Associateship Program, Washington, DC.

We thank the conference organizers and sponsors for travel support to attend the Conference on the Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life in Cork, Ireland.

Data were collected under Scientific Research Permit No. 781-1824-00 from the US NMFS Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MD, and Species at Risk Act/Marine Mammal Licence MML 2007-08/SARA-68 and MML 2008-05/SARA-85, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa, ON, Canada.


  1. Clark CW, Ellison WT, Southall BL, Hatch L, Van Parijs S, Frankel A, Ponirakis DW (2009) Acoustic masking in marine ecosystems: Intuition, analysis, and implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Foote AD, Osborne RW, Hoelzel AR (2004) Whale-call response to masking boat noise. Nature 428:910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ford JKB (1989) Acoustic behaviour of resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) off Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Can J Zool 67:727–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ford JKB, Ellis GM (2006) Selective foraging by fish-eating killer whales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 316:185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hansen MB, Baird R, Ford JKB, Hempelmann-Halos J, Van Doornik DM, Candy JR, Emmons CK, Schorr GS, Gisborne B, Ayres KL, Wasser SK, Balcomb KC, Balcomb-Bartok K, Sneva JG, Ford MJ (2010) Species and stock identification of prey consumed by endangered southern resident killer whales in their summer range. Endang Species Res 11:69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoezel AR, Osborne RW (1986) Killer whale call characteristics: Implications for cooperative foraging strategies. In: Kirkevold BC, JS Lockard JS (eds) Behavioral biology of killer whales. Alan R. Liss Inc., New York, pp 373–403.Google Scholar
  7. Holt MM, Noren DP, Veirs V, Emmons CK, Veirs S (2009) Speaking up: Killer whales (Orcinus orca) increase their call amplitude in response to vessel noise. J Acoust Soc Am 125:EL27–EL31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen FH, Bejder L, Wahlberg M, Aguilar Soto N, Madsen PT (2009) Vessel noise effects on delphinid communication. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koski K, Osborne R, Tallmon R (2006) Soundwatch public outreach/boater education project 2004-2005 final ­program report. National Marine Fisheries Service Contract No. AB133F-04-SE-0835 (Req. No. NFFP 5000-4-00026), The Whale Museum, Friday Harbor, WA.Google Scholar
  10. Lusseau D, Bain DE, Williams R, Smith JC (2009) Vessel traffic disrupts the foraging behavior of southern resident killer whales. Endang Species Res 6:211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Noren DP, Johnson AH, Rehder D, Larson A (2009) Close approaches by vessels elicit surface active behaviors by southern resident killer whales. Endang Species Res 8:179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nowacek DP, Thorne LH, Johnston DW, Tyack PL (2007) Response of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise. Mamm Rev 37:81–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richardson WJ, Greene CR Jr, Malme CI, Thomson DH (1995) Marine mammals and noise. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Williams R, Bain DE, Smith JC, Lusseau D (2009) Effects of vessels on behaviour patterns of individual southern resident killer whales, Orcinus orca. Endang Species Res 6:199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marla M. Holt
    • 1
  • Dawn P. Noren
    • 1
  • Candice K. Emmons
    • 1
  1. 1.National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMarine Mammal Ecology Team, Northwest Fisheries Science CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations