Validation of a Vibroacoustic Finite Element Model Using Bottlenose Dolphin Experiments

  • Petr Krysl
  • Vanessa Trijoulet
  • Ted W. Cranford
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 730)


Our understanding of potential impacts of anthropogenic sounds needs to grow so that environmental consequences of ocean noise levels may be evaluated. Experimentally exposing animals is expensive and often impractical or unethical, and thus simulation is among the most promising approaches, especially finite element modeling (FEM). FEM techniques have been successfully used in the area of bioacoustics of marine animals, e.g., the sonar anatomy and acoustic pathways for Cuvier’s beaked whale (Cranford et al. 2008). This animal is at the forefront of concerns about the potential impacts from Navy sonar. An obvious problem in working with this species is that we know so little about it. Neither do we have sufficient experimental observations against which to assess the validity of the simulation results. The work described here remedies that situation by validating our simulation framework using some of the experimental results available for the bottlenose dolphin.


Sound Source Sound Generation Bottlenose Dolphin Compressible Fluid Directivity Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We acknowledge the support of Dr. Frank Stone and Dr. Ernie Young, Chief of Naval Operations Environmental Readiness Division, Washington, DC; Dr. Curtis Collins, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA; and Dr. Michael Weise and Dr. James Eckman, Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA. The live dolphin CT scan dataset was provided by the US Navy Marine Mammal Program, San Diego, CA.We also thank John Hildebrand, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, for his contribution to this work and Dr. Robert Gisiner, currently with the Marine Mammal Commission, Bethesda, MD.


  1. Au WWL, Moore PWB, Pawloski D (1986) Echolocation transmitting beam of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin. J Acoust Soc Am 80:688–691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cranford TW (2000) In search of impulse sound sources in odontocetes. In: Au WWL, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing by whales and dolphins. Springer, New York, pp 109–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cranford TW, Amundin M, Norris KS (1996) Functional morphology and homology in the odontocete nasal complex: Implications for sound generation. J Morphol 228:223–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cranford TW, Krysl P, Hildebrand JA (2008) Acoustic pathways revealed: Simulated sound transmission and reception in Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris). Bioinsp Biomim 3:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans WE, Sutherland WW, Beil RG (1964) The directional characteristics of delphinid sounds. In: Tavolga WN (ed) Marine Bio-Acoustics, vol 2. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 353–372.Google Scholar
  6. Krysl P, Cranford TW, Hildebrand JA (2008) Lagrangian finite element treatment of transient vibration/acoustics of biosolids immersed in fluids. Int J Numer Meth Eng 74:754–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moore PW, Dankiewicz LA, Houser DS (2008) Beamwidth control and angular target detection in an echolocating bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). J Acoust Soc Am 124:3324–3332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Norris KS, Harvey GW (1974) Sound transmission in the porpoise head. J Acoust Soc Am 56:659–664.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Krysl
    • 1
  • Vanessa Trijoulet
    • 1
  • Ted W. Cranford
    • 2
  1. 1.University of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations