Advertisement

Atomization Models

  • C. A. ChryssakisEmail author
  • D. N. Assanis
  • F. X. Tanner
Chapter

Abstract

In an effort to characterize fuel sprays using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes, a number of spray breakup models have been developed. The primary atomization of liquid jets and sheets is modeled considering growing wave instabilities on the liquid/gaseous interface or a combination of turbulence perturbations and instability theories. The most popular approaches for the secondary atomization are the Taylor Analogy Breakup (TAB) model, the Enhanced-TAB (E-TAB) model, and the WAVE model. Variations and improvements of these models have also been proposed by other researchers. In this chapter, an overview of the most representative models used nowadays is provided.

Keywords

Atomization Breakup CAB model KH-RT model LISA TAB model USB model 

References

  1. 1.
    K.Y. Huh, E. Lee, J.-Y. Koo, Diesel spray atomization model considering nozzle exit turbulence conditions, Atomization and Sprays, 8:453–469, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.R. Munson, D.F. Young, T.H. Okiishi, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 2nd Edition, Wiley, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.P. Schmidt, I. Nouar, P.K. Senecal, C.J. Rutland, J.K. Martin, R.D. Reitz, Pressure-swirl atomization in the near field, SAE Technical Paper Series 1999-01-0496, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.K. Senecal, D.P. Schmidt, I. Nouar, C.J. Rutland, R.D. Reitz, M.L. Corradini, Modeling high-speed viscous liquid sheet atomization, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 25:1073–1097, 1999.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.J. O’Rourke, A.A. Amsden, The TAB method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup, SAE Technical Paper 872089, 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.O. Grover, D.N. Assanis, A.M. Lippert, S.H. El Tahry, M.C. Drake, T.D. Fansler, D.L. Harrington, A critical analysis of splash criteria for GDI spray impingement, ILASS Americas, 15th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Madison, May 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F.X. Tanner, Liquid jet atomization and droplet breakup modeling of non-evaporating diesel fuel sprays, SAE Technical Paper Series 970050, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F.X. Tanner, G. Weisser, Simulation of liquid jet atomization for fuel sprays by means of a cascade drop breakup model, SAE Technical Paper Series 980808, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.D. Reitz, R. Diwakar, Structure of high-pressure fuel sprays, SAE Technical Paper Series 870598, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.D. Reitz, Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays, Atomisation and Spray Technology, 3:309–337, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.A. Patterson, R.D. Reitz, Modeling the effects of fuel spray characteristics on diesel engine combustion and emissions, SAE Technical Paper 980131, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E.A. Ibrahim, H.Q. Yang, A.J. Przekwas, modeling of spray droplets deformation and breakup, Journal of Propulsion Power, 9(4):651–654, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Chryssakis, D.N. Assanis, A unified fuel spray breakup model for internal combustion engine applications, Atomization and Sprays, 18(5):375–426, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Chryssakis, D.N. Assanis, C. Bae, Development and validation of a comprehensive CFD model of diesel spray atomization accounting for high weber numbers, SAE Technical Paper Series 2006-01-1546, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G.M. Faeth, L.-P. Hsiang, P.-K. Wu, Structure and breakup properties of sprays, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 21: (Suppl.) 99–127, 1995.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L.-P. Hsiang, G.M. Faeth, Drop properties after secondary breakup, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 19(5):721–735, 1993.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ö.L. Gülder. Temporally and spatially resolved drop sizing of dense diesel sprays. In Proc. 2nd ILASS-Americas Annual Meeting, pp. 78–81, Pittsburgh, May 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T.-W. Lee and A. ~Mitrovic. Liquid core structure of pressure – atomized sprays via laser tomographic imaging, Atomization and Sprays, 6:111–126, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Yue, C.F. Powell, R. Poola, J. Wang, and J.K. Schaller. Quantitative measurements of diesel fuel spray characteristics in the near-nozzle region using X-ray absorption. Atomization and Sprays, 11(4):471–490, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.B. Liu and R.D. Reitz. Mechanisms of air-assisted liquid atomization. Atomization and Sprays, 3:55–75, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Bellman and R.H. Pennington. Effects of surface tension and viscosity on Taylor instability. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 12(2), 1954.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Schneider. Experimental investigation of diesel sprays. CRFD and Laser Diagnostic Workshop, 21st CIMAC Congress 1995, Interlaken, May 1995.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    V.G. Levich. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 639–650, 1962.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    F.X. Tanner. Development and validation of a cascade atomization and drop breakup model for high-velocity dense sprays. Atomization and Sprays, 14(3):211–242, 2004.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.D. Naber and D.L. Siebers. Effects of gas density and vaporization on penetration and dispersion of diesel sprays. SAE Paper 960034, 1996.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    F.X. Tanner, K.A. Feigl, S.A. Ciatti, C.F. Powell, S.-K. Cheong, J. ~Liu, and J. ~Wang, Structure of high-velocity dense sprays in the near-nozzle region, Atomization and Sprays, 16:579–597, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O. Kaario, M. Larmi, and F.X. Tanner. Non-evaporating liquid spray simulations with the ETAB and wave droplet breakup models. In Proc. 18th ILASS-Europe Annual Conference, pp. 49–54, Zaragoza, September 2002.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Srinivasan, J. Macek, M. Polacek, and F.X. Tanner. Computational optimization of a split injection system with EGR and boost pressure/compression ratio variations in a diesel engine. SAE Paper 2007-01-0168, 2007.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    F.X. Tanner and S. Srinivasan. CFD-based optimization of fuel injection strategies in a diesel engine using an adaptive gradient method. Journal of Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33:1366–1385, 2009.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    F.X. Tanner, K.A. Feigl, T.O. Althaus, and E.J. Windhab. Modeling and simulation of an air-assist atomizer for food sprays. In Proc. 21st ILASS-Americas Annual Conference, Orlando, May 2008. CD ROM Publication.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    F.X. Tanner, S. Srinivasan, T.O. Althaus, K.A. Feigl, and E.J. Windhab. Modeling and validation of the crystallization process in food sprays. In Eleventh Triennial International Conference on Liquid Atomization & Spray Systems, ICLASS 2009, Vail, July 2009. CD-ROM Publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer US 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. Chryssakis
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. N. Assanis
  • F. X. Tanner
  1. 1.School of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering, Division of Marine EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensZografou, AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations