Early Patient Stratification and Predictive Biomarkers in Drug Discovery and Development
The current drug discovery paradigm is long, costly, and prone to failure. For projects in early development, lack of efficacy in Phase II is a major contributor to the overall failure rate. Efficacy failures often occur from one of two major reasons: either the investigational agent did not achieve the required pharmacology or the mechanism targeted by the investigational agent did not significantly contribute to the disease in the tested patient population. The latter scenario can arise due to insufficient study power stemming from patient heterogeneity. If the subset of disease patients driven by the mechanism that is likely to respond to the drug can be identified and selected before enrollment begins, efficacy and response rates should improve. This will not only augment drug approval percentages, but will also minimize the number of patients at risk of side effects in the face of a suboptimal response to treatment. Here we describe a systems biology approach using molecular profiling data from patients at baseline for the development of predictive biomarker content to identify potential responders to a molecular targeted therapy before the drug is tested in humans. A case study is presented where a classifier to predict response to a TNF targeted therapy for ulcerative colitis is developed a priori and verified against a test set of patients where clinical outcomes are known. This approach will promote the tandem development of drugs with predictive response, patient selection biomarkers.
KeywordsUlcerative Colitis Patient Patient Stratification System Biology Approach Clinical Outcome Data Companion Diagnostics
- 5.Hofmann M, Stoss O, Gaiser T, Kneitz H, Heinmöller P, Gutjahr T, Kaufmann M, Henkel T, Rüschoff J (2008) Central HER2 IHC and FISH analysis in a trastuzumab (Herceptin) phase II monotherapy study: assessment of test sensitivity and impact of chromosome 17 polysomy. J Clin Pathol 61(1):89–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes J, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1757–1765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Naylor S, Cole T (2010) Overview of companion diagnostics in the pharmaceutical industry. Drug Discov World Spring Edition: 67–79Google Scholar
- 9.Arijs I, De Hertogh G, Lemaire K, Quintens R, Van Lommel L, Van Steen K, Leemans P, Cleynen I, Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Geboes K, Schuit F, Rutgeerts P (2009) Mucosal gene expression of antimicrobial peptides in inflammatory bowel disease before and after first infliximab treatment. PLoS One 4(11):e7984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Arjis I, Li K, Toedter G, Quintens R, Van Lommel L, Van Steen K, Leemans P, De Hertogh G, Lemaire K, Ferrante M, Schnitzler F, Thorrez L, Ma K, Song XY, Maranoo C, Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Geboes K, Schuit F, Baribaud F, Rutgeerts P (2009) Mucosal gene signatures to predict response to infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut 58(12):1612–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar