Abstract
As we have seen, it was generally assumed well into the twentieth century that the effects of religious belief were beneficial and religious belief the healthy norm. ‘True’ or not, religions promoted morality, provided guidance through the travails of life, and generally inculcated ‘healthy’ attitudes towards, and understanding of, both the self and the world. Even non-believers were disinclined to dispute its mostly beneficial effects, seeking instead to find ways of achieving the same ends by new, indeed better, means. That religion was susceptible to its own peculiar pathologies of fanaticism, bigotry and superstition was admitted by all parties, but Psychology, judiciously incorporated into religious understanding, could provide means of identifying and tackling these. Such a strategy would, in many eyes, even be essential if religion was to retain its cultural credibility and role in modernist societies. There is a conundrum though—should we ascribe the qualities of believers to their beliefs, or the nature of the beliefs to the qualities of the believers? If I am a forgiving individual is this due to my having taken to heart the Lord’s Prayer, or does my forgiving temperament incline me towards a creed in which forgiveness figures so centrally as a virtue? Clearly, it would make little sense to offer a generalised answer either way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Though in the final analysis I have more or less concluded that it is the latter, as explained at the very end of the last chapter.
- 2.
I do not want to be thought over-cynical here. I recall at the age of about nine suffering an asthma attack in the middle of the night and praying fervently for its alleviation, and this being followed by the descent of a great feeling of calm reassuring relaxation and the cessation of the attack.
- 3.
There is also, of course, a derivative usage of the term, largely now obsolete in everyday language, in which ‘pray’ signifies a supplicatory attitude, ‘Be silent sir I pray you!’.
- 4.
This is reported in Pearson (1914–1930).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richards, G. (2011). The Problem of Prayer. In: Psychology, Religion, and the Nature of the Soul. Library of the History of Psychological Theories. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7173-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7173-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7172-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7173-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)