Qualitative Research from a C-OAR-SE Perspective

Chapter

Abstract

The opening quotation, from Laurent (2000), epitomizes the “statistical tail wagging the conceptual dog” problem, which is almost totally due to the neglect of, and ignorance about, qualitative research in the social sciences. Gilles Laurent was the “champion” of my original C-OAR-SE paper for IJRM (after it was rejected by the leading marketing research journal, JMR, as too radical) and I am eternally indebted to this friend, scholar, and delightful French gentleman. He and Bobby Calder (1977), a focus-group practitioner before he became a full professor of both psychology and marketing at Northwestern University, are the only two academics who have realized and spoken out about the vital role of qualitative research for theory-building in the social sciences.

Keywords

Fatigue Europe Marketing Hull Tray 

References

  1. Abelson RP (1995) Statistics as principled argument. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken LS, West SG, Millsap RE (2008) Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology. Am Psychol 63(1):32–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldinger AL (1992) What CEOs are saying about brand equity: a call to action for researchers. J Advert Res 32(4):RC6–RC12Google Scholar
  4. Belk RW (ed) (1991) Highways and buyways: naturalistic research from the consumer behavior Odyssey. Association for Consumer Research, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  5. Calder BJ (1977) Focus groups and the nature of qualitative research. J Mark Res 14(3):353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calder BJ (1994) Qualitative marketing research. In: Bagozzi RP (ed) Marketing research. Blackwell, Cambridge, pp 50–72Google Scholar
  7. Campbell DT, Stanley JC (1973) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowling GR, Kabanoff B (1996) Computer-aided content analysis: what do 240 advertising slogans have in common? Mark Lett 7(1):63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erlandson DA, Harris EL, Skipper BL, Allen SA (1993) Doing naturalistic inquiry: a guide to methods. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  10. Fern E, Monroe K (1996) Effect-size estimates: issues and problems in interpretation. J Consum Res 23(2):89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fournier S (1998) Consumer and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. J Consum Res 24(4):343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner H (1983) Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffin AJ, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Mark Sci 12(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hilgard ER (1956) Theories of learning, 2nd edn. Appleton Century Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Howard JA (1977) Consumer behaviour: application of theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hudson LA, Ozanne JL (1988) Alternative ways of seeking knowledge in consumer research. J Consum Res 14(4):508–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kover AJ (1995) Copywriters’ implicit theories of communication: an exploration. J Consum Res 21(4):596–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Langer J (1984) Managing market research: the contribution of qualitative techniques. Mark Rev 40(2):25–31Google Scholar
  20. Locke EA (2009) It’s time we brought introspection out of the closet. Perspect Psychol Sci 4(1): 24–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lunt P, Livingstone S (1996) Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. J Commun 46(2):79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McQuarrie EF (1989) Book review. J Mark 26(1):121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McQuarrie EF, McIntyre SH (1990) What the group interview can contribute to research on consumer phenomenology. Res Cons Behav 4:165–194Google Scholar
  24. Mick DG (1997) Semiotics in marketing and consumer research: balderdash, verity, please. In: Brown S, Turley D (eds) Consumer research: postcards from the edge. Routledge, London, pp 249–262Google Scholar
  25. Moran WT (1986) The science of qualitative research. J Advert Res 26(3):RC16–RC19Google Scholar
  26. Muckler FA, Seven SA (1992) Selecting performance measures: “objective” versus “subjective” measurement. Hum Factors 34(4):441–445Google Scholar
  27. Overholser C (1986) Quality, quantity and thinking real hard. J Advert Res 26(3):RC7–RC12Google Scholar
  28. Rossiter JR (1994) Commentary on A.S.C. Ehrenberg’s “Theory of well-based results: which comes first?” In: Laurent G, Lilien GL, Pras B (eds) Research traditions in marketing. Kluwer, Boston, pp 116–122Google Scholar
  29. Rossiter JR (2001) What is marketing knowledge? Stage I: forms of marketing knowledge. Mark Theory 1(1):9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rossiter JR (2002a) The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Int J Res Mark 19(4):305–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rossiter JR (2002b) The five forms of transmissible, usable marketing knowledge. Mark Theory 2(4):369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rossiter JR (2009b) Qualitative marketing research: theory and practice. Australas J Mark Soc Res 17(1):7–27Google Scholar
  33. Rossiter JR, Bellman S (2005) Marketing communications: theory and applications. Pearson Prentice Hall, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  34. Rossiter JR, Danaher PJ (1998) Advanced media planning. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  35. Rossiter JR, Lilien GL (1994) New “brainstorming” principles. Aust J Manag 19(1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rossiter JR, Percy L (1987) Advertising and promotional management. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Rossiter JR, Percy L (1997) Advertising communications and promotion management. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Rust RT, Cooil B (1994) Reliability measures for qualitative data: theory and implications. J Mark Res 31(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scipione PA (1995) The value of words: numerical perceptions associated with descriptive words and phrases in market research reports. J Advert Res 35(3):36–43Google Scholar
  40. Urban GL, Hauser JR (1993) Design and marketing of new products. 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  41. Walker R (1985b) Evaluating applied qualitative research. In: Walker R (ed) Applied qualitative research. Gower, Aldershot, pp 177–196Google Scholar
  42. Walker R (1985a) An introduction to applied qualitative research. In: Walker R (ed) Applied qualitative research. Gower, Aldershot, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  43. Webb EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L (1966) Unobtrusive measures: nonreactive research in the social sciences. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Wells WD (1986) Truth and consequences. J Advert Res 26(3):RC13–RC16Google Scholar
  45. Wells W (1993) Discovery-oriented consumer research. J Consum Res 19(4):489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Westen D, Weinberger J (2004) When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. Am Psychol 59(7):595–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson TD, Dunn DS, Kraft D, Lisle DJ (1989) Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: the disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 22:287–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimiles H (2009) Comment. Ramifications of increased training in quantitative methodology. Am Psychol 64(1):51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Greenwald AG, Brock T, Ostrom T (1968) Psychological foundations of attitudes. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Bass FM (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manag Sci 15(1):215–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Durgee JF(1985) Depth-interview techniques for creative advertising. J Advert Res 25(6):29–37Google Scholar
  52. Morrison MT, Haley E, Sheehan KB, Taylor RE (2002) Using qualitative research in advertising. Sage, Thousand Oaks CAPT, CAPIGoogle Scholar
  53. Perrault, WD, Leigh LE (1989) Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgment. J Mark Res 26(2):135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Innovation in Business and Social Research, University of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations