Skip to main content

The Potential Impact of Performance Incentive Programs on Racial Disparities in Health Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Performance incentive programs – also known as pay-for-performance, public reporting, and value-based purchasing programs – continue to receive national attention. Although these programs have become even more diverse, their basic features have not changed and the potential mechanisms by which these programs may impact racial and ethnic disparities in health care in a neutral, narrowing, or widening manner remain the same. We repeated the systematic search of the literature for the 4 intervening years since the last edition of this book. We found that although hundreds of articles continue to be written on this subject each year, there were no additions to the empirical evidence regarding the impact of performance incentive program on disparities. While the 2009 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will significantly alter the American healthcare landscape, recommendations regarding particular aspects of program design should be approached with disparity-reducing goals in mind that also remain unchanged and may be somewhat more achievable. Given the changing landscape, it is even more important that incentive programs are evaluated for their intended effect, as well as for their unintended effect on racial/ethnic disparities in health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine. Future directions for the national healthcare quality and disparities reports. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smedley BD, Nelson AR, Stith SY, editors. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oliver MN, Goodwin MA, Gotler RS, et al. Time use in clinical encounters: are African-American patients treated differently? J Natl Med Assoc. 2001;93:380–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Malley MS, Earp JA, Hawley ST, et al. The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening? Am J Public Health. 2001;91:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taira DA, Safran DG, Seto TB, et al. The relationship between patient income and physician discussion of health risk behaviors. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278:1412–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosler AS, Melnik TA. Population-based assessment of diabetes care and self-management among Puerto Rican adults in New York city. Diab Educ. 2005;31:418–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thackeray R, Merrill RM, Neiger BL. Disparities in diabetes management practice between racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Diab Educ. 2004;30:665–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hertz RP, Unger AN, Ferrario CM. Diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30:103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Massing MW, Henley NS, Carter-Edwards L, et al. Lipid testing among patients with diabetes who receive diabetes care from primary care physicians. Diab Care. 2003;26:1369–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arday DR, Fleming BB, Keller DK, et al. Variation in diabetes care among states: do patient characteristics matter? Diab Care. 2002;25:2230–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Skaer TL, Sclar DA, Robison LM, et al. Trends in the rate of depressive illness and use of antidepressant pharmacotherapy by ethnicity/race: an assessment of office-based visits in the United States, 1992–1997. Clin Ther. 2000;22:1575–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ries LAG, Eisner MPKC, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Mariotto A, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2002. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101:3–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McWhorter WP, Mayer WJ. Black/white differences in type of initial breast cancer treatment and implications for survival. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:1515–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosworth HB, Dudley T, Olsen MK, et al. Racial differences in blood pressure control: potential explanatory factors. Am J Med. 2006;119:70. e79-15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gadegbeku CA, Lea JP, Jamerson KA. Update on disparities in the pathophysiology and management of hypertension: focus on African Americans. Med Clin North Am. 2005;89:921–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chin MH, Chien AT. Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:79–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lurie N, Jung M, Lavizzo-Mourey R. Disparities and quality improvement: federal policy levers. Health Aff. 2005;24:354–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bridges to Excellence. Bridges to excellence overview. 2010. Available at: http://www.bridgestoexcellence.org/. Accessed 9 July 2010.

  21. Center for Health Care Strategies, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Descriptions of selected performance incentives programs. 2005. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/smdl/downloads/StatePerformanceIncentivesChart040606.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2006.

  22. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Pay for performance initiatives. Herb Kuhn testimony for the Senate Committee on Finance. Dated 27 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare pay-for-performance demonstration shows significant quality of care improvement at participating hospitals. 2005. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1441. Accessed 3 May 2005.

  24. Integrated Healthcare Association. Pay for performance overview. Available at: http://www.iha.org/payfpov.htm. Accessed 24 Mar 2006.

  25. The Leapfrog Group. The Leapfrog Group fact sheet. 2005. Available at: http://www.leapfroggroup.org/leapfrog-factsheet. Accessed 6 July 2009.

  26. Kurhmerker K, Hartman T. Pay-for-performance in State Medicaid Programs: Appendix B state pay-for-performance program summaries. Commonwealth Fund Publication No 1018; 2007. pp. 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kurhmerker K, Hartman T. Pay-for-performance in state Medicaid programs: a survey of state Medicaid directors and programs. Commonwealth Fund Publication No 1018; 2007. pp. 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weissman JS, Bigby J. Massachusetts health care reform – near-universal coverage at what cost? N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2012–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanner MD. Massachusetts miracle or Massachusetts miserable: what the failure of the “Massachusetts Model” tells us about health care reform. Cato Institute Briefing Paper No 112. Washington, DC; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bigby J. Controlling health care costs in Massachusetts after health care reform: there is no silver bullet. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1833–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. American Medical Association. Principles for pay-for-performance. 2009. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/368/principles4pay62705.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2009.

  32. Bokhour BG, Burgess Jr JF, Hook JM, et al. Incentive implementation in physician practices: a qualitative study of practice executive perspectives on pay for performance. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:73S–95S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dudley RA, Frolich A, Robinowitz DL, et al. Strategies to support quality-based purchasing: a review of the evidence. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. AHRQ Publication No 04-0057.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenthal MB, Frank RG. What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care? Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:135–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenthal MB, Fernandopulle R, Song HR, et al. Paying for quality: providers’ incentives for quality improvement. Health Aff. 2004;23:127–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. The Leapfrog Group. The Leapfrog Group incentives and rewards compendium. 2009. Available at: http://www.leapfroggroup.org/compendium2. Accessed 6 June 2009.

  37. Lee TH, Meyer GS, Brennan TA. A middle ground on public accountability. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2409–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Davies HTO, et al. Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom. Health Aff. 2003;22:134–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, et al. Public disclosure of performance data: learning from the US experience. Qual Health Care. 2000;9:53–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Landon BE. Commentary on “Penetrating the ‘black box’: financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services,” by Douglas A. Conrad and Jon B. Christianson. Med Care Res Rev. 2004;61:69S–75S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Conrad DA, Christianson JB. Penetrating the “black box”: financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services. Med Care Res Rev. 2004;61:37S–68S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Goddard M, Mannion R, Smith P. Enhancing performance in health care: a theoretical perspective on agency and the role of information. Health Econ. 2000;9:95–107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hillman AL, Pauly MV, Kerstein JJ. How do financial incentives affect physicians’ clinical decisions and the financial performance of health maintenance organizations? N Engl J Med. 1999;321:86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Oliver P. Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: theoretical investigations. Am J Sociol. 1980;85:1356–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Robinson JC. Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Q. 2001;79:149–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Watson SD. Race, ethnicity and quality of care: inequalities and incentives. Am J Law Med. 2001;27:203–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. United States Congress. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. PL 111-148. United States of America; 2009. pp. 1–906.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Center for Healthcare Strategies, Services CfMaM. Medicare pay-for-performance demonstration shows significant quality of care improvement at participating hospitals. 2005. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/smdl/downloads/. Accessed 27 Mar 2007.

  49. American College of Physicians. Linking physician payments to quality care. American College of Physicians: Philadelphia; 2005. pp. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  50. American Medical Association. Guidelines for the development of pay-for-performance programs. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/368/guidelines4pay62705.pdf. Accessed 6 Mar 2009.

  51. Casalino LP. The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1147–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Peterson ED, Delong ER, Masoudi FA, et al. ACCF/AHA 2010 position statement on composite measures for healthcare performance assessment: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to develop a position statement on composite measures). Circulation. 2010;121:1780–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zaslavsky AM, Shaul JA, Zaborski LB, et al. Combining health plan performance indicators into simpler composite measures. Health Care Financ Rev. 2002;23:101–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. O’Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Hays RD, et al. Exploratory factor analyses of the CAHPS Hospital Pilot Survey responses across and within medical, surgical, and obstetric services. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:2078–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. O’Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM. Domain-level covariance analysis for multilevel survey data with structured nonresponse. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008;103:1405–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nolan T, Berwick DM. All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;295:1168–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. AHRQ quality indicators Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) composite measure. In: Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, ed. Draft Technical Report. Rockville; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Timbie JW, Shahian DM, Newhouse JP, et al. Composite measures for hospital quality using quality-adjusted life years. Stat Med. 2009;28:1238–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mehta RH, Liang L, Karve AM, et al. Association of patient case-mix adjustment, hospital process performance rankings, and eligibility for financial incentives. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;300:1897–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Fairbrother G, Hanson KL, Friedman S, et al. The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:171–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kouides RW, Bennett NM, Lewis B, et al. Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. The primary-care physicians of Monroe county. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Norton EC. Incentive regulation of nursing homes. J Health Econ. 1992;11:105–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Sehgal AR. Impact of quality improvement efforts on race and sex disparities in hemodialysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:996–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bonito AJ, Bann C, Eicheldinger C, et al. Creation of new race-ethnicity codes and Socioeconomic Status (SES) indicators for Medicare beneficiaries. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Publication No 08-0029-EF.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Meltzer A, Bonito AJ. Health disparities: measuring health care use and access for racial/ethnic populatoins. Final report part 1. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/reports/downloads/Bonito_Final.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2006.

  66. Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, et al. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:2579–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Nerenz DR, Hunt KA, Escarce JJ. Health care organizations’ use of data on race/ethnicity to address disparities in health care. Health Serv Res. 2006;41:1444–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Arean PA, Ayalon L, Hunkeler E, et al. Improving depression care for older, minority patients in primary care. Med Care. 2005;43:381–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hofer TP, Hayward RA, Greenfield S, et al. The unreliability of individual physician “report cards” for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281:2098–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Werner RM, Asch DA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293:1239–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, et al. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:575–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Committee on the Changing Market MCatFVoSNP. America’s health care safety net. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Grumbach K, Hart LG, Mertz E, et al. Who is caring for the underserved? A comparison of primary care physicians and nonphysician clinicians in California and Washington. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Komaromy M, Grumbach K, Drake M, et al. The role of black and Hispanic physicians in providing health care for underserved populations. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1305–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CHA, Curtin T, et al. Shortages of medical personnel at community health centers: implications for planned expansion. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;295:1042–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z, et al. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;294:1788–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Kressin NR. Separate but not equal: the consequences of segregated health care. Circulation. 2005;112:2582–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Dudley RA, Rosenthal MB. Pay for performance: a decision guide for purchasers. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, et al. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:265–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Chien AT, Chin MH, Davis AM, et al. Pay for performance, public reporting, and racial disparities in health care: how are programs being designed? Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:283S–304S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Pourat N, Rice T, Tai-Seale M, et al. Association between physician compensation methods and delivery of guideline-concordant STD care: is there a link? Am J Manage Care. 2005;11:426–32.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Commons M, McGuire TG, Riordan MH. Performance contracting for substance abuse treatment. Health Serv Res. 1997;32:631–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Mukamel DB, Mushlin AI. Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of ­market share and price changes after publication of the New York state cardiac surgery mortality reports. Med Care. 1998;36:945–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Beaulieu ND, Horrigan DR. Putting smart money to work for quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1318–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Fairbrother G, Siegel MJ, Friedman S, et al. Impact of financial incentives on documented immunization rates in the inner city: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ambul Pediatr. 2001;1:206–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Roski J, Jeddeloh R, An L, et al. The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines. Prev Med. 2003;36:291–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Grady KE, Lemkau JP, Lee NR, et al. Enhancing mammography referral in primary care. Prev Med. 1997;26:791–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Hillman AL, Ripley K, Goldfarb N, et al. Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1699–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Hillman AL, Ripley K, Goldfarb N, et al. The use of physician financial incentives and feedback to improve pediatric preventive care in Medicaid managed care. Pediatrics. 1999;104:931–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Shen Y. Selection incentives in a performance-based contracting system. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:535–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Coleman K, Reiter KL, Fulwiler D. The impact of pay-for-performance on diabetes care in a large network of community health centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18:966–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Karve AM, Ou F-S, Lytle BL, et al. Potential unintended financial consequences of pay-for-performance on the quality of care for minority patients. Am Heart J. 2008;155:571–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyna T. Chien .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chien, A.T. (2011). The Potential Impact of Performance Incentive Programs on Racial Disparities in Health Care. In: Williams, R. (eds) Healthcare Disparities at the Crossroads with Healthcare Reform. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7136-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7136-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7135-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7136-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics