Skip to main content

The Effect of Social Norms and Economic Considerations on Purchases of Chicken

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Health and Animal Agriculture in Developing Countries

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 36))

  • 1701 Accesses

Abstract

An important characteristic of modern life is the increasing diversity of products and services that save time. While, in the past, time-saving services were primarily limited to those who could afford to employ maids or servants, the modern economy has created a whole range of time-saving products and services that are accessible to people of any economic status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bell, Frederick W. “The Pope and the Price of Fish.” The American Economic Review (December, 1968), 58(5): 1346–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellante, Don, and Ann C. Foster.“Working Wives and Expenditure on Services.” Journal of Consumer Research (September, 1984), 11(2): 700–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delener, Nejdet. “Religious Contrasts in Consumer Decision Behaviour Patterns: Their Dimensions and Marketing Implications.” European Journal of Marketing (1994), 28(5): 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delener, Nejdet. “The Effects of Religious Factors on Perceived Risk in Durable Goods Purchase Decisions.” Journal of Consumer Marketing (Summer, 1990), 7(3): 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Susan P. “Cross-National Comparisons and Consumer Stereotypes: A Case Study of Working and Non-Working Wives in the U.S. and France.” Journal of Consumer Research (June, 1976), 3(1): 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Elizabeth C. “American Jewish Ethnicity: Its Relationship to Some Selected Aspects of Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Marketing (Summer, 1981), 45(3): 102–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Eva, Stephanie Shipp, and Gregory Brown.“Families of Working Wives Spending More on Services and Nondurables.” Monthly Labor Review (February, 1989), 112(2): 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Chankon. “Working Wives’ Time-Saving Tendencies: Durable Ownership, Convenience Food Consumption, and Meal Purchases.” Journal of Economic Psychology (November, 1989), 10(3): 391–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, Marilyn. “Wives’ Employment, Time Pressure, and Mail/Phone Order Shopping – An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Direct Marketing (Winter, 1993), 7(1): 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickols, Sahron Y., and Karen D. Fox. “Buying Time and Saving Time: Strategies for Managing Household Production.” Journal of Consumer Research (September, 1983), 10(2): 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oropesa, R.S. “Female Labor Force Participation and Time-Saving Household Technology: A Case Study of the Microwave from 1978 to 1989.” Journal of Consumer Research (March, 1993), 19(4): 567–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, Michael D. “Working Wives and Convenience Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Research (1982), 8(4): 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaninger, Charles M., and Chris T. Allen. “Wife’s Occupational Status as a Consumer Behavior Construct.” Journal of Consumer Research (1981), 8(3): 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaninger, Charles M., Margaret Nelson, and William D. Danko. “An Empirical Evaluation of the Bartos Model of Wife’s Work Involvement.” Journal of Advertising Research (May/June, 1993), 33(3): 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, Leon G., William R. Dillon, and Festus E. Ngumah.“The Influence of Subcultural and Personality Factors on Consumer Acculturation.” Journal of International Business Studies (Fall, 1981), 12(2): 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood, James, and Yukio Nasu. “Religiosity and Nationality: An Explanatory Study of Their Effect on Consumer Behavior in Japan and the United States.” Journal of Business Research (September, 1995), 34(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strober, Myra H., and Charles B. Weinberg. “Strategies Used by Working and Nonworking Wives to Reduce Time Pressures.” Journal of Consumer Research (March, 1980), 6(4): 338–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Charles B., and Russel S. Winer. “Working Wives and Major Family Expenditures: Replication and Extension.” Journal of Consumer Research (September, 1983), 10(2): 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, Robert E., John J. Burnett, and Roy D. Howell.“On the Meaning and Measurement of Religiosity in Consumer Research.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (Spring, 1986), 14(1): 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Heiman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Disaggregation of Total Chicken Demand into the Demand for Chicken Types

Appendix: Disaggregation of Total Chicken Demand into the Demand for Chicken Types

Table 9.4 shows the decomposition of total chicken demand estimated from (equation 9.1). Although we did not place any restrictions on the parameters, parameters (they are all positive), the coefficient for consuming sometimes is smaller than the coefficient for consuming often, and both are smaller than one as they should be. All of the coefficients are significant at the 10% level except the coefficient for fresh whole cut and fresh parts of chicken. The R-square (0.83) is quite high for this type of estimation.

Table 9.4 Decomposition of total chicken demand into demand for chicken types

People who buy fresh uncut whole chicken have the largest coefficients associated with their purchases, suggesting that, when it is purchased, it is consumed more frequently than other types of chicken. People who buy chicken types sometimes consume about half (0.48) of the amount consumed by those who always buy them while those who buy often consume slightly over half (0.55) of that amount.

The coefficients in Table 9.4 transform the relative measures of purchase (sometimes, often, and always) into estimated weekly consumption of each type of chicken. For example, a respondent whose family is identified as consuming fresh uncut whole chicken always is assigned a consumption of 1.613 times per week for that chicken type while a respondent indicating sometimes in that category is assigned a weekly consumption of fresh whole uncut chicken of 0.77 times per week (=1.613 * 0.48).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heiman, A., McWilliams, B., Zilberman, D. (2012). The Effect of Social Norms and Economic Considerations on Purchases of Chicken. In: Zilberman, D., Otte, J., Roland-Holst, D., Pfeiffer, D. (eds) Health and Animal Agriculture in Developing Countries. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 36. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7077-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics