Psychology and Morality: An Interpretive-Pragmatic View

Chapter

Abstract

This book is about psychology’s grounding in morality – or, in other words, about the ethical foundations and implications of psychology. It presents the argument that psychological phenomena are inherently moral phenomena, and that psychology, as an array of investigative and interventionist practices, is, and ought to be, a moral science. Throughout the book, I aim to present a unified view of psychology and morality, not as two disjointed fields that are accidentally brought together, but as deeply and inherently related in many different ways. Often, however, the relations between psychology and morality are not recognized by psychologists themselves and this, I argue, is detrimental to the discipline, but also to the society that is affected by the workings of psychology in many different ways. Part I begins with a number of critical investigations into how modern psychology has shaped and in some ways distorted our views of morality and ourselves, and part II advances more positive and prescriptive views about how properly to conceive of morality and its relation to psychology.

Keywords

Sine Defend Metaphor Ethos Reformer 

References

  1. Annas, J. (2001). Ethics and morality. In L. C. Becker & C. B. Becker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ethics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J. M. (1901). Dictionary of philosophy and psychology. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bellah, R. N. (1983). The ethical aims of social inquiry. In N. Haan, R. N. Bellah, P. Rabinow, & W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Social science as moral inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brinkmann, S. (2004b). The topography of moral ecology. Theory and Psychology, 14, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brinkmann, S. (2006b). Mental life in the space of reasons. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavell, S. (1969). Must we mean what we say? New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Charland, L. C. (2004). Character: Moral treatment and the personality disorders. In J. Radden (Ed.), The philosophy of psychiatry: A companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Craighead, W. E., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2001). The corsini encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Dancy, J. (2000). Practical reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Danziger, K. (1997a). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Danziger, K. (2003). Where history, theory, and philosophy meet: The biography of psychological objects. In D. B. Hill & M. J. Kral (Eds.), About psychology: Essays ate the crossroads of history, theory, and philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Darley, J. M., & Schultz, T. R. (1990). Moral rules: Their content and acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1891). Moral theory and practice. International Journal of Ethics, 1, 186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press. This edition published 1966.Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty. New York: Capricorn Books. This edition 1960.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books. This edition 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Dilthey, W. (1977). Descriptive psychology and historical understanding. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. First published 1894.Google Scholar
  20. Gergen, K. (1992). Social construction and moral action. In D. N. Robinson (Ed.), Social science and moral judgment. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Graumann, C. F. (1996). Psyche and her descendants. In C. F. Graumann & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Historical dimensions of psychological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greer, S. (2003). Self-esteem and the demoralized self: A genealogy of self research and measurement. In D. B. Hill & M. J. Kral (Eds.), About psychology: Essays at the crossroads of history, theory, and philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller, M. Sosna, & D. Wellbery (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hacking, I. (1995b). The looping effect of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Harré, R. (1983). Personal being. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Harré, R. (2004). Staking our claim for qualitative psychology as science. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 3–14.Google Scholar
  27. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First published 1807.Google Scholar
  29. Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and time. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. This edition published 1962.Google Scholar
  30. Holiday, A. (1988). Moral powers: Normative necessity in language and history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jansz, J., & van Drunen, P. (2004). A social history of psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Jarzombek, M. (2000). The psychologizing of modernity: Art, architecture, and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kazdin, A. E. (2000). Encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kessen, W., & Cahan, E. D. (1986). A century of psychology: From subject to object to agent. American Scientist, 74, 640–649.Google Scholar
  36. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development volume 2 – The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  37. Köhler, W. (1959). The place of value in a world of facts. New York: Meridian Books. First published 1938.Google Scholar
  38. Lapsley, D. K. (1996). Moral psychology. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lovibond, S. (2002). Ethical formation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  41. McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. McDowell, J. (1998). Mind, value, and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mill, J. S. (1843). The logic of the moral sciences. London: Duckworth. This edition published 1987.Google Scholar
  44. Murdoch, I. (1997a). Metaphysics and ethics. In P. Conradi (Ed.), Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature. London: Chatto and Windus. Article first published 1957.Google Scholar
  45. Nussbaum, M. C. (1986). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pawlik, K., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2000). The international handbook of psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. This edition published 1975.Google Scholar
  48. Polkinghorne, D. (2000). Psychological inquiry and the pragmatic and hermeneutic traditions. Theory and Psychology, 10, 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson, D. N. (1989). Aristotle’s psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Robinson, D. N. (1992). Social science and moral science. In D. N. Robinson (Ed.), Social discourse and moral judgment. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rose, N. (1996a). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rose, N. (1999a). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  53. Ruse, M. (1991). The significance of evolution. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First published 1956.Google Scholar
  55. Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press. First published 1953.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, R. (1997). The Norton history of the human sciences. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  57. Strickland, B. (2001). The gale encyclopedia of psychology (2nd ed.). Detroit: Gale Group.Google Scholar
  58. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Toulmin, S. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Toulmin, S. (2001). Return to reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Williams, R. N., & Beyers, M. S. (2001). Personalism, social constructionism and the foundation of the ethical. Theory and Psychology, 11, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Williams, R. N., & Gantt, E. E. (1998). Intimacy and heteronomy: On grounding psychology in the ethical. Theory and Psychology, 8, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams, R. N., & Gantt, E. E. (2002). Pursuing psychology as science of the ethical: Contributions of the work of Emmanuel Levinas. In E. E. Gantt & R. N. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for the other: Levinas, ethics and the practice of psychology (pp. 1–31). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and PsychologyUniversity of AalborgAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations