Skip to main content

Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Investigating Archaeological Cultures

Abstract

The concept of an archaeological culture rarely features in any surveys of the literature of modern archaeology, especially in the Anglo-American world. When it does appear, “cultures” are treated as an anachronism – a remnant of an archaic and long-dismissed stage of the discipline. Kent Flannery’s Parable of the Golden Marshalltown provides an exemplary formulation of the unfashionable status of the archaeological culture, when the Old Timer archaeologist was sacked by his own department for his continued but apparently outdated belief in this concept (Flannery 1982). Both introductory textbooks (e.g. Johnson 1999; Hodder and Hutson 2003; Renfrew and Bahn 2008) and theoretical compilations (e.g. Preucel and Hodder 1996; Hodder 2001; Van Pool and Van Pool 2003; Funari et al. 2005; Meskell and Preucel 2006) communicate the same message: the concept of archaeological cultures is deeply flawed and, as a consequence, should no longer be applied or even discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, W.Y. and Adams, E.W. (1991). Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality: a ­dialectical approach to artefact classification and sorting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algaze, G. (1993). The Uruk World System: The Dynamics of Expansion of Early Mesopotamian Civilization, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. (1990). Migration in Archaeology: the Baby and the Bathwater. American Anthropologist 92 (4): 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J.C. (1994). Fragments from Antiquity: archaeology of social life in Britain 2900-1200 BC, Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O. and Zilhão, J. (eds.) (2006). Towards a definition of the Aurignacian. Trabalhos de Arqueologia 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood, P. and Renfrew, A.C. (eds.) (2002). Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard-Knapp, A. (1992). Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R.L. and Eerkens, J.W. (1999). Point typologies, cultural transmission and the spread of bow-and-arrow technology in the prehistoric Great Basin. American Antiquity 64: 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, P.F., Gramsch, A. and Marciniak, A. (eds.) (2002). Archäologien Europas. Geschichte, Methoden und Theorien, Waxmann, Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L.R. (1965). Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process. American Antiquity 31: 203–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L.R. (1972). An Archaeological Perspective, Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bintliff, J.L. (ed.) (1991). The Annales School and Archaeology, Leicester University Press, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R.J. (2007). The prehistory of Britain and Ireland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breniquet, C. (2006). La disparition de la culture de Halaf: les origines de la culture de Obeid dans le nord de la Mésopotamie, Etudes et Recherche sur les Civilisations, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhns, K.O. (1994). Ancient South America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumann, C. (1999). Writing for culture: Why a successful concept should not be disgarded. Current Anthropology 40: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, S. (2000). Archaeology and Migration: approaches to an archaeological proof of migration. Current Anthropology 41 (4): 539–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J.R. (1964). Interaction spheres in prehistory. In J.R. Caldwell and R.L. Hall (eds.) Hopewellian studies, Illinois State Museum Papers 12, Springfield, pp. 133–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C. (ed.) (1995). Migration and the movement of southwestern peoples. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 14 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. and Feldman, M.W. (1981). Cultural Transmission and Evolution: a quantitative approach, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, D. (2003). Archaeology in the Third World: A History of Indian Archaeology since 1947, D.K. Printworld, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.C. (1987). The Archaeology of Ancient China, 4th edition, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (1997). The impact of modern invasions and migrations on archaeological explanation. In J. Chapman and H. Hamerow, (eds.) Migrations and Invasions in Archaeological Explanation, British Archaeological Reports International Series 664, Oxford, pp. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. and Hamerow, H. (ed.) (1997). Migrations and Invasions in Archaeological Explanation. British Archaeological Reports (International Series) 664, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernykh, E.N. (1992). Ancient Metallurgy in the USSR: the Early Metal Age, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V.G. (1929). The Danube in Prehistory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V.G. (1956). Piecing together the Past, Routledge and Kegan, Paul London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikhi, L., Nichols, R.A., Barbujani, G. & Beaumont, M.A. (2002). Y genetic data support the Neolithic demic diffusion model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 11008–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D.L. (1968). Analytical Archaeology, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1988). The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colledge, S., Conolly, J. and Shennan, S. (2005). The Evolution of Neolithic Farming from SW Asian Origins to NW European limits. European Journal of Archaeology 8(2): 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. (2006). Archaeology and the biomolecular ‘revolution’: too much of the wrong kind of data. Reuvenslezing 18, Stichting voor de Nederlandse Archeologie, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, J. (2003). The Celts: Origins, Myths and Inventions, Tempus, Stroud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. and Hastorf, C.A. (eds.) (1990). The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conolly, J. and Lake, M. (2006). Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conolly, J., Colledge, S. and Shennan, S. (2008). Founder effect, drift, and adaptive change in domestic crop use in early Neolithic Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(10): 2797–2804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, B. (2005). Iron Age Communities in Britain: an account of England, Scotland and Wales from the Seventh Century BC until the Roman Conquest. 4th edition, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Maret, P. (1990). Phases and facies in the archaeology of central Africa. In P. Robertshaw, (ed.) A History of African Archaeology, James Currey, London, pp. 109–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demoule, J.-P., Giligny, F., Lehoërff, A. and Schnapp, A. (2005). Guide des méthodes de l’archéologie, La Découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demoule, J.-P. (2008). Les origines de la culture: la révolution néolithique, Editions, Le Pommier Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demakopoulou, K., Eluère, C., Jensen, J., Jockenhovel, A. and Mohen, J-P. (1999). Gods and Heroes of the European Bronze Age, Thames and Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Andreu, M. and Champion, T. (1996). Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe, UCL Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Andreu, M., Lucy, S., Babic, S. and Edwards, D. (2005). The Archaeology of Identity. Approaches to gender, age, ethnicity, status and religion, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietler, M. and Herbich, I. (1998). Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In M.T. Stark (ed.) The archaeology of social boundaries, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 232–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R.M.W. (1997). The rise and fall of languages, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J.E. (2000). Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-A. and J. Robb (2005). “Doing” Agency: Introductory Remarks on Methodology, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12(3): 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolukhanov, P. (1995). Archaeology in Russia and archaeological theory. In Ucko, P.J. (ed.) Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, Routledge, London, pp. 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornan, J.L. (2002). Agency and Archaeology: past, present and future directions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9 (4): 303–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J.W. and Lipo, C.P. (2005). Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the general variation in material culture and the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24: 316–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J.W. and Lipo, C.P. (2007). Cultural Transmission Theory and the archaeological record: providing context to understanding variation and temporal changes in material culture. Journal of Archaeological Research 15: 239–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, M.K.H. (2001). Prähistorische Archäologie. Konzepte und Methoden, A. Francke Verlag, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (1996). Archaeology against the state: the roots of internationalism. In Graves-Brown, P., Jones, S., and Gamble, C. (eds). Cultural identity and archaeology: the construction of European communities, Routledge, London, pp. 312–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenhausen, L. von. (1995). The regionalist paradigm in Chinese archaeology. In P.L. Kohl and C. Fawcett (eds.) Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 198–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, K.L. (2007). Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, A. (1996). ‘Celtic’ Iron Age Europe: the theoretical basis. In Graves-Brown, P., Jones, S., and Gamble, C. (eds). Cultural identity and archaeology: the construction of European communities, Routledge, London, 238–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K.V. (1982). The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist 84 (2): 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funari, P.P., Zarankin, A. and Stovel, E. (eds.) (2005). Global Archaeological Theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts, Kluwer/Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A. (2004). Agency Uncovered: Archaeological Perspectives on Social Agency, Power, and Being Human, UCL Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, W. (2003). Pattern Recognition, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, W. and Gladwin, H.S. (1934). A Method for Designation of Cultures and their Variations, Medallion Papers 15, Globe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves-Brown, P., Jones, S. and Gamble, C. (1996). Cultural identity and archaeology: the construction of European communities, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, W. and Doershuk, J.F. (1998). Cultural Resource Management and American Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 6 (2): 121–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habu, J. (2004). Ancient Jomon of Japan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakenbeck, S.E. (2007). Situational ethnicity and nested identities: New approaches to an old problem. Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History 14: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D.R. (1994). The Archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: contemporary perspectives, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegmon, M. (1992). Archaeological Research on Style. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 517–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1978a).Spatial correlations between material culture and society: a review. In I. Hodder (ed.) The Spatial Organisation of Culture, Duckworth, London, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1978b).The spatial structure of material ‘cultures’: a review of some of the evidence. In I. Hodder (ed.) The Spatial Organisation of Culture, Duckworth, London, pp. 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in action. Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1990). The Domestication of Europe, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (ed.) (1991). Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (2001). Archaeological Theory Today, Polity Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. and Hutson, S. (2003). Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. and Orton, C. (1976). Spatial analysis in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, M.J. (2006). Pots not People. Critique of Anthropology 26 (4): 411–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1994). Preface. In T. Ingold (ed.) Companion encyclopaedia of anthropology: humanity, culture and social life, xiii-xxii, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insoll, T. (2007). The Archaeology of Identities: a reader, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izzet, V. (2007). The Archaeology of Etruscan society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1999). Archaeological Theory: an introduction, WileyBlackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (1997). The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, S. (ed.) (2003). The Politics of Archaeology and Identity in a Global Context, Archaeological Institute of America, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, A. (1924). An Introduction to the Study of Southwestern Archaeology, with a Preliminary Account of the Excavations at Pecos, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. and Underhill, P.A. (2002). Congruent distribution of Neolithic painted pottery and ceramic figurines with Y-chromosome lineages. Antiquity 76: 707–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klejn, L. (1982). Archaeological Typology, British Archaeological Reports 153, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1936). Some reflections on the method and theory of the Kulturkreislehre. American Anthropologist 38(2): 157–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P.L. (1978). The balance of trade in Southwestern Asia during the mid-third millennium BC. Current Anthropology 19: 463–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P.L. (1989). The Use and Abuse of World Systems Theory: The Case of the ‘Pristine’ West Asian State. In C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (ed.) Archaeological Thought in America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 218–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P.L. (1993). Nationalism, politics and the practice of archaeology in Soviet Transcaucasia. Journal of European Archaeology 1 (2): 181–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P.L. (2007). The Making of Bronze Age Eurasia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P.L. (2008). Shared social fields: evolutionary convergence in prehistory and contemporary practice. American Anthropologist 110 (4): 495–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P.L. and Fawcett, C. (eds.) (1995). Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P.L. and Pérez Gollan, J.A. (2002). Religion, politics and prehistory: reassessing the lingering legacy of Oswald Menghin. Current Anthropology 43 (4): 561–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T.A. and van der Leeuw, S.E. (eds.) (2007). The Model-Based Archaeology of Socio-natural Systems, SAR Press, Santa Fe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koryakova, L. (2002). Present day Russian archaeology and the outside world. In Biehl, P.F., Gramsch, A. and Marciniak, A. (eds.) Archäologien Europas. Geschichte, Methoden und Theorien, Waxmann, Münster, pp. 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koryakova, L.N. and Epimakhov, A.V. (2007). The Urals and Western Siberia in the Bronze and Iron Ages, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossinna, G. (1911). Die Herkunft der Germanen. Zur Methode der Siedlungsarchäologie, Kabitzsch, Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossinna, G. (1926). Ursprung und Verbreitung der Germanen in vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Zeit, Kabitzsch, Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K. (2008). Does the ‘archaeology of Europe’ exist? Archaeological Dialogues 15 (1): 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K. and Larsson, T.L. (2005). The Rise of Bronze Age Society: travels, transmissions and transformations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A.L. (1923). Anthropology, Harcourt, Brace New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A.L. (1935). Preface. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 37: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A.L. (1940). Stimulus diffusion. American Anthropologist 42: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, E. (ed.) (2008). Movement, Mobility and Migration. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 23 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. (2005). The Chinese Neolithic: Trajectories to Early States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R.L., O’Brien, M.J. and Dunnell, R.C. (1997). The Rise and Fall of Culture History, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEachern, S. (2000). Genes, Tribes and African History. Current Anthropology 41(3): 357–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKern, W.C. (1939). The Midwestern Taxonomic Method as an aid to archaeological culture study. American Antiquity 4: 301–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (1998). Archaeology under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. and Preucel, R.W. (eds.) (2006). A Companion to Social Archaeology, WileyBlackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A. and M. J. O’Brien (2008a). The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile point technology I: an experimental simulation. American Antiquity 73: 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., and M. J. O’Brien (2008b). The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile- point technology II: an agent-based computer simulation. American Antiquity 73: 627–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscati, S. (1991). The Celts, Bompiani, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. (ed.) (2001). The Encyclopedia of Archaeology: History and Discoveries, ABC/CLIO, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustupný, E. (1982). Prehistoric migrations by infiltration. Archeologické Rozhledy 34: 278–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J. (2008). Cultural Transmission and Archaeology, Society for American Archaeology Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J. and Lyman, R.L. (2009). Darwin and Historical Archaeology. In D. Gaimster and T. Majewski (eds). International Handbook of Historical Archaeology, Springer, New York, pp. 227–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J. and Shennan, S.J. (eds.) (2009). Innovation in Cultural Systems Contributions from Evolutionary Anthropology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, S. 2006. The Origins of the British, Robinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C.E. (2003). Race and Practice in Archaeological Interpretation, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. (ed.) (2008). Tradition. World Archaeology 40 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. and G. R. Willey. (1953). Method and theory in American archaeology: An operational basis for culture-historical integration. American Anthropologist 55(5): 615–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piggott, S. (1965). Ancient Europe from the beginnings of agriculture to classical antiquity, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, S. (1983). Analysis of style of artefacts. Annual Review of Anthropology 12: 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pluciennik, M. (1999). Archaeological narratives and other ways of telling. Current Anthropology 40: 653–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis, G. (2003). The theoretical landscape and the methodological developments of archaeology in Latin American, American Antiquity 68 (2): 247–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutignat, P. and Streiff-Fenart, J. (1999). Théories de l’ethnicité, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, R.W. and Hodder, I. (1996). Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: a reader, Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, A.C. (1973). Before Civilization: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe, Pelican, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, A.C. (1977). Space, Time and Polity. In M.J. Rowlands and J. Friedman (eds.) The Evolution of Social Systems, Duckworth, London, pp. 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, A.C. (1987). Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins, Pimlico, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, A.C. and Bahn, P. (2008). Archaeology: Theories, Method and Practice, 5th edition, Thames and Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, A.C. and Cherry, J.F. (1986). Peer polity interaction and socio-political change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. (2003). The Neolithic invasion of Europe. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 135–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, I.B. (1986). Migrations in Prehistory, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J.R. (1982). Approaches to Style in Lithic Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J.R. (1985). Style and Ethnicity in the Kalahari: A Reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity 50: 154–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B. (1976). Behavioural Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B. and Skibo, J.M. (1997). The Explanation of Artifact Variability. American Antiquity 62: 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, B. (1995). Les Indo-Européens. Histoire, langues, mythes, Payot, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. (1989a). Introduction. In S. Shennan (ed.) Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity, Unwin-Hyman, London, pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. (1989b). Cultural transmission and culture change. In van der Leeuw, S.E. and Torrence, R. (eds.), What’s new? A closer look at the process of innovation, One World Archaeology 14, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 330–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. (2000). Population, Culture History and the Dynamics of Culture Change. Current Anthropology 41: 811–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S.J. and Wilkinson, J.R. (2001). Ceramic style change and neutral evolution: A case study from Neolithic Europe. American Antiquity 66 (4): 577–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, A.G. (1993). What would a Bronze Age world system look like? Relations between temperate Europe and the Mediterranean in later prehistory. Journal of European Archaeology 1 (2): 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M.T. (1998). Introduction. In M.T. Stark (ed.) The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M.T., Horne, L. and Bowser, B.J. (eds.) (2008). Cultural Transmission and Material Culture: Breaking Down Boundaries, University of Arizona Press, Tuscon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. (1948). A Study of Archaeology, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, C. P. and Schurr, T.G. (2004a). Genes, Language, and Culture: An Example from the Tarim Basin. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 23(1): 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, C.P. and Schurr, T.G. (2004b). Prehistoric ‘Europeans’ in Xinjiang?: A case for multiple interpretations. In H. Bolin (ed.) The Interplay of Past and Present, Södertörn Archaeological Studies 1, Stockholm, pp. 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (1990). The history of African archaeology in world perspective. In P. Robertshaw, (ed.), A History of African Archaeology, James Currey, London, pp. 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (2006). A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsude, H. (1995). Archaeological theory in Japan. In Ucko, P.J. (ed.) Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, Routledge, London, pp. 298–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucko, P. (ed.) (1995). Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Pool, T.L. and Van Pool, C.S. (2003). Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Pool, C.S. (2008). Agents and Cultural Transmission. In M.J. O’Brien (ed.) Cultural Transmission and Archaeology: Some Fundamental Issues, Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C., pp. 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit, U. (1989). Ethnic Concepts in German Prehistory: A Case Study on the Relationship between Cultural Identity and Archaeological Objectivity. In S. Shennan (ed.), Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity, Unwin-Hyman, London, pp. 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. (1997). Su Bingqi and contemporary Chinese archaeology, with an annotated translation of Su’s paper “Hua people - descendants of the dragon - Chinese: an archaeological seeking for roots”. Antiquity 71: 31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. and Gillings, M. (2002). Spatial technology and archaeology: the archaeological applications of GIS, Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A. (1996). Europe in the Neolithic: the Creation of New Worlds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 48: 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1984). Reconsidering the behavioural basis for style: a case study among the Kalahari San. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 3: 190–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1985). Style or isochrestic variation? A reply to Sackett. American Antiquity 50 (1): 160–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1990). Is there unity to style? In M. Conkey and C. Hastorf (eds.) The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, G.R. and. Phillips, P. (1958). Method and theory in American archaeology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E.R. (1984). Culture: Panacea or Problem? American Antiquity 49 (2): 393-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E.R. (1994). Perilous Ideas: Race, Culture and People. Current Anthropology, 35(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (2002). Revisiting Interaction Spheres: Social Boundaries and Technologies on Inner and Outermost Frontiers. Iranica Antiqua 37: 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyszomirska-Werbart, B. and Barford, P. (eds.) (1996). The concept of archaeological cultures. Archaeologia Polona 34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This volume derives originally from a conference session What is an Archaeological Culture? Approaching cultural transmission and variation held at the 13th European Association of Archaeologist meeting in Zadar, Croatia on 18–23 September 2007. We are very grateful to the speakers and those who attended the session. We are also very grateful to Cate Frieman and Chris Thornton for reading and commenting on this chapter. Any errors remain entirely our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin W. Roberts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roberts, B.W., Linden, M.V. (2011). Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability, and Transmission. In: Roberts, B., Vander Linden, M. (eds) Investigating Archaeological Cultures. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6970-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics