Skip to main content

Monitoring nuclear weapons1

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Watching Earth from Space

Part of the book series: Springer Praxis Books ((SPACEE))

  • 2106 Accesses

Abstract

America’s first space program was to develop surveillance satellites to monitor the nuclear arsenals of the Soviet Union and its allies. Although the Cold War has ended, nuclear weapons remain a threat to world peace and surveillance satellites are still an important tool in monitoring them. A recent US policy statement on the subject stated that “The threat of nuclear war has become remote but the risk of nuclear attack has increased”.2 An all-out nuclear exchange between the USA and Russia looks very unlikely, but nuclear weapons are now held by nine countries, some in areas of the world where the threat of war is high. 3 Recent calculations suggest that a nuclear war between regional powers could cause a decade-long global winter, with a death toll of about a billion (mostly among those who live on marginal food supplies).4

1 I am indebted for most of the post-Cold War material in this chapter to Robert Kelley, formerly a nuclear weapons expert from the USA who did weapons inspections for the International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) Action Team and the Department of Safeguards and now an Affiliated Senior Research Associate at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Gates R. M. (2010) Nuclear Posture Review Report,US Department of Defense, April, Preface.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robock A. and Toon O. B. (2010) Local Nuclear War, Global Suffering, Scientific American,January, 302(1), 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA Secretariat (2006) Strengthening the Effectiveness and Improving the Efficiency of the Safeguards System Including Implementation of Additional Protocols (Vienna, Austria: IAEA), GC(50)2, August 7th.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA Secretariat (2009) Annual Report 2008(Vienna, Austria: IAEA), GC(53)7, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad W. J. (2010) Research Reactors a Safety Challenge, New York Times,April 13th, New York Edition, D3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathke C. G. et al.(2009) The Attractiveness of Materials in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles for Various Proliferation and Theft Scenarios, Proceedings of Global 2009,Paris, France, September 6–11th, Paper 9543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes R. (1986) The Making of the Atomic Bomb(New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins G. P. (2007) Kim's Big Fizzle: The Physics behind a Nuclear Dud, Scientific American, 296(1), 8–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer D. (1997) History of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the First Forty Years(Vienna, Austria: IAEA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner K. (2009) Mind What You Say on your Mobile, New Scientist,December 18th. Langewiesche W. (2005) The Wrath of Khan: How A. Q. Khan Made Pakistan a Nuclear Power and Showed that the Spread of Atomic Weapons Can't Be Stopped, The Atlantic, 296(4), 62–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid A. (2009) Descent into Chaos: The World's Most Unstable Region and the Threat to Global Security(London: Penguin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen B. R. (2000) US Security Policy in a Nuclear-Armed World, or What If Iraq Had Had Nuclear Weapons, in Utgoff V. A. (ed.), The Coming Crisis: Nuclear Proliferation, US Interests, and World 0rder(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad W. J. and Sanger D. (2007) With Eye on Iran, Rivals Also Want Nuclear Power, New York Times,April 15th, Late Edition—Final, 1,1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J. (2009) How Iran Could Save the Middle East, The Atlantic,July/August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David A. (2010) Ballistic Boost: Iran Displays New Rocket Mock-Up, but Views Differ on its Potential Threat, Aviation Week & Space Technology,February 15th, 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opall-Rome B. (2010) Israeli Missile Experts: Simorgh Sets Iran on Path to ICBM, Space News,February 15th, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright D. and Brannon P. (2010) Suspect Reactor Construction Site in Eastern Syria: The Site of the September 6 Israeli Raid? The Institute for Science and International Security, October 23rd, available online at www.isis-online.org/ Publications/SuspectSite_24October2007.pdf.

  • Reed T. C. and Stillman D. B. (2009) The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and its Proliferation(Minneapolis, MN: Zenith Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris P. (2007) Spies in the Sky(Chichester, UK: Springer-Praxis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Covault C. (2007e) Spy vs. Spy: Israeli Space-Based Radar Set for Indian Launch as Pentagon's New Commercial Recon Poised for Vandenberg Flight, Aviation Week & Space Technology,September 17th, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opall-Rome B. (2009) Ofeq-8 Nearing Launch, Ofeq-9 Stalled, Space News,November 16th, A3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R. (2009) Remote Sensing Policy,in Warner T., Ellis M., and Foody G. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Remote Sensing(London: SAGE Publications), 2, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prober R. (2003) Shutter Control: Confronting Tomorrow's Technology with Yesterday's Regulations, Journal of Law and Politics,Spring, 19, 203–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirard T. (2007) Taïwan: cap sur l'autonomie spatial, Air & Cosmos, November 9th, 2099, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Selding P. B. (2007a) France Sets its Sights on an Operational Elint System, Space News,June 18th.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avenhaus R., Kyriakopoulos N., Michel M., and Stein G. (eds) (2006) Verifying Treaty Compliance: Limiting Weapons of Mass Destruction and Monitoring Kyoto Protocol Provisions(Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie R., Riggs P., Bragini V., Truong Q., Neville R., and Staenz K. (2002) Satellite Imagery for Safeguards Purposes: Utility of Panchromatic and Multispectral Imagery for Verification of Remote Uranium Mines, Annual Meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management,June, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA Secretariat (2007) IAEA Safeguards: Staying Ahead of the Game(Vienna, Austria: IAEA), July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer I. (2009) Perspectives of Satellite Imagery Analysis for Verifying the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty,in Jasani B., Niemeyer I., Nussbaum S., Richter B., and Stein D. (eds), International Safeguards and Satellite Imagery: Key Features of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Computer-Based Analysis(Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Norris, P. (2010). Monitoring nuclear weapons1 . In: Watching Earth from Space. Springer Praxis Books(). Praxis, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6938-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6938-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Praxis, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6937-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6938-5

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics