Skip to main content

The (Im)morality of War

Some Sociological Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3753 Accesses

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Though long a subject of consideration by historians, philosophers, and political scientists, the topic of war has only recently become of theoretical concern to sociological analysis. Treating war as a complex interaction process, this essay analyzes three dimensions of war and its bearing to modernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hans Joas, “The Modernity of War,” International Sociology,14,4 (1999:457–472). This was later expanded into a book, War and Modernity. Cambridge (UK): Polity and Malden, MA: Blackwell. 2003.

  2. 2.

    Philip Smith has recently (2005) applied a cultural sociology inspired by Durkheim to the study of modern war.

  3. 3.

    George W. Bush, Declaration of War, address to the Joint Session of Congress, September 20, 2001, http://www.britannica.com/presidents/article-9398253. The symmetry of this post-modern war is that for its alleged major architect, Osama bin Laden, there is no boundary to the war, in time or space.

  4. 4.

    http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Wilson’s_War_Message_to_Congress.

  5. 5.

    So for example, a 2005 report indicated that three years into the Iraq War, the bill for the United States was already over 204 billion dollars, a rate of spending of 5.6 billions monthly, excluding long-term costs of health care and disability payments to Iraq War veterans, and certainly exclusive of costs to the Iraqi civilians and their shattered economy (Jim Lobe, “Iraq War Costs Now Exceed Vietnam’s,” Inter Press Service, September 1, 2005 (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0901-02.htm). Even that figure probably underreports considerably the true costs of the Iraq War. See the more recent analysis of Nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz pointing to the Iraq War having total expenses (especially if care for the psychologically and physiologically wounded veterans are included) of three trillion dollars (Stiglitz and Bilmes 2008), or three times the amount which figure in the acrimonious debates over the government costs of health care reforms. It should be borne in mind that their detailed analysis did not foresee the new (2009) military engagement in Afghanistan under taken by the United States and its allies.

  6. 6.

    Collins applies this concept in dealing with violence to collective breakdown in normal social controls. I will return to his usage in a later section, but here I think it is also apt to cover breakdown of fiscal restraints.

  7. 7.

    Even Marx and his followers did not espouse war as the use of force. From that radical perspective, war was devalorized as the pitting of one capitalistic system against another, or one capitalistic system plundering a pre-capitalistic one for its resources. And later in the twentieth century with the proliferation of communist regimes holding different allegiances, the derided political observation that “democracies don’t fight each other” could be equally applied to including “communist regimes don’t fight each other.”

  8. 8.

    Edward Tiryakian, “Der Kosovo-Krieg und die Rolle der Vereingten Staaten,“ Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 11, 2 (2001): 201–216.

  9. 9.

    “Mobilization” in the rich sociological literature around it, particularly under the influence of Charles Tilly’s historical studies (From Mobilization to Revolution, 1978), has tended to be viewed as a popular collective movement against the state. Here I treat it as a popular movement for the state (and perhaps overtly if not covertly organized by the state).

  10. 10.

    Visits by Japanese Prime ministers to this shrine have raised controversy by both liberal Japanese and by those outside of Japan who recall the wartime conduct of the Japanese in China and elsewhere. What a military burial place signifies to whom has much collective emotional significance, which merits a separate treatment.

  11. 11.

    For a general listing of sites, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomb_of_the_Unknown_Soldier

  12. 12.

    This is perhaps duplicated in quotidian life by groups charged with public safety, like some police units and firefighters (Desmond 2007).

  13. 13.

    Durkheim amplified the discussion of his associates Henri Hubert and Marcel Mauss, Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964 (1899).

  14. 14.

    Wilson’s War Message to Congress, ibid.

  15. 15.

    http://www.americancatholic.org/Newsletters/CU/ac0883.asp

  16. 16.

    “Obama, Afghanistan, and the ‘just war’,”Crosscut, December 14,2009. http://crosscut.com/2009/12/14/rights-ethics/19440.

  17. 17.

    To be sure, the defense industry also seeks a complementary endeavor: to develop systems that avoid our side getting killed.

  18. 18.

    Casualty estimates vary greatly and civilian deaths due to war related causes are often underreported or omitted. For reasonable estimates of World War I and World War II in the aggregate and by countries, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

  19. 19.

    From the sack of Orthodox Constantinople by Christian crusaders in 1203 AD to the Protestant-Catholic wars of the 16th Century, to the Yugoslav Civil War in the 1990s pitting Orthodox Serbs against Catholic Croats, and to the internal deadly contemporary violence in Iraq between Shia and Sunni, general adherence in a common faith has not stood up as a restraint to killing.

  20. 20.

    “Individualism and the Intellectuals,” pp. 43–57 in Robert N. Bellah, ed., Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973 (1898).

  21. 21.

    I use “system” here following the usage of Lankford (2009) in his comparative analysis of four settings of extreme violence which turned ordinary beings into “killing machines”.

  22. 22.

    Being a member of a bureaucratic system that sanctions doing extreme violence to “the other” is a two-edged sword. If that system loses a war, occupants of positions in the bureaucracy, high or low, are subject to dire punishment for violence the system has committed, witness Adolf Eichmann at one end of the Nazi bureaucracy and John Demjanjuk at the other end.

  23. 23.

    Much of the ritual process involved in institutional isolation is discussed in Goffman’s insightful, Asylums (1962).

  24. 24.

    If we put the accent on the past 100 years, dehumanization has a much older history, going back no further than the British setting up concentration camps in the Boer War and Sherman’s “scorched earth” policy in the Civil War.

  25. 25.

    The “classical” torture experiments of Milgram at Yale (1974) and Zimbardo at Stanford (2007), aside from their ethical ambiguity, do not discuss short-term and long-term guilt effects on subjects.

  26. 26.

    “The Wider Shame of Walter Reed,” New York Times editorial, March 7, 2007.

  27. 27.

    In January 2010 the Veterans Affairs Department released figures showing in the two-year period 2005–2007 a 26% increase in the suicide rate of 18–29-year-old men who have left the military, along with a record increase in suicide in the military. The army suicide rate is now higher than that of the general American population for the first time since the highpoint of the Vietnam War.

  28. 28.

    “Just War,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_War.

  29. 29.

    http://www.icrc.org/web/Eng/siteengO.nsf/html/genevaconventions.

  30. 30.

    Michael Bothe, Karl Josef Partsch, Waldemar A. Solf, with the collaboration of Martin Eaton. New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: commentary on the two 1977 protocols additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (The Hague, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982), p. 280. Cited in James A. Stroble, 1996, The Ethics of War and the Uses of War, http://www.aloha.net/~stroble/Noncombatant.html.

  31. 31.

    “When war fever takes its grip, people’s instincts are to de-humanize the enemy and distance them from all moral norms,” Slim (op.cit:277).

  32. 32.

    For a readily available discussion of background materials, see “Osama bin Laden”, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden, last modified January 5, 2010.

  33. 33.

    As Major General Taguba placed in charge of investigating the Abu Ghraib reported afterwards, he only had access to lowly MPs, not those above: “I was legally prevented from further investigation into higher authority,” (Mayer 2008:334).

  34. 34.

    For example, how does one quantify the world wide loss of trust in the government of the United States and its British ally in the last decade? How does one quantify civilians and military exposed for the rest of their lives to PTSD?

References

  • Bar-Tal, D. 1997. “The Monopolization of Patriotism,” PP. 246–270 in Patriotism in the Lives of Individuals and Nations, edited by D. Bar-Tal, and E. Staub. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbitt, P. 2008. Terror and Consent. The Just Wars for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. 2008. For Love of a Soldier. Interviews with Military Families Taking Action Against the Iraq War. Lanham, MD: Lexington/ Rowman& Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. 2008. Violence. A Micro-Sociological Theory. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M. 2007. On the Fireline: Living and Dying with Wildland Firefighters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C. J. 1948. Inevitable Peace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gat, A. 2006. War in Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, K. J., and J. L. Dratel, eds., Introduction by Anthony Lewis. 2005. The Torture Papers. The Road to Abu Ghraib. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. 1249 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, D. 1996. On Killing. The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, V., ed. 2009. Handbook of Public Sociology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. 1999. “The Modernity of War: Modernization Theory and the Problem of Violence,” International Sociology 14(4):457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, A. 2009. Human Killing Machines. Systematic Indoctrination in Iran, Nazi German, Al Qaeda, and Abu Ghraib. Lanham, MD: Lexington/Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, J. 2008. Sorry States. Apologies in International Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy. Explaining Ethnic Cleansing.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. L. A. 1978 (1947). Men Against Fire: the Problem of Battle Command in Future War. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. W., J. D. McCarthy, and C. McPhail, 2009. “Collective Violence: Why Targets Matter,” American Sociological Review 74(5) (October):821–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. 2008. The Dark Side. The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeogh, C. 2002. Innocent Civilians. The Morality of Killing in War. Houndmills, Hampshire (UK) and New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, S. P., with Roger Thompson. 2009. Beyond Duty. Life on the Frontline in Iraq. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., with Renée Fox and Victor Lidz. 1978. “‘The Gift of Life’ and Its Reciprocation,” PP. 264–299 in Action Theory and the Human Condition, edited by T. Parsons. New York: Free Press/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. S., ed. 2008. Peace not Terror. Leaders of the Antiwar Movement Speak Out Against U.S. Foreign Policy Post 9/11. Lanham, MD: Lexington/Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan-Miles, C. 2008. “What It Feels to Kill.” pp. 70–86 in Mary Susannah Robbins, Peace not Terror, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slim, H. 2008.Killing Civilians. Method, Madness and Morality in War. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. 2005. Why War? The Cutlural Logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., and L. J. Bilmes. 2008.The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiryakian, E. A. 1999. “War: The Covered Side of Modernity.” International Sociology 14(4):473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiryakian, E. A. 2005. “September 11 and the Actuality of Durkheim.” pp. 305–321 in Cambridge Companion of Durkheim, edited by J. Alexander, and P. Smith. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. W. 1995 (1966). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Emden, R. 2002. Last Man Standing. Norman Collins, The Memoirs of a Seaforth Highlander During the Great War. Barnsley, South Yorkshire (UK): Leo Cooper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Emden, R. 2006. Britain’s Last Tommies. Final Memories from Soldiers of the 1914–1918 War in Their Own Words. Barnsley, South Yorkshire (UK): Pen & Sword Military/Pen and Sword Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woehrle, L., P. G. Coy, and G. M. Maney, 2008. Contesting Patriotism. Culture, Power, and Strategy in the Peace Movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. 2007. The Lucifer Effect. How Good People Turn Evil. London: Rider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. 2008. “What War Looks Like.” PP. 51–54 in Peace not Terror, edited by M. S. Robbins. op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward A. Tiryakian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tiryakian, E.A. (2010). The (Im)morality of War. In: Hitlin, S., Vaisey, S. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics