Collective Efficacy

  • Stephen J. Zaccaro
  • Virginia Blair
  • Christopher Peterson
  • Michelle Zazanis
Part of the The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology book series (SSSC)

Abstract

One’s perceptions or beliefs about expected competency in an achievement domain are a critical determinant of motivation and performance. Constructs that incorporate such beliefs and have been tied to successful performance include effectance motivation (White, 1959), personal causation (DeCharms, 1968), locus of control (Rotter, 1966), intrinsic motivation (Deci, 1975), explanatory style (Peterson & Seligman, 1984), personal control (Greenberger & Strasser, 1986), and self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977, 1982, 1986). A common component across these constructs is a self-perceived performance mastery that governs choices within an achievement domain and “encourages intellectual, emotional, behavioral, and physiological vigor in the face of challenge” (Peterson & Stunkard, 1989, p. 820).

Keywords

Depression Hunt Dura Bedding Dunham 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakeman, R., & Helmreich, R. (1975). Cohesiveness and performance: Covariation and cau-sality in an underseas environment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 478–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bales, R. F, Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T., & Roseborough, M.E. (1951). Channels of communica-tion in small groups. American Social Review, 16, 461–468.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A., & Jourden, E J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (6), 941–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 805–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barling, J., & Beattie, R. (1983). Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press. Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123–138.Google Scholar
  10. Cartwright, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory ( 3rd ed., pp 91–109 ). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Earley, P. C., & Lituchy, T. B. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects: A test of three models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eden, D. (1988). Pygmalion, goal setting, and expectancy: Compatible ways to boost productivity. Academy of Management Review, 13, 639–652.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, M. G. (1970). The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goal relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans, M. G. (1974). Extensions of a path-goal theory of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farris, G. F., & Lim, F. G. (1969). Effects of performance on leadership, cohesiveness, influence, satisfaction, and subsequent performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 490–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and func-tional interpretation. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 245–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fleishman, E. A., & Reilly, M. (1991). Human Abilities: Their definition, measurement, and job task requirements. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fleishman, E. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 31–56 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  22. Florin, P., Giamartino, G. A., Kenny, D. A., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Levels of analysis and effects: Clarifying group influence and climate by separating individual and group effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 881–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forsyth, D. (1990). Group dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  24. Fulk, J., & Wendler, E. R. (1982). Dimensionality of leader-subordinate interactions: A path-goal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibb, C. A. (1951). An experimental approach to the study of leadership. Occupational Psychol-ogy, 25, 233–248.Google Scholar
  26. Gilbert, J., Zaccaro, S. J., Zazanis, M., & De Miranda, G. ( 1992, August). Different forms of cohesiveness as substitutes for leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12, 472–485.Google Scholar
  28. Greenberger, D. B., & Strasser, S. (1986). Development and application of a model of personal control in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 164–177.Google Scholar
  29. Greenberger, D. B., Strasser, S., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). The impact of personal control on performance and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenberger, D. B., Strasser, S., & Lee, S. (1988). Personal control as a mediator between perceptions of supervisory behaviors and employee reactions. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gross, N., & Martin, W. E. (1953). On group cohesiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 57, 546–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guzzo, R. A. (1986). Group decision making and group effectiveness in organizations. In P. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 34–71 ). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 8 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hodges, L., & Canon, A. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 48–59.Google Scholar
  35. Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N. R. F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. House, R. J., & Dressler, G. (1974). The path-goal theory of leadership: some post hoc and a priori tests. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Contingency approaches to leadership (pp. 29–55 ). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  38. House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81–97.Google Scholar
  39. Indik, B. P. (1965). Organization size and member participation: Some empirical tests of alternative explanations. Human Relations, 18, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jackson, J. M., & Harkins, S. G. (1985). Equity in effort: An explanation of the social loafing effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kane, T. D., Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Blair, V. W. ( 1993, March). The moderating effects of attributional style on goal theory processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  42. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations,(2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Kenny, D. A. (1985). The generalized group effect model. In J. Nesselroade & A. Von Eye(Eds.) Individual development and social change (pp. 343–351). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  44. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kenny, D. A., & Stigler, J. (1983). Program Level: A Fortran program for group-individual analysis. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 606.Google Scholar
  46. Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivationallosses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Larson, C. E., & LaFasto, E. M. J. (1989). Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laughlin, P., Branch, L., & Johnson, H. (1969). Individual versus triadic performance on unidimensional complementary tasks as a function of initial ability level. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. American Review of Psychology, 41, 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1991). Culture and socialization in work groups. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  53. Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Mesch, D. J., Farh, J., & Podsakoff, P. M. ( 1989, August). Effects of feedback sign on group goal setting, strategies, and performance: An empirical examination of some control theory hypotheses. Paper presented to the Organizational Behavior Division at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  56. Milliken, F. J., & Vollrath, D. A. (1991). Strategic decision-making tasks and group effectiveness: Insights from theory and research on small group performance. Human Relations, 44, 1229–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 15, pp. 137–192 ). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1989). Newcomers and oldtimers in small groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence(2nd ed., pp.143–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Mowday, R. T. (1978). The exercise of upward influence in organizations Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mowday, R. T. (1979). Leader characteristics, self-confidence, and methods of upward influ-ence in organizational decision situations. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nadler, D. A. (1979). The effects of feedback on task-group behavior: A review of the experimental research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 309–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes perfor-mance hypothesis. Academy of Management Review, 2, 46–53.Google Scholar
  63. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
  64. Peterson, D., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1984). Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression: Theory and evidence. Psychological Review, 91, 347–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Peterson, C., & Stunkard, A. (1989). Personal control and health promotion. Social Science Medicine, 26, 819–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reddy, W. B., & Byrnes, A. (1972). The effects of interpersonal group composition on the problem-solving behavior of middle managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 516–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (3), 774–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  70. Schlenker, B. R. (1975). Group members’ attributions of responsibility for prior group performance. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6, 96–108.Google Scholar
  71. Schlenker, B. R., & Miller, R. S. (1977). Group cohesiveness as a determinant of egocentric perceptions in cooperative groups. Human Relations, 11, 1039–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schutz, W. C. (1955). What makes groups productive? Human Relations, 8, 465–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  74. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  75. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  76. Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Groups as human resources. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, (Vol. 5, pp. 323–356 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  77. Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Simkin, D. K., Lederer, J. P., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1983). Learned helplessness in groups Behavior Research and Therapy, 21, 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  80. Spink, K. S. (1990a). Collective efficacy in the sport setting. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 380–395.Google Scholar
  81. Spink, K. S. (1990b). Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 301–311.Google Scholar
  82. Steiner, I. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  83. Staw, B. M. (1984). Organizational behavior: A review and reformulation of the field’s outcome variables. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 627–666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stinson, J. E., & Johnson, T. W. (1975). The path-goal theory of leadership: A partial test and suggested refinement. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, ( 2nd ed., pp. 7–24 ). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  86. Taylor, M. S., Locke, E. A., Lee, C., & Gist, M. E. (1984). Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 402–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence ( 2nd ed., pp. 233–275 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  88. Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. ( 1988, August). A theory of group goals and group performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  89. Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32 (4), 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Whetten, D. A. (1987). Organizational growth and decline processes. American Review of Sociology, 13, 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. White, R. E. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence Psychological Review, 66, 247–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Widmeyer, W. N. (1990). Group composition in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 264–285.Google Scholar
  93. Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570–581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wood, R., Bandura, A,. & Bailey, T. (1990). Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decision-making environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 46, 181–201.Google Scholar
  96. Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organizations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  97. Zaccaro, S. J. (1984). Social loafing: The role of task attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Gilbert, J. A. (1992). Collective control: Causes and consequences of group members’ beliefs about group competence Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  99. Zaccaro, S. J., & McCoy, M. C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zaccaro, S. J., Peterson, C., Blair, V. W., & Gilbert, J. ( 1990, August). Some antecedents and consequences of collective control. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  101. Zaccaro, S. J., Peterson, C., & Walker, S. (1987). Self-serving attributions for individual and group performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zander, A. (1971). Motives and goals in groups. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Zaccaro
    • 1
  • Virginia Blair
    • 1
  • Christopher Peterson
    • 2
  • Michelle Zazanis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations