The Role of the Third Sector in the Netherlands

  • Paul Dekker
Part of the Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies book series (NCSS)


Current international discussions about a special contribution of the third or nonprofit sector to the solution of mass unemployment and related problems of social integration are somewhat peculiar from a Dutch perspective for at least two reasons. The first is that there is no mass unemployment and the second is that there is nothing special about the nonprofit sector. Discussions about the labour market and the nonprofit sector in the Netherlandswere until the middle of the year 2002 about (public and nonprofit) education and health care being seriously understaffed and about how to make employment in these areas more attractive. Because of the economic recession and rising unemployment this is now seen as a less severe problem, and in 2003 there is some discussion about the negative effects of cuts in public spending, also for special jobs and reintegration programmes for long-term unemployed, but no debate about a positive role of the nonprofit sector to fight mass unemployment.


Labour Market Civil Society Welfare State Voluntary Work Nonprofit Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anheier, H. and J. Kendall (eds) (2001). Third sector policy at the crossroads. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (1999). Modell Bürgerarbeit. In: Ulrich Beck et al., Schöne neue Arbeitswelt. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  3. Burger, A. and P. Dekker (with T. van der Ploeg and W. van Veen) (2001). The nonprofit sector in The Netherlands. Den Haag: Social and Cultural Planning Office [working paper 70; also available from:].Google Scholar
  4. Dekker, P. (2001). Die Niederlande. In: C. Groth and W. Maennig (eds), Strategien gegen Jugendarbeitslosigkeit im internationalen Vergleich. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  5. Dekker, P. (2002). On the prospects of volunteering in civil society. Voluntary Action — The Journal of the Institute for Volunteering Research 4/3 (Summer): 31–48.Google Scholar
  6. Dekker, P. and A. van den Broek (1998). Civil society in comparative perspective. Voluntas 8 /1: 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Salamon, L.M., Anheier, H.K. et al. (1999). Global civil society. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.Google Scholar
  9. SCP (2001). The Netherlands in a European perspective. Den Haag: Social and Cultural Planning Office.Google Scholar
  10. Van der Pennen, T. Looking for a conceptual frame. In: Local Socio-economic strategies. Dortmund: Institut für Landes- und Stadtentwicklungsplanung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. Van Til, J. (2000). Growing civil society. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Wuthnow, Robert (1998). Loose connections. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Zimmer, A. (2001). Corporatism revisited. In: Anheier and Kendall (2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Dekker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations