Skip to main content

The Ecosystem Idea and Ideal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Protected Land

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Environmental Management ((SSEM))

Abstract

American attitudes regarding the protection of natural resources, wilderness, and recreation areas have undergone dramatic changes in the past two centuries, and our current disposition can be understood only in this historical perspective. It is perhaps not surprising that the science of ecology came of age in America at the same time as the conservation movement, but what is surprising is that these two fields have not always informed – or even associated with – one another. Evolutionary ecology in particular has had an uneasy relationship with the policy and practice of ecosystem protection, meaning that the understanding of species assembly and the management of ecosystem succession have not always been in lockstep. This chapter is a sketch of key ideas that have contributed to American ecosystem management in policy and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Botkin, D. B. 1990. Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-first Century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P. J. 1993. The Norton History of the Environmental Sciences. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F. E. 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington: Carnegie Institution.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. 1986. Evolution into ecology? The strategy of Warming’s ecological plant geography. Journal of the History of Biology 19:181–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, H. 1901. The physiographic ecology of Chicago and vicinity: a study of the origin, development, and classification of plant societies (concluded). Botanical Gazette 31:145–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. P., and Cunningham, M. A. 2009. Principles of Environmental Science, Inquiry and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. R. 1985. The American Conservation Movement: John Muir and his Legacy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. J. 1996. Textbook misconceptions: the climax concept of succession. The American Biology Teacher 58(3):135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Torrey Botanic Club Bulletin 53:7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H. 1987. A letter from Dr. Gleason. Brittonia 39:205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golley, F. 1996. A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More than the Sum of the Parts. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D. 2005. Dynamic conservation easements: facing the problem of perpetuity in land conservation. Seattle University Law Review 28:883–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. 1998. Seeds of ecosystem management in Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:757–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J. 1988. Organism and environment: Frederic Clements’s vision of a unified physiological ecology. In The American Development of Biology, ed. Rainger, R., Benson, K. R., and Maienschein, J., pp. 257–280. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J. 1992. An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Springs Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 22:415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? The American Naturalist 93:145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Ecosystem Management Task Force. 1995. The Ecosystem Approach: Healthy Ecosystems and Sustainable Economies. Vols. I–III. Washington: White House Council on Environmental Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W., and Salisbury, F., eds. 1972. Botany: An Ecological Approach. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. W., and Odum, E. P. 1956. Breeding bird populations in relation to plant succession on the piedmont of Georgia. Ecology 37(1):50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, S., Bastianoni, S., Fath, B., and Muller, F. 2007. A New Ecology: Systems Perspective. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapustka, L., and Landis, W. 1998. Ecology: the science versus the myth. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 4:829–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesecker, J., Comendant, T., Grandmason, T., Gray, E., Hall, C., Hilsenbeck, R., Kareiva, P., Lozier, L., Naehu, P., and Rissman, A. 2007. Conservation easements in context: a quantitative analysis of their use by The Nature Conservancy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kricher, J. 2009. The Balance of Nature: Ecology’s Enduring Myth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1921. The wilderness and its place in forest recreational policy. Journal of Forestry 19:718–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1924. Grass, brush, timber, and fire in southern Arizona. Journal of Forestry 22:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1941. Wilderness as a land laboratory. Living Wilderness 6:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A., and Schwartz, C. W. 1966. A Sand County Almanac, with Other Essays on Conservation from Round River. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. S., Cain, S., Cottam, C., Gabrielson, I., and Kimball, T. 1963. Wildlife management in the national parks. American Forests April:32–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., and Paine, R. 1974. Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 71:2744–2747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, R. 1942. The trophic dynamic concept in ecology. Ecology 23:399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R. 1963. On certain unifying principles in ecology. American Naturalist 97:357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. 1930. The problem of the wilderness. The Scientific Monthly 30:141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, N. 2005. Conservation easements: a troubled adolescence. Journal of Land, Resources, and Environmental Law 26:47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine, C. 1988. Aldo Leopold: His Life and Work. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. 2001. Gifford Pinchot and the Making of Modern Environmentalism. Washington: Island Press/Shearwater Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, J. 1901. Our National Parks. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, M. 1990. Henry Allan Gleason and the individualistic hypothesis – the structure of a botanists career. Botanical Review 56:91–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. 2001. Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (with full military honors, of course!). Ecology 82:3275–3284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. 1953. Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. 1964. The new ecology. BioScience 14:14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. 1994. Ecological and General Systems: An Introduction to Systems Ecology. Niwot: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. 1976. Succession: an evolutionary interpretation. American Naturalist 110:107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, G. 1900. A Primer of Forestry. Part I: The Forest. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, G. 1937. The Training of a Forester. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, G., and Steen, H. K. 2001. The Conservation Diaries of Gifford Pinchot. Durham: Forest History Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyne, S. J. 1997. Fire in America: A Cultural History of Wildland and Rural Fire. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, W., Ackerman, E., Bates, M., Cain, S., Darling, F., Fogg J., Gill, T., Gillson, J., Hall, E., and Hubbs, C. 1963. A report by the Advisory Committee to the National Park Service on Research. Washington: National Academy of Sciences National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, K. 2005. Nonequilibrium Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, L. W. 1973. FLO: A Biography of Frederick Law Olmsted. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, R. W. 1997. Preserving Nature in the National Parks: A History. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1980. A succession of paradigms in ecology: essentialism to materialism and probabilism. Synthese 43:3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E., and Lease, G. 1995. Reinventing nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. H. 1988. Dreamers & Defenders: American Conservationists. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16:284–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDI. 1970. Administrative Policies for Natural Areas of the National Park System. Washington: National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, T. R. 2005. The American Wilderness: Reflections on Nature Protection in the United States. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warming, E., Balfour, I. B., Groom, P., and Vahl, M. 1909. Oecology of Plants: An Introduction to the Study of Plant-communities. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, A. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. The Journal of Ecology 35:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westman, W., and Peet, R. 1982. Robert H. Whittaker (1920–1980): the man and his work. Vegetatio 48:97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, P. 1979. Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation. The Botanical Review 45:229–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, T. 1995. John Muir: Apostle of Nature. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. E., and Frey, D. G., eds. 1965. The Quaternary of the United States: A Review Volume for the VII Congress of the International Association for Quaternary Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., and Loucks, O. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology 70:439–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. 1994. Human geography and the “new ecology”: the prospect and promise of ­integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84:108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas J. Spieles .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spieles, D.J. (2010). The Ecosystem Idea and Ideal. In: Protected Land. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6813-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics