Skip to main content

Optimization Tradecraft: Hard-Won Insights from Real-World Decision Support*

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Long View of Research and Practice in Operations Research and Management Science

Abstract

Practitioners of optimization-based decision support advise commerce and government on how to coordinate the activities of millions of people who employ assets worth trillions of dollars. The contributions of these practitioners substantially improve planning methods that benefit our security and welfare. The success of real-world optimization applications depends on a few trade secrets that are essential, but that rarely, if at all, appear in textbooks. This paper summarizes a set of these secrets and uses examples to discuss each.

“Thou shalt never get such a secret from me but by a parable.” Shakespeare, The Two Gentlemen of Verona. This paper honors the memory of deceased coauthor Richard E. Rosenthal

* Reprinted by permission, Gerald G. Brown, Richard E. Rosenthal: Optimization Tradecraft: Hard-Won Insights from Real-World Decision Support, Interfaces 38(5), 356–366, 2008. Copyright 2008, the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 7240 Parkway Drive, Suite 310, Hanover, MD 21076 USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beale EML, Breare GC, Tatham PB (1974) The DOAE reinforcement and redeployment study: A case study in mathematical programming. In: Hammer PI, Zoutendijk G (eds) Mathematical programming in theory and practice. Elsevier, New York, 417–442

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bradley GH (1986) Optimization of capital portfolios. Proc. National Comm. Forum 86:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown GG (2002) Top ten secrets for successful application of optimization. Military Oper. Res. Soc. Annual Meeting, Ft. Leavenworth, KS, June 19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown GG (2004a) How to write about operations research. PHALANX 37(3):7ff

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown GG (2004b) Top ten secrets to success with optimization. PHALANX 37(4):12ff

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown GG, R. F. Dell. 2007. Formulating linear and integer linear programs: A rogues’ gallery. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 7(2, January)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown GG, Rosenthal RE (2005) Secrets of success with optimization. INFORMS Practice Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, April 18

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown GG, Washburn AR (2007) The fast theater model (FATHM). Military Oper. Res. 12(4):33–45

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown GG, Dell RF, Newman AM (2004) Optimizing military capital planning. Interfaces 34:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown GG, Dell RF, Wood RK (1997) Optimization and persistence. Interfaces 27:15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown GG, Graves GW, Honczarenko MD (1987) Design and operation of a multicommodity production distribution system using primal goal decomposition. Management Sci. 33:1469–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown GG, Graves GW, Ronen D (1987) Scheduling ocean transportation of crude oil. Management Sci. 33:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown GG, Carlyle M, Salmerón J, Wood K (2006) Defending critical infrastructure. Interfaces 36:530–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Electronic Data Systems (2006) EDS signs NMCI contract extension to 2010. Retrieved April 24, 2008, http://www.eds.com/news/news.aspx?news_id=2905

  15. Geoffrion AM (1976a) The purpose of mathematical programming is insight, not numbers. Interfaces 7(1, November):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geoffrion AM (1976b) Better distribution planning with computer models. Harvard Bus. Rev. 54(4, July–August):92–99

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geoffrion AM (1986) Capital portfolio optimization: A managerial overview. Proc. National Comm. Forum 40(1):6–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Geoffrion AM (1997) Maxims for modelers. Retrieved April 18, 2008, http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/art.geoffrion/home/docs/Gudmdlg2.htm home/docs/Gudmdlg2.htm

  19. Geoffrion AM, Powers RF (1980) Facility location analysis is just the beginning. Interfaces 10(2, April):22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Geoffrion AM, Van Roy TJ (1979) Caution: Common sense planning methods can be hazardous to your corporate health. Sloan Management Rev. 20(4, summer):31–42

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenthal RE (2007) It’s more than a job or an adventure. OR/MS Today (August):22–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper derives from decades of modeling engagements, many of which were exigent exercises assisting colleagues and past students. Successful rescue drills earned us a reputation, which led to an invited plenary tutorial at a Military Operations Research Society meeting (Brown 2002) and another at an INFORMS practice meeting (Brown and Rosenthal 2005). Along the way, we were asked to publish a “how to” guide for documenting optimization (Brown 2004a). Kirk Yost encouraged an intermediate “secrets to success” publication (Brown 2004b). In this paper, we focus on improving models that are correctly formulated. By collecting a rogues’ gallery of examples that frequently lead to confusion (Brown and Dell 2007), Rob Dell helped us hone these topics and isolate the most common mistakes leading to incorrect formulations. We are aware that the references we cite here are insular. This is not an oversight. Our advice is so opinionated, we hesitate to implicate others. We also want to present a self-consistent, unified view of our complicated topic. These references are postcards home from a life journey in optimization. We credit our close colleague, Art Geoffrion, for his many insightful observations about the conduct of decision-support engagements (Geoffrion 1976a, b; Geoffrion and Van Roy 1979; Geoffrion and Powers 1980; and Geoffrion 1986, 1997). Most of all, we are grateful to so many students who have confronted real-world problems using the optimization tools we teach, and have claimed the “lifetime money-back guarantee” that we grant each of them to come back at us and complain that “neither my textbooks nor my notes from our courses explain this.” You students were right. We fixed this with each of you and learned a lot along the way. We thank each of you. (And, every one of Distinguished Professor Rosenthal’s many such warranties, public and personal, will be honored by me, and by my colleagues. Just get in touch with us.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, G.G., Rosenthal, R.E. (2010). Optimization Tradecraft: Hard-Won Insights from Real-World Decision Support*. In: Sodhi, M., Tang, C. (eds) A Long View of Research and Practice in Operations Research and Management Science. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 148. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6810-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics