Advertisement

Introduction: Constitutional Myths

  • Alain MarcianoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Public Choice book series (SIPC, volume 23)

Abstract

Human societies function correctly, at least in part, because the individuals who belong to them share some common beliefs about their origins, foundations and, as far as social sciences and political economy is concerned, how interactions are organized. These beliefs that are also called “myths” are therefore fundamental. They perform one or several functions – namely allowing societies to exist and to be ordered – that are independent from their empirical validity. We do not mean that such beliefs are and have to be “wrong” to be efficient. But rather that their importance does not come from the fact that they would be “exact” or “true.” Certainly, when these beliefs have emerged, myths may have been related to specific events. But it does not necessarily matter, for their efficiency or for their effectiveness, whether or not myths are actually related to historical facts. Thus, foundational “myths” – these stories that explain the origins of societies – tend to become widely held and, at the same time, might be false.

Keywords

Public Choice Social Contract Direct Democracy Coercive Power European Constitution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aghion, Philippe and Jean Tirole. 1997. “Formal and Real Authority in Organizations”, Journal of Political Economy, 105 (1), pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Josselin, Jean-Michel and Alain Marciano. 2007. “How the Court Made a Federation of the EU”, Review of International Organisation, 2, pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
  3. Josselin, Jean-Michel and Alain Marciano. 2004. “Federalism and Conflicts over principalship. Some insights into the American constitutional history”, Constitutional Political Economy, 15 (3), pp. 281–304.Google Scholar
  4. Josselin, Jean-Michel and Alain Marciano. 2002. “Les relations de mandat dans les systèmes constitutionnels: Approche théorique et application au cas européen”, Revue d’Économie Politique, 112 (6), pp. 921–942.Google Scholar
  5. Josselin, Jean-Michel and Alain Marciano. 2001. Comportements stratégiques et production de droit: le cas du droit communautaire européen”, Économie Appliquée, LIV (3), pp. 211–231.Google Scholar
  6. Josselin, Jean-Michel and Alain Marciano. 2000. “Displacing your Principal. Two Historical Case Studies of Some Interest for the Constitutional Future of Europe”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 10 (3), pp. 217–223.Google Scholar
  7. Tullock, Gordon. 1965. “Constitutional Mythology”, New Individualist Review, pp. 583–587.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculté d’EconomieUniversité de Montpellier I and LAMETA-CNRSMontpellier Cedex 2France

Personalised recommendations