Skip to main content

The Hispanic Diaspora and the Public Schools: Educating Hispanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Immigrants and Minorities, Politics and Policy ((IMPP))

Abstract

Reflecting the geographic concentration of the Hispanic population in the Southwest, as recently as 1990 the bulk of Hispanic children were educated in public schools in 48 metropolitan areas. Schools in the Los Angeles and New York metropolitan areas alone educated more than one quarter of Hispanic students in the early 1990s. The Hispanic diaspora, however, has resulted in very large Hispanic public school enrollment growth in 30 “new settlement” metropolitan areas (such as Atlanta and Charlotte). The percentage of the nation’s Latino public school students that are educated in the schools of the new settlement areas has nearly doubled since 1993. The quality of public schools varies across states and metropolitan areas. On average, the public schools educating Hispanics in the 30 new settlement areas have different characteristics than the schools in the 48 traditional Hispanic metro areas. Examination of the rudimentary characteristics of the public schools educating Latinos in the new settlement areas suggests that the diaspora has not necessarily diminished the educational context of Hispanic youth. The new settlement public schools are more suburban. They tend to be smaller, are less likely to be high poverty schools (as measured by Title I status), and have smaller pupil-to-teacher ratios. At the school level, Hispanic students in the new settlement schools have more exposure to white students than their peers educated in schools in the traditional Hispanic metros. The impact of the Hispanic enrollment boom in the 30 new settlement metros was concentrated in about one-out-of-eight public schools. Compared to other public schools in the new settlement metros, the high Hispanic growth schools experienced abrupt changes since 1993. The highly impacted schools went from being majority white schools to majority minority schools by 2004. Unlike other schools, they grew substantially in size in spite of white student enrollment declines. These changes are noteworthy because although only about one-in-eight schools was affected, these schools educate 40% of Latinos in the new settlement areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Durand, Jorge, Douglas S. Massey, and Chiara Capoferro. 2005. “The New Geography of Mexican Immigration.” In New Destinations: Mexican Immigration in the United States, ed. Victor Zuniga and Ruben Hernandez-Leon, 1–20. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer, Mary J., and Marta Tienda. 2006. “Redrawing Spatial Color Lines: Hispanic Metropolitan Dispersal, Segregation, and Economic Opportunity.” In Hispanics and the Future of America, ed. Marta Tienda and Faith Mitchell, 100–137. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Durand, Jorge, Edward Telles, and Jennifer Flashman. 2006. “The Demographic Foundations of the Latino Population.” In Hispanics and the Future of America, ed. Marta Tienda and Faith Mitchell, 66–99. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wainer, Andrew. 2004. The New Latino South and the Challenge to Public Education: Strategies for Educators and Policymakers in Emerging Immigrant Communities. Los Angeles, CA: Tomás Rivera Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanushek, Eric A., and Steven G. Rivkin. 2006. “School Quality and the Black – White Achievement Gap.” NBER Working Paper No. 12651. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pong, Suet-ling, and Lingxin Hao. 2007. “Neighborhood and School Factors in the School Performance of Immigrants’ Children.” International Migration Review, 41(1): 206–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stamps, Katherine, and Stephanie A. Bohon. 2006. “Educational Attainment in New and Established Latino Metropolitan Destinations.” Social Science Quarterly, 87(5): 1225–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suro, Roberto, and Audrey Singer. 2002. Latino Growth in Metropolitan America: Changing Patterns, New Locations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wirt, John, Susan Choy, Stephen Provasnik, Patrick Rooney, Anindita Sen, and Richard Tobin. 2003. The Condition of Education 2003.” NCES 2003067. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider, Barbara, Sylvia Martinez, and Ann Owens. 2006. “Barriers to Educational Opportunities for Hispanics in the United States.” In Hispanics and the Future of America, ed. Marta Tienda and Faith Mitchell, 179–227. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rumberger, Russell W. 1995. “Dropping out of Middle School: A Multilevel Analysis of Students and Schools.” American Educational Research Journal, 32(3): 583–625.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wirt, John, Patrick Rooney, William Hussar, Susan Choy, Stephen Provasnik, Gillian Hampden-Thompson. 2005. The Condition of Education 2005.” NCES 2005094. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, Quansheng. 2006. Documentation to the NCES Common Core of Data Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey: School Year 2004–2005.” NCES 2006339. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sable, Jennifer, and Jason Hill. 2006. Overview of Public Elementary and Secondary Students, Staff, Schools, School Districts, Revenues, and Expenditures: School Year 2004–2005 and Fiscal Year 2004.” NCES 2007309. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frey, William H. 2001. Melting Pot Suburbs: A Census 2000 Study of Suburban Diversity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Logan, John 2004. Resegregation in American Public Schools? Not in the 1990s. Albany, NY: Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research, University at Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rumberger, Russell W., and Scott L. Thomas. 2000. “The Distribution of Dropout and Turnover Rates Among Urban and Suburban High Schools,” Sociology of Education, 73(1): 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Logan, John. 2002. Choosing Segregation: Racial Imbalance in American Public Schools, 1990–2000.” Albany, NY: Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research, University at Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hernandez-Leon, Ruben, and Victor Zuniga. 2005. “Applachia Meets Aztlan: Mexican Immigration and Intergroup Relations in Dalton, Georgia.” In New Destinations: Mexican Immigration in the United States, ed. Victor Zuniga and Ruben Hernandez-Leon, 244–274. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fry, Richard. 2008. “The Enrollment and Attainment of Hispanic Youth in the New Settlement Areas.” Paper presented at the 2008 Population Association of America meetings, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kocchar, Rakesh, Roberto Suro, and Sonya Tafoya. 2005. “The New Latino South: The Context and Consequences of Rapid Population Growth.” Paper presented at Immigration to New Settlement Areas, the Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gurak, Douglas T., and Mary M. Kritz. 2005. “Immigrant Settlement Patterns in the United States in the 1990s: Can Existing Theories Explain the Changes?” Paper presented at the 2005 Population Association of America meetings, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Card, David, and Ethan G. Lewis. 2007. “The Diffusion of Mexican Immigrants During the 1990s: Explanations and Impacts.” In Mexican Immigration to the United States, ed. George J. Borjas, 193–227. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The views expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Pew Hispanic Center or The Pew Charitable Trusts. The author appreciates the comments by Lindsay Lowell, Cordelia Reimers, Richard Santos, and the editors on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Fry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fry, R. (2011). The Hispanic Diaspora and the Public Schools: Educating Hispanics. In: Leal, D., Trejo, S. (eds) Latinos and the Economy. Immigrants and Minorities, Politics and Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6682-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics