How to Avoid the Next Taxpayer Bailout of the Financial System: The Narrow Banking Proposal

Chapter

Abstract

As recovery from the present economic crisis begins, policymakers must address what reforms will be made in the financial system in order to prevent the reoccurrence of a similar crisis in the future. In formulating these reforms, policymakers will also have to address the heightened moral hazard and broadened too big to fail doctrine associated with the bailouts of financial firms. These policies to deal with the impact of the crisis have resulted in large federal government deficits, a monetary base expansion with the potential for future inflation, and the depletion of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). What will Congress do in response? In terms of long-term financial reform, what is to be expected from Congress is passage of legislation that increases oversight and regulation by the federal financial regulatory agencies. Will the Federal Reserve System (Fed), or some other new or existing federal agency, be given additional regulatory and supervisory power to manage system risk? Will these reforms invite regulatory avoidance behavior by financial institutions or will financial innovation be stifled? These are the important questions that must be answered by any proposal to reform our financial system.

Keywords

Economic Crisis Assure Stake Milton Hedging 

References

  1. Bossone B (2001) Should banks be narrowed? IMF Working Paper 01/159. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2001/wp01159.pdf
  2. Bryan L (1991) Core banking. McKinsey Q 1:61–74Google Scholar
  3. Buiter W (2007) Would narrow banking prevent another Northern Rock? FT.com 22 SeptGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham JB (1991) Deposit insurance: the case for the narrow bank, in regulation. Cato Rev Bus Gov 14(2):SpringGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao J, Illing G (April 2009) Endogenous systemic liquidity risk. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2627. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1393186
  6. Economist Staff (2008) Confessions of a risk manager. The Economist, 7 AugGoogle Scholar
  7. Ely B (1991) The narrow bank: a flawed response to the failings of the federal deposit insurance, regulation. Cato Rev Bus Gov 14(2):SpringGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher I (1935) 100% money. Adelphi Company, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedland J (1994) The law and structure of the international financial system: regulation in the United States, EEC, and Japan. Quorum Books, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman M (1965) A program for monetary stability. In: Kendall LT, Ketchum MD (eds) Readings in financial institutions. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, pp 189–209Google Scholar
  11. Gola C, Roselli A (2009) The UK banking system and its regulatory and supervisory framework. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmill, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrod RF (1969) Money. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Herring RJ, Litan RE (1995) Financial regulation in the global economy. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Hetzel RL (1985) The rules versus discretion debate over monetary policy in the 1920s. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Econ Rev 71(Nov/Dec):5–9Google Scholar
  15. House of Commons Treasury Committee (2008) The run on the rock. Fifth Report of Session 2007–2008. I(Jan):13–14Google Scholar
  16. James KR (2007) The case for narrow banking. Central Bank of Brazil, 2nd Annual Seminar on Banking, Financial Stability and Risk, Sao Paulo, 7 May. http://www.bcb.gov.br/Pec/seminarios/SemMetInf2007/Port/KevinJames.pdf
  17. Jessup P, Bochnak M (1992) A case for a U.S. postal savings system. Challenge 25(Nov/Dec): 5–60Google Scholar
  18. Kobayakawa S, Nakamura H (2000) A theoretical analysis of narrow banking proposals. Monet Econ Stud 18(1):May. http://www.imes.boj.or.jp/english/publication/mes/fmes00.html
  19. Lawson N (2009) Capitalism needs a revived Glass-Steagall. Financial Times, March 16Google Scholar
  20. Litan RE (1987) What should banks do? The Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Miles W (2001) Can narrow banking provide a substitute for depository intermediaries? Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, First Annual Missouri Economics Conference, 4–5 May. http://research.stlouisfed.org/conferences/moconf/papers/miles.pdf
  22. Mishkin F (1999) Financial consolidation: dangers and opportunities. J Bank Finance 23(2–4): 675–691, FebCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Padoa-Schioppa T (2004) Regulating finance: balancing freedom and risk. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips RJ (1995a) The Chicago plan & new deal banking reform. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips RJ (1995b) Narrow banking reconsidered: the functional approach to financial reform. Levy Institute Public Policy Brief, no. 18/1995. http://www.levy.org/pubs/ppb17.pdf
  26. Pierce JL, Leone RC (1993) The future of banking. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  27. Pollock AJ (1992) Collateralized money: an idea whose time has come again. Challenge 35(Sept/Oct):62–64Google Scholar
  28. Shy O, Stenbacka RA (June 2000) Bundling argument for narrow banking. http://ozshy.50webs.com/narrow26.pdf
  29. Simons HC (1948) Economic policy for a free society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  30. Spong K (1996) Narrow banks: an alternative approach to banking reform. In: Papadimtriou DB (ed) Stability in the financial system. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY, pp 360–384Google Scholar
  31. Tobin J (1987) The case for preserving regulatory distinctions. In: Restructuring the financial system: a symposium sponsored by the federal reserve bank of Kansas City, 20–22 August:167–183. https://http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/sympos/1987/S87TOBIN.PDF
  32. Wallace N (1996) Narrow banking meets the diamond-Dybvig model. Federal Reserve Bank Minneapolis Q Rev (Winter) 20(1):3–13. http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/QR/QR2011.pdf
  33. Wilmoth AE (2002) Restructuring the American safety net after Gram-Leach-Bliley. In: Gup BE (ed) The future of banking. Quorum Books, Westport, CT, pp 101–130Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Networks Financial Institute 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Networks Financial InstituteIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.American Institute for Economic ResearchGreat BarringtonUSA
  3. 3.Faculty of FinanceCass Business SchoolLondonGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations