Abstract
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) questioned the completeness of quantum theory in their seminal work [1]. The argument is based on two spatially separated systems, which are prepared into a bipartite wavefunction and then cease to interact with each other. According to quantum mechanics, a measurement on system I will reduce system II into certain wavefunction. A different measurement setting will reduce system II into another wavefunction. These two wavefunctions could be eigenfunctions of noncommuting operators. On the one hand, localism states that the choice of measurement in system I should not change system II. On the other hand, without disturbance, the eigenfunction of an operator provides the value of the physical quantity with certain, which corresponds to an element of physical reality. So by choosing different measurement settings, two noncommuting physical quantities could have simultaneous reality, which obviously contradicts with the uncertainty relation. Therefore, EPR argued that the wave function description in quantum theory cannot be complete.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N (1935) Phys Rev 47:777
Bohm D (1951) Quantum theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Bell JS (1964) Physics 1:195
Freedman SJ, Clauser J (1972) Phys Rev Lett 28:938
Fry ES, Thompson RC (1976) Phys Rev Lett 37:465.
Aspect A, Grangier P, Roger G (1982) Phys Rev Lett 49:91
Perrie W, Duncan AJ, Beyer HJ, Kleinpoppen H (1985) Phys Rev Lett 54:1790
Shih YH, Alley CO (1988) Phys Rev Lett 61:2921
Ou ZY, Mandel L (1988) Phys Rev Lett 61:50
Rarity JG, Tapster PR (1990) Phys Rev Lett 64:2495
Hasegawa Y, Loidl R, Badurek G, Baron M, Rauch H (2003) Nature 425:45
Clauser JF, Horne MA, Shimony A, Holt RA (1969) Phys Rev Lett 23:880
Schrödinger E (1935) Naturwissenschaften 23:807
Bennett CH, Brassard G, Crepeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A, Wootters WK (1993) Phys Rev Lett 70:1895
Bennett CH, Wiesner SJ (1992) Phys Rev Lett 69:2881
Ekert AK (1991) Phys Rev Lett 67:6961
Barenco A, Deutsch D, Ekert A, Jozsa R (1995) Phys Rev Lett 74:4083
Schmidt E (1907) Math Ann 63:433
Peres A (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:1413
Horodecki M, Horodecki P, Horodecki R (1996) Phys Lett A 223:1
Simon R (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84:2726
Duan LM, Giedke G, Cirac JI, Zoller P (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84:2722
Giedke G, Kraus B, Lewenstein M, Cirac JI (2001) Phys Rev Lett 87:167904
Hillery M, Zubairy MS (2006) Phys Rev Lett 96:050503 (Hillery M, Zubairy MS (2006) Phys Rev A 74:032333)
Agarwal GS, Biswas A (2005) New J Phys 7:211
Nha H, Kim J (2006) Phys Rev A 74:012317
Nha H (2007) Phys Rev A 76:014305
Shchukin E, Vogel W (2005) Phys Rev Lett 95:230502 (2005) (Shchukin E, Vogel W (2006) Phys Rev A 74:030302(R))
Adesso G, Illuminati F (2007) J Phys A 40:7821
Li F-L, Zubairy MS (2007) In: Chen G, Kauffman L, Lomonaco SJ (eds) Mathematics of quantum computation and quantum technology, pp 349–385
Werner RF (1989) Phys Rev A 40:4277
Horodecki R, Horodecki P, Horodecki M (1996) Phys Lett A 210:377
Horodecki P (1997) Phys Lett A232:333
Horodecki M, Horodecki P, Horodecki R (1998) Phys Rev Lett 80:5239
Simon R, Sudarshan ECG, Mukunda N (1987) Phys Rev A 6:3868
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sun, Q., Zubairy, M.S. (2012). Entanglement Criteria for Continuous-Variable Systems. In: Cohen, L., Poor, H., Scully, M. (eds) Classical, Semi-classical and Quantum Noise. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6624-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6624-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6623-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6624-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)