Advertisement

Body Channel Communication for Energy-Efficient BAN

  • Seong-Jun SongEmail author
  • Hoi-Jun Yoo
Chapter
Part of the Integrated Circuits and Systems book series (ICIR)

Abstract

Recent advances in semiconductor technologies and computing systems have led to the proliferation of mobile and portable electronic devices opening the ubiquitous mobile computing environment. A wearable computing technology is an example for the user to facilely place such devices around the human body. The wearable electronic devices (e.g., wrist-type computers, earphones, video eyeglasses, and head-mounted displays) and sensors offer potentials for wide range of applications from the health management to ambient intelligence [1–2]. Since such devices are distributed on the human body, a body area network (BAN) can provide the connectivity between each wearable device with the communication range of the human body, corresponding to 1–2 m. Moreover, it should get powered by a very small battery in order to minimize its physical size and get connected through simple interfaces for the convenience of the use. Since the wearer utilizes wearable electronic devices and sensors continuously anytime and anywhere, the devices require a low power data transceiver employing energy-efficient communication schemes and also the high data rate operation needs for exchanging multimedia data such as audio or video over BANs.

Keywords

Body Area Network Schmitt Trigger Pseudo Random Binary Sequence Human Body Communication Minimum Supply Voltage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim S, Lee J-Y, Song S-J, Cho N, Yoo H-J (2006) An Energy-efficient analog front-end circuit for a sub-1-V digital hearing chip. IEEE J Solid State Circuits 41:876–882, Apr 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashok RL, Agrawal DP (2003) Next-generation wearable networks. IEEE Computer Mag 31–39, Nov 2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verma S, Xu J, Hamada M, Lee TH (2005) A 17-mW 0.66-mm2 Direct-conversion receiver for 1-Mb/s cable replacement. IEEE J Solid State Circuits 40:2547–2554, Dec 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ryckaert J, Badaroglu M, Heyn VD, Plas DGV, Nuzzo P, Baschirotto A, S. D’Amico, Desset C, Suys H, Libois M, Poucke BV, Wambacq P, Gyselinckx B (2006) A 16 mA UWB 3-to-5 GHz 20 Mpulses/s Quadrature analog correlation receiver in 0.18 μm CMOS.ISSCC Dig Tech Papers, 114–115, Feb 2006Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zimmerman TG (1995) Personal area networks (PAN): near-field intra-body communication. M.S. Thesis, MIT, Sept 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hachisuka K, Nakata A, Takeda T, Terauchi Y, Shiba K, Sasaki K, Hosaka H, Itao K (2003) Development and performance analysis of an intra-body communication device. transducers ’03, 1722–1725, June 2003Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shinagawa M, Fukumoto M, Ochiai K, Kyuragi H (2004) A near-field-sensing transceiver for intrabody communication based on the electrooptic effect. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 53:1533–1538, Dec 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruiz JA, Xu J, Shimamoto S (2006) Propagation characteristics of intra-body communications for body area networks. IEEE Consumer Commun Network Conf Jan. 2006, pp 509–513Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ward LC, Byrne NM, Rutter K, Hennoste L, Hills AP, Cornish BH, Thomas BJ (1997) Reliability of multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis: an intermachine comparison. Amer J Hum Biol 9:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 74:494–522Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IEEE Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 Hz to 300 GHz, IEEE C95.1-1991, (1999 ed.).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neuteboom H, Kup JBM, Janssens M (1997) A DSP-based hearing instrument IC. IEEE J Solid State Circuits 32:1790–1806, Nov 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luo L, Wilson JM, Mick SE, Xu J, Zhang L, Franzon PD (2006) 3 Gb/s AC coupled chip-to-chip communication using a low swing pulse receiver. J Solid State Circuits 41:287–296, Jan 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song S-J, Park SM, Yoo H-J (2003) A 4-Gb/s CMOS clock and data recovery circuit using 1/8-rate clock technique. IEEE J Solid State Circuits 38:1213–1219, July 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anand SB, Razavi B A 2.75 Gb/s CMOS clock recovery circuit with broad capture range. IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf. Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb 2001 pp 214–215Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Billinghurst M, Starner T (1999) Wearable devices: new ways to manage information. IEEE Computer 32:57–64, Jan 1999Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Song S-J, Cho N, Kim S, Yoo J, Yoo H-J (2006) A 2 Mb/s wideband pulse transceiver with direct-coupled interface for human body communications. IEEE ISSCC Dig Tech Papers, 558–559, Feb. 2006Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cojocaru C (2005) Low power bluetooth for headset applications.IDEAS’05, 223–226, July 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Samsung Electronics Co., LTDSuwonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations