A Challenging E-journey Along the Silk Road: Lessons Learned from E-governments in China and India

Chapter
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 25)

Abstract

Recent experiments from around the world have offered testimony to the relevance of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in disseminating and simplifying the delivery of government-to-citizen services. Even in developing countries, successful e-government service delivery can, achieve three vital objectives—transparency, accessibility, and development. China and India are the first and second most populous nations in the world, respectively, accounting for over 37% of the world’s total population. Both countries are characterized by urban–rural disparities, income gaps, and inequalities in access of essential services. Toward the goal of bridging these divides in access to the government or its services, ICT opportunities for development are being explored by extensively implementing e-government networks within urban and rural regions. However, both successes and failures are prevalent within their current e-government infrastructures. This chapter probes the question of what determines a project’s success, using Heeks’ “Design-Reality Gap” model and infoDev’s criteria for successful e-government projects. An analysis is attempted of two e-government projects each in China and India. The authors’ analyses are solely based on secondary sources from practitioners, scholars, and governments that were involved with the projects in China or India. This chapter aims to emphasize the necessary role of underlying factors relevant to Indian and Chinese e-governments, such as education, funding, connectivity, leadership, and governmental control. In the absence of these factors, it is expected that success might be elusive.

Keywords

Income Expense Argentina 

References

  1. APDIP (2006). Fighting Corruption with e-Government Applications. APDIP e-Note.Google Scholar
  2. Bhatia, D., Bhatnagar, S. C., & Tominaga, J. (2009). How do manual and e-government services compare? Experiences from India. In Information and communications for development 2009: Extending reach and increasing impact (pp. 67–82). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Bhatnagar, S. (2003). Access to information report: E-government. London: Profile Books Limited.Google Scholar
  4. Bhatnagar, S. (2004). E-government: From vision to implementation. India: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bhatnagar, S., & Vyas, N. (2001). Gyandoot: Community owned rural intranet kiosks. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  6. Carmine, S., & Yuhang, S. (1999). World wide web site design and use in public management. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Information technology and computer applications in public administration: Issues and trends (pp. 246–266). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Carrow, J. (2001). Five keys to e-government. Interactive Week, 8(2), 86.Google Scholar
  8. Cecchini, S. (2002, July 10). Evaluation of Gyandoot and Bhoomi (India). (H. Arazyan, Interviewer) Development Gateway.Google Scholar
  9. Cecchini, S., & Raina, M. (2004). Electronic government and the rural poor: The case of Gyandoot. Information Technologies and International Development, 65–75.Google Scholar
  10. Center for Democracy and Technology. (2002). The e-government development handbook for developing countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Chawla, R. (2004). BHOOMI: Online delivery of record of rights, tenancy and crops to farmers in Karnataka, India. New Delhi: National Institute for Smart Government.Google Scholar
  12. Chawla, R., & Bhatnagar, S. (2004). Online delivery of land titles to rural farmers in Karnataka, India. In Reducing poverty, sustaining growth—what works, what doesn’t, and why a global exchange for scaling up success. Washington, DC : World Bank.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, A. J., Pan, S. L., Zhang, J., Huang, W. W., & Zhu, S. (2009). Managing e-government implementation in China: A process perspective. Information & Management, 46, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciborra, C. (2005). Interpreting e-government and development: Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? Information Technology & People, 18(3), 260–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciborra, C., & Navarro, D. D. (2005). Good governance, development theory, and aid policy: Risks and challenges of e-government in Jordan. Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dada, D. (2006). The failure of e-government in developing countries: A literature review. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 26(7), 1–10.Google Scholar
  17. De, R. (2005). E-government systems in developing countries: Stakeholders and conflict. In M. A. Wimmer., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Electronic Government, 4th International Conference (pp. 26–37). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. De, R. (2006). The impact of Indian e-government initiatives: Issues of poverty and vulnerability reduction, and conflict. Regional Development Dialogue. UNCRD and UNDP.Google Scholar
  19. De, R. (2006, December 14). Design and evaluation of the societal impact of GII: The case of bhoomi in Karnataka, India. Bangalore, Karnataka, India: Indian Institute of Management Bangalore.Google Scholar
  20. Gadiyar, C. (2007, December 10). Bhoomi empowers rural Karnataka. Retrieved August 17, 2009, from Dataquest: http://dqindia.ciol.com/content/top_stories/2007/107121001.asp
  21. Hanlon, C. (2004, May 20). On the road to Shanghai: India; closing the digital divide to cut corruption and poverty. Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20204636~menuPK:34459~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html
  22. Heeks, R. (Ed.). (1999). Reinventing government in the information age: International practice in IT-enabled public sector reform. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced? Manchester: IDPM.Google Scholar
  24. Ho, A. T.-K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. infoDev. (2002). The e-government handbook for developing countries. Washington, DC: infoDev and Center for Democracy and Technology.Google Scholar
  26. Jafri, A., Dongre, A., Tripathi, V. N., Aggrawal, A., & Shrivastava, S. (2002). Information communication technologies and governance: The Gyandoot experiment in Dhar district of Madhya Pradesh, India. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Kelles-Viitanen, A. (2003). The role of ICT in poverty reduction. The Finnish Economy and Society, 82–94.Google Scholar
  28. Lan, L. (2004). E-government: A catalyst to good governance in China. In Knowledge management in electronic government (pp. 317–324). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Lovelock, P., & Ure, J. (2002). Assessing China’s efforts in constructing an e-government. In M. Woesler & J. Zhang (Eds.), China digital dream: The impact of the internet on Chinese society (pp. 177–200). Bochum: The University Press Bochum.Google Scholar
  30. Luo, G. (2009). E-government, people and social change: A case study in China. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
  31. Mansell, R., & Wehn, U. (1998). Knowledge societies: Information technology for sustainable development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  33. PCIP. (2002). Roadmap for e-government in the developing world: 10 questions e-government leaders should ask themselves. Los Angeles: PCIP.Google Scholar
  34. Scavo, C., & Shi, Y. (1999). World Wide Web site design and use in public management. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Information technology and computer applications in public administration:Issues and trends. Hershey: IDEA.Google Scholar
  35. Seneviratne, S. J. (1999). Information technology and organizational change in the public sector. In Information technology and computer applications in public administration: issues and trends (pp. 41–61). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Spence, R. (2003). Information and communications technologies (ICTs) for poverty reduction: when, where and how? Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  37. Tan, X. (2002). Development of e-government in China—present status, challenges, and problems. In M. Woesler & J. Zhang (Eds.), China digital dream: The impact of the internet on Chinese society (pp. 177–200). Bochum: The University Press Bochum.Google Scholar
  38. Vrasidas, C., Zembylas, M., & Glass, G. V. (2009). ICT for development: Challenges and possibilities. In C. Vrasidas, M. Zembylas, & C. V. Glass (Eds.), ICT for education, development and social justice (pp. 3–17). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  39. World, T. W.-G. (2002). Roadmap for e-government in the developing world. Pacific Council on International Policy.Google Scholar
  40. World Bank. (2009). Definition of e-government. http://go.worldbank.org/M1JHE0Z280
  41. Xu, D., & Astone, M. (2005). E-government in China. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/ APCITY/UNPAN022802.pdf
  42. Yan, Z. (2006). Municipal e-government in China: The case of Beijing. Beijing: BMOI.Google Scholar
  43. Zhou, X. (2004). E-government in China: A content analysis of national and provincial web sites.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations