Advertisement

The Politics of E-government in Spain: Between Recent Innovations and Old Inertias

  • J. Ignacio Criado
Chapter
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 25)

Abstract

This chapter describes the case of adoption and evolution of Electronic Government (e-government) in Spain during the democratic period, showing how an adolescent public administration has shaped (and been shaped by) the diffusion of the latest generation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). This study describes the initial stages of the adoption of computing in Spanish government from the beginning of democracy in 1978, also draws upon the attributes of the Spanish process of e-government adoption, and additionally emphasizes the significance of citizens’ perceptions, use of, and barriers to e-government to understand its adoption. In consequence, this chapter supports the idea of prioritizing institutional variables to understand e-government, together with the need to discern the role of social demand or of external users on it. Besides, the results of this study support the conclusion that Spain has placed more importance on, for example, institutional and social aspects, rather than technological issues, in its implementation of e-government. In sum, Internet and web-based technologies and services have been of growing importance in national (central) Spanish government, opening a window of opportunity for administrative innovation. At the same time, old inertias, in bureaucratic terms, shape both the design and results of e-government utilization in this case.

Keywords

European Union Public Administration Public Sector Organization Royal Decree Spanish Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arrowsmith, J., Sisson K., & Marginson, P. (2004). What can “Benchmarking” offer the open method of co-ordination? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alabau, A. (2004). The European Union and its e-Government policy. Madrid: Vodafone Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Alabau, A. (2001). The European Union and its information society policy. Madrid: Vodafone Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Bannister, F. (2007). The curse of the benchmark: An assessment of the validity and value of e-Government comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Evelien, K. (2006). Governance, ICT and the innovation Agenda of public administration: A comparison of some European policy initiatives. In V. J. J. M. Bekkers, H. van Duivenboden, & M. Thaens (Eds.), Information and communication technology and public innovation. (pp. 22–50), Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  6. Borrás, S., & Jacobsson, K. (2004). The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Criado, J. I. (2009a). Between utopian dreams and pessimistic visions. Internet and ICTs in the modernization of public administration (Entre Sueños Utópicos y Visiones Pesimistas. Internet y las TIC en la Modernización de las Administraciones Públicas), Madrid: National Institute of Public Administration (Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública).Google Scholar
  8. Criado, J. I. (2009b). Building the digital government in regions. Success factors and institutional barriers in Spanish Comunidades Autónomas. In J. R. Córdoba & A. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Systems thinking and e-Participation: ICT in the governance of society. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  9. Criado, J. I. (2009c). Europeanization of e-Government policy. Institutional mechanisms and implications for public policy innovation. Information Polity, 14(4), 315–330.Google Scholar
  10. Criado, J. I., & Carmen Ramilo, M. (2007). Local public administration in the age of the web. The case of Spain. In D. Griffin, P. Trevorrow, & E. Halpin (Eds.), Developments in e-Government. A critical analysis (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  11. Criado, J. I., Hughes, O. E., & Teicher, J. (2003). E-Government in Australia and Spain: A study of contrasts and similarities, paper presented at VI International Research Symposium on Public Management, 8–10th April, Edinburgh, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Dunleavy, P., & Hellen, M. (2007). Government on the internet. Progress in delivering information and services online. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
  13. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state and e-Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2006). E-Government Action Plan. 2010 Accelerating eGovernment in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  15. European Council. (2000). Conclusions of the presidency for the Lisbon European Council. Lisbon: European Council.Google Scholar
  16. Gallego, R. (2003). Public management policymaking in Spain, 1982–1996. Policy entrepreneurship and (In) opportunity windows. International Public Management Journal, 6(3), 283–307.Google Scholar
  17. Gil-García, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-Government. The Influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gómez, E. (2005). The electronic signature in Spain. e-Signature Law Journal (now the Digital Evidence Journal), 2(2), 115–116.Google Scholar
  19. Heeks, R. (2005). E-Government as a carrier of context. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MAP. (2006). Information technologies in central public administration. REINA-05 Report (Las Tecnologías de la Información en la Administración del Estado. Informe REINA-05). Madrid: Ministry for Public Administration – Official State Gazette (Ministerio de Administraciones Públicas – Boletín Oficial del Estado).Google Scholar
  21. MAP. (1991). Sessions for the modernization of public administration (Jornadas para la Modernización de las Administraciones Públicas). Madrid: Ministry for Public Administration (Ministerio para las Administraciones Públicas).Google Scholar
  22. MAP. (1990). Reflections for the Modernization of Central Public Administration (Reflexiones para la Modernización de la Administración del Estado). Madrid: Ministry for Public Administration (Ministerio para las Administraciones Públicas).Google Scholar
  23. MCyT. (2001). Action Plan INFO XXI. An Information Society for All (Plan de Acción INFO XXI. Una Sociedad de la Información para Todos). Madrid: Ministry of Science and Technology (Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología).Google Scholar
  24. Martín, T. (2001). Projects for e-Government in Spain (Proyectos para una Administración Electrónica en España) Reforma y Democracia, 20, 1–17.Google Scholar
  25. Martín-Acebes, Á. (1993). New information technologies and its use in public administration (Las Nuevas Tecnologías de la Información y su Uso en la Administración). In Ministry for Public Administration (Ministerio de Administraciones Públicas) (Ed.), Administrative modernization and training. international seminar INAP (Modernización Administrativa y Formación. Seminario Internacional INAP). (pp. 89–122). Madrid: Ministry for Public Administration (Ministerio para las Administraciones Públicas).Google Scholar
  26. Martínez, R. (1984). The process of computerization in Spanish public administration (El Proceso de Informatización de la Administración Pública Española) Documentación Administrativa, 200, 133–162.Google Scholar
  27. Mason, S. (2007). Electronic Signatures in Law (2nd edn.) Haywards Heath: Tottel.Google Scholar
  28. Muñoz, A. (2003). Central public administration in the internet (La Administración General del Estado en Internet. Un Estudio sobre la VI Legislatura). Badajoz: Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar
  29. Muñoz, A., & Chain, C. (2004). The world wide web as an information system in Spain’s regional administration. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 199–218.Google Scholar
  30. Parrado, S. (2008). Failed policies but institutional innovation through “Layering” and “Diffusion” in Spanish central administration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 230–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramió, C., & Salvador, M. (2002). The conformation of public administration in the autonomous communities (La Configuración de las Administraciones de las Comunidades Autónomas). In J. Subirats & R. Gallego (Eds.), Twenty years of autonomies in Spain (Veinte Años de Autonomías en España) (pp. 99–133). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar
  32. Reddick, C. G. (2006). Information resource managers and e-Government effectiveness. A survey of Texas state agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reddick, C. G. (2004). A two stages model of e-Government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sancho, D. (2005). The development of Spanish electronic administration. In G. Petroni & F. Cloete (Eds.), New technologies in public administration (pp. 60–74), Amsterdam: IOS Press-International Institute of Administrative Science.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations. (2008). E-Government survey 2008. Washington, DC: Division for Public Administration and Development Management.Google Scholar
  36. United Nations. (2005). Global e-Government readiness report 2005. Washington, DC: Division for Public Administration and Development Management.Google Scholar
  37. United Nations. (2004). Global e-Readiness report 2004. Washington, DC: Division for Public Administration and Development Management.Google Scholar
  38. United Nations. (2003). World public sector report 2003: E-government at the crossroads. Washington, DC: Division for Public Administration and Development Management.Google Scholar
  39. Valero, J. (2007a). Electronic access to services and diffusion of citizens’ information by electronic means (Acceso a los Servicios y Difusión de la Información por Medios Electrónicos). In E. Gamero & J. Valero (Eds.), E-Government law (La Ley de Administración electrónica) Madrid: Aranzadi.Google Scholar
  40. Valero, J. (2007b). E-Government regulation (El Régimen Jurídico de la e-Administración) (2nd edn.) Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
  41. Yildiz, M. (2007). E-Government research. Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International RelationsUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations