Skip to main content

Position, Displacement, and Level

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 8941 Accesses

Abstract

The measurement of position and displacement of physical objects is essential for many applications: process feedback control, performance evaluation, transportation traffic control, robotics, security systems, just to name the few. By position, we mean determination of the object’s coordinates (linear or angular) with respect to a selected reference. Displacement means moving from one position to another for a specific distance or angle. In other words, displacement is measured when an object is referenced to its own prior position rather than to an external reference.

A critical distance is measured by proximity sensors. In effect, a proximity sensor is a threshold version of a position detector. A position sensor is often a linear device whose output signal represents a distance to the object from a certain reference point. A proximity sensor, however, is a somewhat simpler device, which generates the output signal when a certain distance to the object becomes essential for an indication. For instance, many moving mechanisms in process control and robotics use a very simple but highly reliable proximity sensor, the end switch. It is an electrical switch having normally open or normally closed contacts. When a moving object activates the switch by a physical contact, the latter sends a signal to a control circuit. The signal is an indication that the object has reached the end position where the switch is positioned. Obviously, such contact switches have many drawbacks, for example, a high mechanical load on a moving object and a hysteresis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nevertheless, the maximum rate of response is often specified by a manufacturer.

  2. 2.

    See Sect. 3.8 for the operating principle.

  3. 3.

    For more information on permanent magnets see Sect. 3.3.4.

  4. 4.

    Information on the KZM10 and KM110 sensors is courtesy of Philips Semiconductors BV. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

  5. 5.

    Internally, ferromagnetic materials have a structure that is represented by domains, each of which is a region of uniform magnetic polarization. When a magnetic field is applied, the boundaries between the domains shift and the domains rotate, both these effects causing a change in the material’s dimensions.

  6. 6.

    Photoetching or photochemical milling parts may be fabricated of a variety materials, including Elgiloy, Nitinol, Titanium, and Kapton® (polyimide film). However, the encoding disks having thickness of 0.005″ typically are etched from stainless steel or beryllium copper alloy.

  7. 7.

    See Sect. 6.2 for the description of the Doppler effect for microwaves. The effect is fully applicable to propagation of any energy having wave nature, including ultrasonic.

  8. 8.

    See Sect. 3.10 for description of sound waves.

References

  1. Barker MJ, Colclough MS (1997) A two-dimensional capacitive position transducer with rotation output. Rev Sci Instrum 68(8):3238–3240

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters RD U.S. Patent No. 5,461,319 Symmetric differential capacitive pressure transducer employing cross coupled conductive plates to form equipotential pairs.

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Silva CW (1989) Control sensors and actuators, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  4. Linear application handbook (1990) Linear Technology, AN3–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. CN-207 Hall Effect IC Applications, Sprague (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halg B (1992) A silicon pressure sensor with a low-cost contactless interferometric optical readout, Sens Actuators A 30:225–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dakin JP, Wade CA, Withers PB (1987) An optical fiber pressure sensor, SPIE fiber optics ’87: fifth international conference on fiber optics and opto-electronics, vol 734, pp 194–201

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee CE and Taylor HF (1991) Fiber-optic Fabry-Perot temperature sensor using a low-coherence light source, J Lightwave Technol 9:129–134

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolthuis RA, Mitchell GL, Saaski E, Hartl JC, Afromowitz MA (1991) Development of medical pressure and temperature sensors employing optical spectrum modulation, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38:974–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spillman WB Jr (1981) Multimode fiber-optic hydrophone based on a schlieren technique. Appl Opt 20:465

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Drecht J, Meijer GCM (1991) Concepts for the design of smart sensors and smart signal processors and their applications to PSD displacement transducers. In: Transducers’91. International conference on solid-state sensors and actuators. Digest of technical papers, ©IEEE, pp 475–478

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noffz GK, Bowman MP (1996) Design and Laboratory Validation of a Capacitive Sensor for Measuring the Recession of a Thin-Layered Ablator. NASA Technical Memorandum 4777

    Google Scholar 

  13. In-Depth Ablative Plug Transducers, (1992) Series #S-2835, Hycal Engineering, 9650 Telstar Avenue, P.O. Box 5488, El Monte, CA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brown RC, Andreussi P, Zanelli S (1978) The use of wire probes for the measurement of liquid film thickness in annular gas-liquid flows, Can J Chem Eng 56:754–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham J, Kryzeminski M, Popovic Z (2000) Capacitance based scanner for thickness mapping of thin dielectric films. Rev Sci Intrum 71(5):2219–2223

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brusch L, Delfitto G, Mistura G (1999) Level meter for dielectric liquids. Rev Sci Instrum 70(2)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steven Kirsch ST (1985) Detector for electro-optical mouse. U.S. Patent No. 4,546,347, 8 Oct

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olson LT (1988) Inertial mouse system. U.S. Patent No. 4,787,051, 22 Nov

    Google Scholar 

  19. Solhjell E (1996) Mouse and trackball design with contact-less roller sensor. U.S. Patent No. 5583541, 10 Dec

    Google Scholar 

  20. Azevedo SG, Gavel DT, Mast JE, Warhus JP (1995) Landmine detection and imaging using micropower impulse radar (MIR). Proceedings of the workshop on anti-personnel mine detection and removal, 1 July 1995, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp 48–51

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dowla FU, Nikoogar F (2007) Multi-pulse multi-delay (MPMD) multiple access modulator for UWB. U.S. Patent No. 7,194,019, 20 Mar

    Google Scholar 

  22. Young D et al. (1996) A micromachined variable capacitor for monolithic low-noise VCOs. Solid-state sensor and actuator workshop. Hilton Head, SC

    Google Scholar 

  23. McEwan TE (1994) Ultra-wideband radar motion sensor. U.S. Patent No. 5,361,070, 1 Nov

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Fraden .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fraden, J. (2010). Position, Displacement, and Level. In: Handbook of Modern Sensors. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6466-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics