Advertisement

The Role of Precursor Frequency in the Differentiation of Memory T Cells: Memory by Numbers

  • Amanda L. Marzo
  • Ryan T. Sowell
  • Bernadette Scott
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 684)

Abstract

Immunological memory is considered the hallmark of adaptive, or acquired, immunity. That ability of our immune system to recognize and respond to those pathogens we have encountered before not only typifies acquired immunity but has provided the basis for the most notable of medical interventions: vaccination. Yet, as much as we now know about this process, we are still on the cusp of fully understanding how memory T cells develop, how they are maintained and the importance of memory T-cell heterogeneity. In this review we will primarily focus on our understanding of CD8 T-cell memory generated during acute infections and how precursor frequency influences their development and functional attributes.

Keywords

Asymmetric Cell Division Immunological Memory Precursor Frequency Naive Recipient High Precursor Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jenner E. An inquiry into the causes and effects of the variolae vaccinae; 1798. In: The challenges of Epidemiology: Issues and selected readings. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization, 1988:31–32.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pasteur L. The germ theory and its applications to medicine and surgery. In: The Harvard Classics: Scientific Papers. BiblioBazaar, 1910:1909–14.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thucydides HD. Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War, Book II. London: George Bell and Sons, 1902.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jerne NK. The natural-selection theory of antibody formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1955; 41:849–857.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burnett FM. A modification of Jerne’s theory of antibody production using the concept of clonal selection. Australian Journal of Science 2008; 20:67–69.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller JF. Immunological function of the thymus. Lancet 1961; 2:748–749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller JFAP. The thymus and the development of immunological responsiveness. Science 1964; 144:1544–1547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmed R, Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation. Science 1996; 272:54–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmed R, Butler LD, Bhatti L. T4+ T helper cell function in vivo: differential requirement for induction of antiviral cytotoxic T-cell and antibody responses. J Virol 1988; 62:2102–2106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flynn KJ, Riberdy JM, Christensen JP et al. In vivo proliferation of naive and memory influenza-specific CD8(+) T-cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:8597–8602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sprent J, Surh CD. Generation and maintenance of memory T-cells. Curr Opin Immunol 2001; 13:248–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zinkernagel RM, Bachmann MF, Kundig TM et al. On immunological memory. Annu Rev Immunol 1996; 14:333–367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akbar AN, Terry L, Timms A et al. Loss of CD45R and gain of UCHL1 reactivity is a feature of primed T-cells. J Immunol 1988; 140:2171–2178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merkenschlager M, Beverley PC. Evidence for differential expression of CD45 isoforms by precursors for memory-dependent and independent cytotoxic responses: human CD8 memory CTLp selectively express CD45RO (UCHL1). Int Immunol 1989; 1:450–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamann D, Baars PA, Rep MH et al. Phenotypic and functional separation of memory and effector human CD8+ T-cells. J Exp Med 1997; 186:1407–1418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R et al. Two subsets of memory T-lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 1999; 401:708–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Warnock RA, Askari S, Butcher EC et al. Molecular mechanisms of lymphocyte homing to peripheral lymph nodes. J Exp Med 1998; 187:205–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Masopust D, Vezys V, Marzo AL et al. Preferential localization of effector memory cells in nonlymphoid tissue. Science 2001; 291:2413–2417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baars PA, Sierro S, Arens R et al. Properties of murine (CD8+) CD27-T-cells. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35:3131–3141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hintzen RQ, de Jong R, Lens SM et al. CD27: marker and mediator of T-cell activation? Immunol Today 1994; 15:307–311.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaech SM, Tan JT, Wherry EJ et al. Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T-cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells. Nat Immunol 2003; 4:1191–1198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oehen S, Waldner H, Kundig TM et al. Antivirally protective cytotoxic T-cell memory to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus is governed by persisting antigen. J Exp Med 1992; 176:1273–1281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gray D, Matzinger P. T-cell memory is short-lived in the absence of antigen. J Exp Med 1991; 174:969–974.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lau LL, Jamieson BD, Somasundaram T et al. Cytotoxic T-cell memory without antigen. Nature 1994; 369:648–652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hou S, Hyland L, Ryan KW et al. Virus specific CD8+ T-cell memory determined by clonal burst size. Nature 1994; 369:652–654.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wherry EJ, Barber DL, Kaech SM et al. Antigen-independent memory CD8 T-cells do not develop during chronic viral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:16004–16009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bixby LM, Tarleton RL. Stable CD8+ T-cell memory during persistent Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J Immunol 2008; 181:2644–2650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vezys V, Masopust D, Kemball CC et al. Continuous recruitment of naive T-cells contributes to heterogeneity of antiviral CD8 T-cells during persistent infection. J Exp Med 2006; 203:2263–2269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scott B, Bluthmann H, Teh HS et al. The generation of mature T-cells requires interaction of the alpha beta T-cell receptor with major histocompatibility antigens. Nature 1989; 338:591–593.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaye J, Hsu ML, Sauron ME et al. Selective development of CD4+ T-cells in transgenic mice expressing a class II MHC-restricted antigen receptor. Nature 1989; 341:746–749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pircher H, Burki K, Lang R et al. Tolerance induction in double specific T-cell receptor transgenic mice varies with antigen. Nature 1989; 342:559–561.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scott B, Liblau R, Degermann S et al. A role for nonMHC genetic polymorphism in susceptibility to spontaneous autoimmunity. Immunity 1994; 1:73–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kearney ER, Pape KA, Loh DY et al. Visualization of peptide-specific T-cell immunity and peripheral tolerance induction in vivo. Immunity 1994; 1:327–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marzo AL, Lake RA, Lo D et al. Tumor antigens are constitutively presented in the draining lymph nodes. J Immunol 1999; 162:5838–5845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kurts C, Heath WR, Carbone FR et al. Constitutive class I-restricted exogenous presentation of self antigens in vivo. J Exp Med 1996; 184:931–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wherry EJ, Teichgraber V, Becker TC et al. Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T-cell subsets. Nat Immunol 2003; 4:225–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marzo AL, Klonowski KD, Le Bon A et al. Initial T-cell frequency dictates memory CD8+ T-cell lineage commitment. Nat Immunol 2005; 6:793–799.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Baron V, Bouneaud C, Cumano A et al. The repertoires of circulating human CD8(+) central and effector memory T-cell subsets are largely distinct. Immunity 2003; 18:193–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Badovinac VP, Haring JS, Harty JT. Initial T-cell receptor transgenic cell precursor frequency dictates critical aspects of the CD8(+) T-cell response to infection. Immunity 2007; 26:827–841.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moon JJ, Chu HH, Pepper M et al. Naive CD4(+) T-cell frequency varies for different epitopes and predicts repertoire diversity and response magnitude. Immunity 2007; 27:203–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Obar JJ, Khanna KM, Lefrancois L. Endogenous naive CD8+ T-cell precursor frequency regulates primary and memory responses to infection. Immunity 2008; 28:859–869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stemberger C, Huster KM, Koffler M et al. A single naive CD8+ T-cell precursor can develop into diverse effector and memory subsets. Immunity 2007; 27:985–997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Horvitz HR, Herskowitz I. Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: two Bs or not two Bs, that is the question. Cell 1992; 68:237–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chang JT, Palanivel VR, Kinjyo I et al. Asymmetric T-lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science 2007; 315:1687–1691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roberts AD, Woodland DL. Effector memory CD8+ T-cells play a prominent role in recall responses to secondary viral infection in the lung. J Immunol 2004; 172:6533–6537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Roberts AD, Ely KH, Woodland DL. Differential contributions of central and effector memory T-cells to recall responses. J Exp Med 2005; 202:123–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda L. Marzo
    • 1
  • Ryan T. Sowell
    • 1
  • Bernadette Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Immunology and MicrobiologyRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations