Abstract
The recent global increases in agricultural commodity prices can be attributed to a number of factors, but one of the most important was the large increase in US ethanol production. We argue that without a complex web of ethanol policies, little ethanol would be produced in the United States. This is likely the case for biofuel production in the EU, Canada, and other developed countries as well. It is increasingly evident that developing countries have a comparative advantage in the production of biofuels and their feedstock. Yet policies have been enacted that discriminate against trade. The result is little international trade in biofuels. This chapter puts into perspective the effects of US ethanol policies on commodity prices, as well as their impact on US terms of trade.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, Philip C., Hurt, C., Tyner, W.E. (2008), What’s Driving Food Prices?, Issue Report, Farm Foundation, Washington, DC. http://farmfoundation.org/webcontent/Farm-Foundation-Issue-Report-Whats-Driving-Food-Prices-404.aspx?a=404&z=89&.
Anderson, K., Martin, W., Valenzuela, E. (2006a), The relative importance of global agricultural subsidies and market access, World Trade Review 5(3): 357–376.
Anderson, K., Martin, W., van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2006b), Distortions to world trade: Impacts on agricultural markets and incomes, Review of Agricultural Economics 28(2): 168–194.
Collins, K.J. (2008), The Role of Biofuels and Other Factors in Increasing Farm and Food Prices: A Review of Recent Development with a Focus on Feed Grain Markets and Market Prospects. Prepared for Kraft Foods Global, Inc., Glenview Illinois.
de Gorter, H., Just, D.R. (2007a), The Law of Unintended Consequences: How the U.S. Biofuel Tax Credit with a Mandate Subsidizes Oil Consumption and Has No Impact on Ethanol Consumption, Department of Applied Economics and Management Working Paper # 2007-20, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 23 October. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1024525. Accessed on 9 May 2010.
de Gorter, H., Just, D.R. (2007b), The Economics of U.S. Ethanol Import Tariffs With a Consumption Mandate and Tax Credit, Department of Applied Economics and Management Working Paper # 2007-21, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 23 October. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1024532. Accessed on 9 May 2010.
de Gorter, H., Just, D.R. (2008), ‘Water’ in the U.S. ethanol tax credit and mandate: Implications for rectangular deadweight costs and the corn-oil price relationship, Review of Agricultural Economics 30(3), Fall: 397–410.
de Gorter, H., Just, D.R., Kliauga, E.M. (2008), Measuring the “Subsidy” Component of Biofuel Tax Credits and Exemptions, Paper Presented to the IATRC Annual Meetings, Scottsdale, AZ, 7–9 December.
Du, X., Hayes, D.J. (2008), The Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and on the Profitability of the U.S. Oil Refinery Industry. Working Paper 08-WP 467 Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University, Ames, IA, April 8.
Eidman, V.R., Hauser, R.J. (2007), Ethanol economics of dry mill plants, Chapter 3, In: Corn-Based Ethanol in Illinois and the U.S.: A Report, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, 22–36 University of Illinois, Champaign, IL.
Elobeid, A., Tokgoz, S. (2008), Removing distortions in the U.S. ethanol market: What does it imply for the United States and Brazil? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(4): 918–932.
FAPRI, US Baseline Briefing Book. (2008), http://www.fapri.missouri.edu/outreach/publications/2008/FAPRI_MU_Report_03_08.pdf. Accessed on 9 May 2010.
Farrell, A.E., Plevin, R.J., Turner, B.T., Jones, A.D., O’Hare, M., Kammen, D.M. (2006), Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals, Science 311: 506–508.
Gürkan, A.A. (2008), Recent Developments in Agricultural Commodity Markets: Implications for Vulnerable and Food Insecure Countries and Policy Dimensions. Plenary Paper Presented at the 2nd AIEA2 and USDA International Conference The Economic Implications of Public Support to Agriculture 19–21 June 2008, Bologna, Italy.
Hertel, T.W., Winters, L.A. (2006), Poverty and the WTO: Impacts of the Doha Development Agenda, Palgrave Macmillan and The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Hoekman, B., Ng, F., Olarreaga, M. (2004), Agricultural tariffs or subsidies: Which are more important for developing economies? The World Bank Economic Review 18(2): 175–204.
Howse, R., van Bork, P., Hebebrand, C. (2006), WTO Disciplines and Biofuels: Opportunities and Constraints in the Creation of a Global Marketplace, IPC Discussion Paper, International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Washington, DC.
Kojima, M., Mitchell, D., Ward, W. (2007), Considering Trade Policies for Liquid Biofuels, Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP) World Bank, Washington, DC.
Miranowski, J.A. (2007), Biofuel Incentives and the Energy Title of the 2007 Farm Bill, Working Paper in the 2007 Farm Bill & Beyond, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC.
Mitchell, D. (2008), A Note on Rising Food Prices, Policy Research Working Paper 4682, Development Prospects Group, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Runge, C.F., Senauer, B. (2007), How biofuels could starve the poor, Foreign Affairs 86(3): 41–53, Foreign Affairs Council, New York.
Tyner, W.E. (2007), U.S. Ethanol Policy – Possibilities for the Future, Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Yacobucci, B. (2005), Ethanol Imports and the Caribbean Basin Initiative, Report No. RS21930. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, 6 January.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Price Relationships Between Corn, Ethanol, and Gasoline
Appendix: Price Relationships Between Corn, Ethanol, and Gasoline
A bushel of corn can be converted into ethanol at a constant cost of c 0, resulting in β gallons of ethanol and δ bushels of by-product, which can be sold back in to the corn market. Estimated values of β and δ are 2.8 and 0.31, respectively (Eidman, 2007).
A bushel of corn can be purchased for the market price of corn, P C , and converted to ethanol and corn, resulting in revenue of \(\beta P_{\textrm{E}} + \delta P_{\textrm{C}}\), where P E is the market price of ethanol per gallon. This results in a total marginal profit of \(\pi ' = \beta P_{\textrm{E}} + \left( {\delta - 1} \right)P_{\textrm{C}} - c_0\). Given that markets function well, if marginal profits from converting corn to ethanol are positive, \( \pi ' > 0\), then producers will continue to demand corn for ethanol until the price of ethanol is bid down and the price of corn bid up, resulting in zero marginal profit. Thus, in equilibrium, the price of ethanol and corn must follow the relationship
so long as ethanol is produced in equilibrium. Otherwise, \(P_{\textrm{C}} > ( \beta P_{\textrm{E}} - c_0 )/\break ( 1 - \delta )\), implying negative marginal profits from converting corn to ethanol.
Ethanol can be mixed with gasoline to produce fuel. We treat ethanol as a perfect substitute for gasoline. While fuel containing high concentrations of ethanol (such as E85) can currently only be used by a small percentage of the cars on the road in the United States, nearly all automobiles can use fuel containing lower levels of ethanol (such as E10). Hence, our treatment of ethanol as a perfect substitute for gasoline is an abstraction. However, less than 1% of ethanol is sold in concentrations higher than that found in E10. Thus, for the concentrations of fuel found in the market, ethanol can be reasonably expected to perform as a perfect substitute.
The energy content of ethanol is substantially lower than that of gasoline (by about 30%). We suppose that individuals value ethanol and gasoline for their contributions to vehicle miles traveled. Hence, in equilibrium,
where P G is the market price of gasoline per gallon, and λ is the ratio of miles per gallon derived from ethanol to miles per gallon derived from gasoline (estimated to be 0.70). Again, if this equality did not hold, consumers would be led to adjust their consumption of ethanol and gasoline until equilibrium was achieved. This together with (9.1) implies that
if ethanol is produced.
The introduction of taxes and tax credits fundamentally alter the equilibrium price relationships given in equations (9.6) and (9.7) by altering the profit incentives and the marginal cost of vehicle miles. Let t represent the volumetric tax on all fuel and t c the tax credit awarded to blenders for use of ethanol. Then, we can rewrite equations (9.6) and (9.7), respectively, as
and
where P Eb can be thought of as the bushel-equivalent price of ethanol. Further, it is convenient to define \(P_{{\textrm{Gb}}} \equiv {{\left( {\beta \left[ {\lambda P_{\textrm{G}} + \left( {\lambda - 1} \right)t} \right] - c_0 } \right)} \mathord{\left/{\vphantom {{\left( {\beta \left[ {\lambda P_{\textrm{G}} + \left( {\lambda - 1} \right)t} \right] - c_0 } \right)} {\left( {1 - \delta } \right)}}} \right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {1 - \delta } \right)}}\) as the bushel-equivalent price of gasoline. The implication of equation (9.9) is that for every one cent per gallon change in the price of ethanol, the corn price changes by 4.06 in $ per bushel. This means the corn price is very sensitive to a change in the tax credit or oil price.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Gorter, H., Just, D.R. (2010). Ethanol and Corn Prices: The Role of US Tax Credits, Mandates, and Imports. In: Ball, V., Fanfani, R., Gutierrez, L. (eds) The Economic Impact of Public Support to Agriculture. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6385-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6385-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6384-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6385-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)