Skip to main content

Disability and Aging: Historical and Contemporary Views

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disability and Aging Discrimination

Abstract

The seeds of modern disability and aging policy may be traced to the legacy of the American Civil War and its expansive disability pension scheme. Though not a rehabilitation, aging, or welfare scheme per se, the Civil War pension laws set out America’s first large-scale policy of compensation for select men and “worthy disabled,” and led to a medical model of disability and America’s first comprehensive federal retirement program. The post-Civil War shift toward the classification of disability laid the groundwork for subsequent federal policies. This chapter overviews the pension scheme, discusses our related investigation of veterans with disabilities as they aged, and examines the implications of this study for attitudes and policy toward persons with disabilities, with emphasis on the disabled as they age in workplaces, as today’s veterans, and as global citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, D. L., & Anderson, G. T. (1984). Nostalgia and malingering in the military during the civil war. Perspectives on Biology and Medicine, 28(1), 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrears of pensions (1881, November 12). New York Times, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baack, B., & Ray, E. J. (1988). Federal transfer payments in American: Veterans’ pensions and the rise of social security. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, L. W. (1889, January). A raid upon the treasury. Forum, 6, 540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagenstos, S. R. (2000). Subordination, stigma, and “disability.” Virginia Law Review, 86(3), 397–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagenstos, S. R. (2004). The future of disability law. Yale Law Journal, 114(1), 1–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagenstos, S. (2006). The perversity of limited civil rights remedies: The case of “abusive” ADA litigation. UCLA Law Review, 54(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, P., Morris, M., Hartnette, J., & Blanck, P. (2006). Breaking the cycle of poverty: Asset accumulation by people with disabilities. Disability Studies, 26(1). Retrieved from http://www.dsq-sds-archives.org/_articles_html/2006/winter/ball.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. S., & Sherraden, M. W. (2005). Institutions and inclusion in saving policy. In N. Retsinas & E. Belsky (Eds.), Building assets, building credit: Bridges and barriers to financial services in low-income communities (pp. 286–315). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynton, D. C. (2000). Disability and the justification of inequality in American history. In L. Umansky & P. K. Longmore (Eds.), The new disability history: American perspectives (pp. 33–57). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilmes, L. (2007). Soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan: The long–term costs of providing veterans medical care and disability benefits. Kennedy School Working Paper, RWP07-001. Retrieved from http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP07-001.

  • Blanck, P. (2001). Civil war pensions and disability. Ohio State Law Journal, 62, 109–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, P. (2005a). Americans with disabilities and their civil rights: Past, present, future. University of Pittsburg Law Review, 66(4), 687–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, P. (2005b). The Burton Blatt Institute: Centers of innovation on disability at Syracuse University. Syracuse Law Review, 56, 201–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, P. (2008). “The right to live in the world”: Disability yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, 56, 369–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, P., Hill, E., Siegal, C., & Waterstone, M. (2009). Disability civil rights law and policy: Cases and materials (2nd ed.). Minnesota: Thomson/West Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, P., & Millender, M. (2000). Before civil rights: Civil war pensions and the politics of disability in America. Alabama Law Review, 52(1), 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, P., & Song, C. (2001). “With malice toward none: With charity toward all”: Civil war pensions for native and foreign–born union army veterans. Journal of Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 11(1), 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, P., & Song, C. (2002). Civil war pension attorneys and disability politics. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 35, 137–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, H. V. (1898). Fraudulent practices of the pension sharks: Uselessness of pension attorneys. Harper’s Weekly, 42, 230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., & Mont, D. (2008). Disability and poverty: A survey of world bank poverty assessments and implications. SP World Bank Discussion Paper 0805. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DISABILITY/Resources/280658-1172608138489/WBPovertyAssessments.pdf.

  • Burgdorf, R. L., Jr. (2008). Restoring the ADA and beyond: Disability in the 21st century. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, 13, 241–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhauser, R. V., & Stapleton, D. C. (2003). Introduction. In R. V. Burkhauser & D. C. Stapleton (Eds.), The decline in employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle (pp. 1–21). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton Blatt Institute. (2007a). Entrepreneurship boot camp for veterans with disabilities. Retrieved from http://bbi.syr.edu/projects/ebv_veterans_bootcamp.htm#applyebv.

  • Burton Blatt Institute. (2007b). María Verónica Reina. Retrieved from http://bbi.syr.edu/staff/reina.

  • Burton Blatt Institute. (2007c). BBI projects. Retrieved from http://bbi.syr.edu/projects/.

  • Burton Blatt Institute. (2008). http://bbi.syr.edu.

  • Cantor, N. (2008). The two-way street of scholarship in action. Retrieved from http://www.syr.edu/chancellor/speeches/2wayst_SIA_University_Address_031808.pdf.

  • Colker, R. (2005). The disability pendulum: The first decade of the Americans with disabilities act. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, D. L. (1998). The evolution of retirement: An American economic history, 1880–1990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, D. L. (2008). The rise of retirement among African Americans: Evidence from union army records. NBER Working Paper No. w14462. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=1297692.

  • Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2008). Health, stress, and social networks: Evidence from union army veterans. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 14053. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14053.

  • Crossley, M. (1999). The disability kaleidoscope. Notre Dame Law Review, 74(3), 621–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, F. & Webster, W. (Eds.) (1885). Digest of pension laws, decisions, rulings, orders, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWit, L. ( 2003 ). Social insurance in the gilded age/progressive era. Retrieved from http://www.larrydewitt.net/SSinGAPE/lawyer.htm.

  • Dean, E. T. (1997). Shook over hell: Post–traumatic stress, Vietnam, and the civil war. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, M. R. (1952). Veterans in politics: The story of the G.A.R. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein, R. (2008). tenBroek Symposium transcript (on file with author).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drimmer, J. C. (1993). Cripples, overcomers, and civil rights: Tracing the evolution of federal legislation and social policy for people with disabilities. UCLA Law Review, 40, 1341–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1531–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (1881, January 26). New York Times, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D. (2008). Disability, poverty, and schooling in developing countries: Results from 14 household surveys. World Bank Economic Review, 22(1), 141–163. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1146055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro, C. J. (2008). Constituent service agency decision making and legislative influence on the bureaucracy in the post civil war era (unpublished manuscript on file with author).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R. W. (1996). Public use tape on the aging veterans of the union army, Version S-0 (Advance Release). Surgeon’s Certificates, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York and Illinois Regiments, 1860–1940, Data User’s Manual 135–36, 140–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R. W., et al. (2006). Aging of veterans of the union army: Military, pension, and medical records, 1820–1840. University of Chicago, Center for Population Economics. Retrieved from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/ICPSR/STUDY/06837.xml.

  • Gerber, D. A. (2001). Disabled veterans and public welfare policy: Comparative and transnational perspectives on western states in the twentieth century. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 11(1), 77–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasson, W. H. (1918). Federal military pensions in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at http://www.archive.org/stream/federalmilitaryp00glasuoft/federalmilitaryp00glasuoft_djvu.txt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Partnership for Disability & Development. (“GPDD”) (2008). Feature: GPDD Welcomes Maria Reina as the 1st Executive Director. Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALPROTECTION/EXTDISABILITY/0,contentMDK:21036173~pagePK:210058~piPK:210062~theSitePK:282699,00.html.

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, B. A. (1869). Investigations in the military and anthropological statistics of American soldiers. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office. (“GAO”) (2008). Federal disability programs: More strategic coordination could help overcome challenges to needed transformation. Government Accountability Office–08–653. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08635.pdf.

  • Gunderson, M., & Hyatt, D. (1996). Do injured workers pay for reasonable accommodation? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickel, K. W. (2001). Medicine, bureaucracy and social welfare: The politics of disability compensation for American veterans of World War I. In L. Umansky & P. K. Longmore (Eds.), The new disability history: American perspectives (pp. 236–267). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, A. (2006). A military–civilian coalition for disability rights. Mississippi Law Journal, 75, 975–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B. (1986). In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. J. (1998). Creating a national home: Building the veterans’ welfare state, 1860–1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klages, M. (1999). Woeful afflictions: Disability and sentimentality in Victorian America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (2003). Health and wealth accumulation: Evidence from nineteenth-century America. NBER Working Paper 10035. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w10035.

  • Liachowitz, C. H. (1988). Disability as a social construct: Legislative roots. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logue, L., & Blanck, P. (2004). “There is nothing that promotes longevity like a pension:” Public policy and mortality of Civil War Union army veterans. Wake Forest Law Review, 39(1), 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logue, L., & Blanck, P. (2008). “Benefit of the doubt:” African–American civil war veterans and pensions. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 38(3), 377–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logue, L., & Blanck, P. (2010). Race, ethnicity, and disability: Veterans and benefits in post– civil war America. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markin, K. M. (2005). Still crazy after all these years: The enduring defamatory power of mental disorder. Law and Psychology Review, 29, 155–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D., & Miller, H. (1976). Poverty and proletariat. In R. Merton & R. Nisbet (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 641–673). New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, S. C. (1992). Glorious contentment: The grand army of the Republic, 1865–1900. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurray, D. L. (1922). The political significance of the pension question. Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 9(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, S. (2006). Role of the tax code in asset development for people with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 26(1), Retrieved from http://www.dsq-sds-archives.org/_articles_html/2006/winter/mendelsohn.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani, A. A. (1999). Living in the world: A new look at the disabled in the law of torts. Catholic University Law Review, 48, 323–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont, D. (2007). Measuring disability prevalence. SP World Bank Discussion Paper 07/06. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DISABILITY/Resources/Data/MontPrevalence.pdf.

  • Mor, S. (2006). Between charity, welfare, and warfare: A disability legal studies analysis of privilege and neglect in Israeli disability policy. Yale Journal of Law and Humanities, 18(2), 63–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermann, C. E. (1965). A history of vocational rehabilitation in America. Minneapolis, MN: T.S. Denison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. W. (1917). History of civil war military pensions, 1861–1885. Bulletin of University of Wisconsin History Series, 4(1), 1–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orloff, A. S. (1993). The politics of pensions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, M. (2008). Through the wild cathedral evening: Barriers, attitudes participatory democracy, professor tenBroek, and the rights of persons with mental disabilities. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, 13(2), 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. C., Link, B. G., & Dovidio, J. F. (2008). Stigma and prejudice: One animal or two? Social Science and Medicine, 67, 358–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, G. (2008). The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A declaration of independence for persons with disabilities in the 21st century, Keynote Presentation at the 21st Rehabilitation International Global Conference, Quebec City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, G. (in press). Resisting the “temptation of elegance”: Can the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities socialise states to right behaviour? In O. M. Arnardóttir & G. Quinn (Eds.), The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reina, M. V., Adya, M., & Blanck, P. (2007). Defying double discrimination. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 8(1), 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff, H. (2001). The changing role of America’s veterans. NBER Working Paper 8595. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w8595.

  • Rothstein, L. (2008). Strategic advocacy in fulfilling the goals of disability policy: Is the only question how full the glass is? Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, 13, 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinow, I. M. (1913). Social insurance: With special reference to American conditions. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salm, M. (2007). The effect of pensions on longevity: Evidence from union army veterans. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2668. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=977517

  • Sanders, H. T. (1980). Paying for the “bloody shirt”: The politics of civil war pensions. In B. S. Rundquist (Ed.), Political benefits: Empirical studies of American public programs (pp. 137–159). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schartz, H., Hendricks, D. J., & Blanck, P. (2006). Workplace accommodations: Evidence–based outcomes. Work, 27, 345–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schartz, H., Schartz, K., Hendricks, D. J., & Blanck, P. (2006). Workplace accommodations: Empirical study of current employees. Mississippi Law Journal, 75, 917–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, L., Kruse, D., Blasi, J., & Blanck, P. (2009). Is disability disabling in all workplaces? disability, workplace disparities, and corporate culture. Industrial Relations, 48(3), 381–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwochau, S., & Blanck, P. (2003). Does the ADA disable the disabled? more comments. Industry Relations, 42(1), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotch, R. K. (2001). From good will to civil rights: Transforming federal disability policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, R., Song, C., Smith, R., Bauman, N., & Blanck, P. (2004). Union army veterans with hearing loss and the evolution of disability in America during 1862–1920. The Laryngoscope, 114(12), 2147–2153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. R. (2004). After the glory: The struggles of black civil war veterans. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherraden, M. (1991). Assets and the poor: A new American welfare policy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1993). America’s first social security system: The expansion of benefits for civil war veterans. Political Science Quarterly, 108(1), 85–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, W. M. (1891). Pensions and socialism. Century, 42(5), 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, H. W. (1892). Pensions: Time to call a halt. Forum, 12, 646–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoils unevenly divided (“Spoils”) (1894, March 27). New York Times, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D.A. (1984). The disabled state. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • tenBroek, J. (1966). The right to live in the world: The disabled in the law of torts. California Law Review, 54(1), 841–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Democrats and the pensions. (“The Democrats”) (1898, December 9). New York Times, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Pension Arrears Bill (1878, June 27). New York Times, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • The new pension raid. (1899). Nation, 69(1799), 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbull, M. M. (1889). Pensions for all. Popular Science Monthly, 35(6), 724–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veterans for Common Sense v. Peake, 563 F. Supp. 2d 1049 (N.D. Cal. 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinovskis, M. A. (1990). Have social historians lost the Civil War? Some preliminary demographic speculations. In M. A. Vinovskis (Ed.), Toward a social history of the American civil war (pp. 1–30). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J. D. (1893). Half a million dollars a day for pensions. Forum, 15, 439–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterstone, M., & Stein, M. (2008). Disabling prejudice. Northwestern University Law Review, 102(3), 1351–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, L. P., & Jamesy, E. H. (2005). Challenges of organizational learning: Perpetuation of discrimination against employees with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23(1), 123–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author’s Note: University Professor and Chairman Burton Blatt Institute (BBI), Syracuse University; Ph.D. Psychology, Harvard University; J.D., Stanford Law School. The program of research described herein is supported in part by grants from: (a) The National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR), US Department of Education, for (i) “The Asset Accumulation and Economic Self-Sufficiency Project,” Grant No. H133A090014; (ii) “Demand Side Employment Placement Models,” Grant No. H133A060033; (iii) “Southeast Disability & Business Technical Assistance Center,” Grant No. H133A060094; and (iv) “Center on Effective Delivery of Rehabilitation Technology by Vocational Rehabilitation Agencies,” Grant No. H133A090004; (b) The Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) for “Technical Assistance and Continuing Education (TACE) Center Region IV (Southeast TACE),” Grant No. H264A080021, (c) the US Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP), for the “Disability Case Study Research Consortium on Employer Organizational Practices in Employing People with Disabilities,” Grant/Contract #E-9-4-6-0107, (d) the US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, for “New York’s Comprehensive Medicaid Infrastructure Grant (MIG),” Grant #1QACMS030318. I gratefully acknowledge the support of NIH/NIA grant number P01 AG10120, “Early Indicators of Later Work Levels, Disease and Death” – Robert Fogel, principal investigator. Colleagues at the Nebraska Symposium on Disability and Aging, particularly Rich Wiener, as well as Larry Logue, William Myhill, and research assistants at BBI provided most helpful comments. This article summarizes research with many colleagues, with relevant articles at http://bbi.syr.edu. Portions are drawn from Blanck (2008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Blanck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blanck, P. (2011). Disability and Aging: Historical and Contemporary Views. In: Wiener, R., Willborn, S. (eds) Disability and Aging Discrimination. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6293-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics