Abstract
The epigram centers on the eternal question of competitive balance: How likely is it that early-season fan hopes for postseason play are realized? The epigram also points out how confusing a discussion of balance can become; how can the NFL go from “clearly stratified” to a tribute to balance in 2 years? In this chapter, I pursue an assessment of competitive balance in the NFL in order to shed light on this eternal question. Such an assessment also clarifies where and when balance in the NFL became an issue, if it ever was.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brandt G (2011, Feb 7) Super-competitive balance. NFL.com http://blogs.nfl.com/2011/02/07/brandt-super-competitive-balance/. Accessed 8 March 2011
Fort R (2008) U.S. sports leagues through the economic crystal ball. In: Howard D, Humphreys B (eds) The business of sports, vol 1. Praeger, Westport, CT, pp 187–224
Fort R (2011) Sports economics, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Fort R, Lee YH (2007) Structural change, competitive balance, and the rest of the major leagues. Econ Inq 45:519–532
Fort R, Maxcy J (2003) Comment: competitive balance in sports leagues: an introduction. J Sports Econ 4:154–160
Fort R, Quirk J (1995) Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. J Econ Lit 23:1265–1299
Gleason M (2009, Nov 11). New England patriots and competitive balance in the NFL. Bleacerreport.com http://bleacherreport.com/articles/288505-competitive-balance-and-the-patriots. Accessed 8 March 2011
Owen PD (2010) Limitations of the relative standard deviation of win percentages for measuring competitive balance in sports leagues. Econ Lett 109:38–41
Quirk J, Fort RD (1992) Pay dirt: the business of pro team sports. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Rottenberg S (1956) The baseball players’ labor market. J Polit Econ 64:242–258
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: NFL RSD, 1922–2010
Year | ASD | N | ISD | RSD | Year | ASD | N | ISD | RSD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1922 | 0.30 | 9 | 0.17 | 1.82 | 1960 | 0.23 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.57 |
1923 | 0.30 | 8 | 0.18 | 1.71 | 1961 | 0.21 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.58 |
1924 | 0.31 | 10 | 0.16 | 1.95 | 1962 | 0.25 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.90 |
1925 | 0.31 | 10 | 0.16 | 1.97 | 1963 | 0.25 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.88 |
1926 | 0.29 | 12 | 0.14 | 2.00 | 1964 | 0.21 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.54 |
1927 | 0.29 | 11 | 0.15 | 1.93 | 1965 | 0.19 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.41 |
1928 | 0.30 | 12 | 0.14 | 2.09 | 1966 | 0.21 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.57 |
1929 | 0.31 | 13 | 0.14 | 2.24 | 1967 | 0.23 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.73 |
Average | 1.96 | 1968 | 0.25 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.85 | |||
1930 | 0.24 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.68 | 1969 | 0.25 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.84 |
1931 | 0.25 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.75 | Average | 1.69 | |||
1932 | 0.26 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.83 | 1970 | 0.22 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.61 |
1933 | 0.22 | 11 | 0.15 | 1.45 | 1971 | 0.19 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.46 |
1934 | 0.27 | 11 | 0.15 | 1.79 | 1972 | 0.23 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.70 |
1935 | 0.22 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.49 | 1973 | 0.23 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.74 |
1936 | 0.26 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.81 | 1974 | 0.20 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.48 |
1937 | 0.26 | 11 | 0.15 | 1.70 | 1975 | 0.25 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.88 |
1938 | 0.21 | 11 | 0.15 | 1.42 | 1976 | 0.25 | 14 | 0.13 | 1.88 |
1939 | 0.32 | 11 | 0.15 | 2.10 | 1977 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.70 |
Average | 1.70 | 1978 | 0.17 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.38 | |||
1940 | 0.25 | 11 | 0.15 | 1.65 | 1979 | 0.17 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.39 |
1941 | 0.30 | 11 | 0.15 | 1.99 | Average | 1.62 | |||
1942 | 0.33 | 11 | 0.15 | 2.19 | 1980 | 0.19 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.49 |
1943 | 0.28 | 10 | 0.16 | 1.80 | 1981 | 0.17 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.39 |
1944 | 0.36 | 10 | 0.16 | 2.29 | 1982 | 0.21 | 9 | 0.17 | 1.28 |
1945 | 0.28 | 10 | 0.16 | 1.75 | 1983 | 0.17 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.40 |
1946 | 0.21 | 11 | 0.15 | 1.40 | 1984 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.68 |
1947 | 0.20 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.36 | 1985 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.64 |
1948 | 0.28 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.91 | 1986 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.67 |
1949 | 0.27 | 16 | 0.13 | 2.16 | 1987 | 0.17 | 15 | 0.13 | 1.35 |
Average | 1.85 | 1988 | 0.17 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.35 | |||
1950 | 0.25 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.70 | 1989 | 0.18 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.44 |
1951 | 0.25 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.73 | Average | 1.47 | |||
1952 | 0.19 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.35 | 1990 | 0.20 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.62 |
1953 | 0.28 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.94 | 1991 | 0.22 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.74 |
1954 | 0.21 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.49 | 1992 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.65 |
1955 | 0.18 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.27 | 1993 | 0.16 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.28 |
1956 | 0.18 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.24 | 1994 | 0.18 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.40 |
1957 | 0.17 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.20 | 1995 | 0.15 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.22 |
1958 | 0.25 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.71 | 1996 | 0.18 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.47 |
1959 | 0.23 | 12 | 0.14 | 1.57 | 1997 | 0.18 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.46 |
Average | 1.52 | 1998 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.71 | |||
1999 | 0.19 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.49 | |||||
Average | 1.51 | ||||||||
2000 | 0.20 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.58 | |||||
2001 | 0.20 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.63 | |||||
2002 | 0.17 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.32 | |||||
2003 | 0.19 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.54 | |||||
2004 | 0.19 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.54 | |||||
2005 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.69 | |||||
2006 | 0.18 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.45 | |||||
2007 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.66 | |||||
2008 | 0.21 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.66 | |||||
2009 | 0.20 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.61 | |||||
Average | 1.57 | ||||||||
2010 | 0.19 | 16 | 0.13 | 1.50 |
Source: Rod’s Sports Data, http://www.rodneyfort.com
Appendix 2: NFL Conference Playoff Teams, 1970–2010
Year | Teams | Last appearance | Year | Teams | Last appearance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1970 | BalColtsb | 1968 | 1976 | Mina | 1974 |
Dala | 1967 | Oakb | 1975 | ||
Oak | 1969 | LARams | 1975 | ||
SF | First time | Pit | 1975 | ||
Average years W/O | 6.5 | Average years W/O | 1.25 | ||
New teams | 3 | New teams | 1 | ||
1971 | Dalb | 1970 | 1977 | Dalb | 1973 |
Miaa | First time | Dena | First time | ||
SF | 1970 | Min | 1976 | ||
BalColts | 1970 | Oak | 1976 | ||
Average years W/O | 2 | Average years W/O | 5.75 | ||
New teams | 1 | New teams | 2 | ||
1972 | Miab | 1971 | 1978 | Dala | 1977 |
Wasa | 1945 | Pitb | 1976 | ||
Pit | First time | LARams | 1976 | ||
Dal | 1971 | HouOilers | 1967 | ||
Average years W/O | 17 | Average years W/O | 4 | ||
New teams | 2 | New teams | 3 | ||
1973 | Miab | 1972 | 1979 | Pitb | 1978 |
Mina | 1969 | LARamsa | 1978 | ||
Oak | 1970 | HouOilers | 1978 | ||
Dal | 1972 | TB | First time | ||
Average years W/O | 2.25 | Average years W/O | 1.5 | ||
New teams | 2 | New teams | 1 | ||
1974 | Mina | 1973 | 1980 | Phila | 1960 |
Pitb | 1972 | Oakb | 1977 | ||
LARams | 1955 | Dal | 1978 | ||
Oak | 1973 | SD | 1965 | ||
Average years W/O | 5.75 | Average years W/O | 10 | ||
New teams | 2 | New teams | 4 | ||
1975 | Dala | 1973 | 1981 | Cina | First time |
Pitb | 1974 | SFb | 1971 | ||
LARams | 1974 | SD | 1980 | ||
Oak | 1974 | Dal | 1980 | ||
Average years W/O | 1.25 | Average years W/O | 6.25 | ||
New teams | 1 | New teams | 2 | ||
1982 | Wasb | 1972 | 1988 | Cina | 1981 |
Miaa | 1972 | SFb | 1984 | ||
Dal | 1980 | Buf | 1966 | ||
NYJ | 1969 | Chi | 1985 | ||
Average years W/O | 8.75 | Average years W/O | 9 | ||
New teams | 3 | New teams | 4 | ||
1983 | LARaidersb | First time | 1989 | Dena | 1987 |
Wasa | 1982 | SFb | 1988 | ||
Sea | First time | Cle | 1987 | ||
SF | 1981 | LARams | 1985 | ||
Average years W/O | 2.75 | Average years W/O | 2.25 | ||
New teams | 3 | New teams | 3 | ||
1984 | Miaa | 1982 | 1990 | Bufa | 1988 |
SFb | 1983 | NYGb | 1986 | ||
Pit | 1979 | LARaiders | First time | ||
Chi | 1963 | SF | 1989 | ||
Average years W/O | 7.25 | Average years W/O | 3.75 | ||
New teams | 3 | New teams | 3 | ||
1985 | Chib | 1984 | 1991 | Bufa | 1990 |
NEa | 1963 | Wasb | 1987 | ||
LARams | 1979 | Den | 1989 | ||
Mia | 1982 | Det | 1957 | ||
Average years W/O | 8 | Average years W/O | 10.25 | ||
New teams | 2 | New teams | 3 | ||
1986 | Dena | 1977 | 1992 | Dalb | 1982 |
NYGb | 1963 | Bufa | 1991 | ||
Cle | 1969 | SF | 1990 | ||
Was | 1982 | Mia | 1985 | ||
Average years W/O | 13.25 | Average years W/O | 5 | ||
New teams | 4 | New teams | 3 | ||
1987 | Dena | 1986 | 1993 | Dalb | 1992 |
Wasb | 1986 | Bufa | 1992 | ||
Cle | 1986 | SF | 1992 | ||
Min | 1977 | KC | 1969 | ||
Average years W/O | 3.25 | Average years W/O | 6.75 | ||
New teams | 1 | New teams | 1 | ||
1994 | SDa | 1981 | 2000 | NYGa | 1990 |
SFb | 1993 | BalRavensb | First time | ||
Pit | 1984 | Min | 1998 | ||
Dal | 1993 | Oak | 1980 | ||
Average years W/O | 6.25 | Average years W/O | 9 | ||
New teams | 2 | New teams | 4 | ||
1995 | Pita | 1994 | 2001 | NEb | 1996 |
Dalb | 1994 | StLRamsa | 1999 | ||
Ind | First time | Pit | 1997 | ||
GB | 1967 | Phil | 1980 | ||
Average years W/O | 10.25 | Average years W/O | 8 | ||
New teams | 2 | New teams | 4 | ||
1996 | GBb | 1995 | 2002 | Oaka | 2000 |
NEa | 1985 | TBb | 1999 | ||
Carol | First time | Ten | 1999 | ||
Jax | First time | Phil | 2001 | ||
Average years W/O | 3.5 | Average years W/O | 2.25 | ||
New teams | 3 | New teams | 3 | ||
1997 | GBa | 1996 | 2003 | NEb | 2001 |
Denb | 1991 | Carola | 1996 | ||
SF | 1994 | Ind | 1995 | ||
Pit | 1995 | Phil | 2002 | ||
Average years W/O | 3 | Average years W/O | 4.5 | ||
New teams | 3 | New teams | 3 | ||
1998 | Denb | 1997 | 2004 | NEb | 2003 |
Atla | First time | Phila | 2003 | ||
NYJ | 1982 | Pit | 2001 | ||
Min | 1987 | Atl | 1998 | ||
Average years W/O | 15 | Average years W/O | 2.75 | ||
New teams | 3 | New teams | 2 | ||
1999 | StLRamsb | First time | 2005 | Seaa | 1983 |
Tena | First time | Pitb | 2004 | ||
TB | 1979 | Carol | 2003 | ||
Jax | 1996 | Den | 1998 | ||
Average years W/O | 7.25 | Average years W/O | 8 | ||
New teams | 4 | New teams | 3 | ||
2006 | Chia | 1988 | |||
Indb | 2003 | ||||
NO | First time | ||||
NE | 2004 | ||||
Average years W/O | 15.5 | ||||
New teams | 4 | ||||
2007 | NEa | 2006 | |||
NYGb | 2000 | ||||
SD | 1994 | ||||
GB | 1997 | ||||
Average years W/O | 7.75 | ||||
New teams | 3 | ||||
2008 | Pitb | 2005 | |||
Ariza | First time | ||||
BalRavens | 2000 | ||||
Phil | 2004 | ||||
Average years W/O | 8.75 | ||||
New teams | 4 | ||||
2009 | NOb | 2006 | |||
Inda | 2006 | ||||
Min | 2000 | ||||
NYJ | 1998 | ||||
Average years W/O | 6.5 | ||||
New teams | 4 | ||||
2010 | Pita | 2008 | |||
GBb | 2007 | ||||
NYJ | 2009 | ||||
Chi | 2006 | ||||
Average years W/O | 2.5 | ||||
New teams | 3 |
Source: Data from http://pro-football-reference.com
Note: SF began play in 1950. Miami entered the AFL in 1966. Pittsburgh appears for the first time in 1933 as the Pirates, Steelers in 1940. Denver was an original AFL team in 1960. TB expansion team 1976 along with Sea. Cin AFL expansion team 1968. LARaiders began play in 1982. Indianapolis began play in 1984. Atlanta began play in 1966. St. Louis Rams began play in 1995. Tennessee began play in 1997. Baltimore Ravens began play in 1996. Raiders moved to LA in 1982 and back to Oakland in 1995. New Orleand began play in 1967. Phoenix/Arizona Cardinals began play in 1988.
Houston Texans are the only modern NFL team to not make the playoffs. They play in 2002 and have gone the entire 9 years without an appearance.
aSuper Bowl loser.
bSuper Bowl winner.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fort, R. (2012). Competitive Balance in the NFL. In: Quinn, K. (eds) The Economics of the National Football League. Sports Economics, Management and Policy, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6290-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6290-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6289-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6290-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)