Advertisement

Competitive Balance in the NFL

Chapter
Part of the Sports Economics, Management and Policy book series (SEMP, volume 2)

Abstract

The epigram centers on the eternal question of competitive balance: How likely is it that early-season fan hopes for postseason play are realized? The epigram also points out how confusing a discussion of balance can become; how can the NFL go from “clearly stratified” to a tribute to balance in 2 years? In this chapter, I pursue an assessment of competitive balance in the NFL in order to shed light on this ­eternal question. Such an assessment also clarifies where and when balance in the NFL became an issue, if it ever was.

Keywords

Revenue Sharing Free Agency Competitive Balance Super Bowl Pool Sharing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brandt G (2011, Feb 7) Super-competitive balance. NFL.com http://blogs.nfl.com/2011/02/07/brandt-super-competitive-balance/. Accessed 8 March 2011
  2. Fort R (2008) U.S. sports leagues through the economic crystal ball. In: Howard D, Humphreys B (eds) The business of sports, vol 1. Praeger, Westport, CT, pp 187–224Google Scholar
  3. Fort R (2011) Sports economics, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Fort R, Lee YH (2007) Structural change, competitive balance, and the rest of the major leagues. Econ Inq 45:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fort R, Maxcy J (2003) Comment: competitive balance in sports leagues: an introduction. J Sports Econ 4:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fort R, Quirk J (1995) Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. J Econ Lit 23:1265–1299Google Scholar
  7. Gleason M (2009, Nov 11). New England patriots and competitive balance in the NFL. Bleacerreport.com http://bleacherreport.com/articles/288505-competitive-balance-and-the-patriots. Accessed 8 March 2011
  8. Owen PD (2010) Limitations of the relative standard deviation of win percentages for measuring competitive balance in sports leagues. Econ Lett 109:38–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Quirk J, Fort RD (1992) Pay dirt: the business of pro team sports. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Rottenberg S (1956) The baseball players’ labor market. J Polit Econ 64:242–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations