Abstract
The National Football League instituted the reverse order draft for entering players (rookies) in 1936. The NFL system is the original version of a player entry draft, and subsequent draft systems developed by North American team sport leagues are based on this model. The draft determines the initial contract assignment for (most) entering players. The entry draft creates a monopsony situation whereby the player may bargain only with one potential employer. Negotiation leverage for entering players is greatly reduced, and theoretically the monopsony (single buyer) model restrains salaries. As with most restrictions limiting labor mobility, the NFL draft was initially promoted as a tool to remedy competitive imbalance, and has since been defended as necessary to maintain competitive balance. Although the effect of the draft on competitive balance is ambiguous at best, the elimination of a competitive labor market and bargaining power for entering players’ services accomplishes the league’s objective of eliminating bidding competition and quite clearly reduces salaries. Notwithstanding, the very best entering players, the top draft choices, may also possess significant bargaining power. Contract negotiations in these circumstances may reflect a bilateral monopoly outcome where negotiated salaries compare to a competitive market result.
Keywords
- National Football League
- National Collegiate Athletic Association
- Competitive Balance
- Collective Bargaining Agreement
- College Football
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Through its first decade the NFL was comprised of many clubs in small and midsized cities. Carr’s strategy was to build a league of large market teams and his policies included selective punishment for clubs violating this policy reflected this objective (Coenen 2005).
- 2.
During the war, the NFL voted to stop using the term “draft” and referred to players as being on the “preferred negotiations list” (Campbell 1985).
- 3.
Per antitrust law, Smith was awarded treble damages of $2,76,000. The ruling did not open the door to other antitrust challenges to the draft as by the time the appeals process was exhausted in 1978, the draft was established in the CBA and immune from further antitrust scrutiny.
- 4.
Elway had additional leverage in that he was already playing professional baseball and under contract with New York Yankees.
References
Barnett B, Carroll B (1989) Charlie Trippi: a success story. The Coffin Corner 11(1) http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/11-01-359.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2011
Bronars SG (2004) Bargaining in professional football; Why NFL superstars are underpaid. University of Texas, Department of Economics unpublished working paper
Brooks N (2004) Clarett v. National Football League and the Nonstatutory Labor Exemption in Antitrust Suits. Federal Publications, Paper 175
Campbell J (1985) 1936-37 Draft. The Coffin Corner 7(5). http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/07-05-238.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2011
Clarett v. National Football League (2004) 306 F.Supp.2d 379 (S.D.N.Y.)
Clarett v. National Football League, F.3d, No. 04-0943 (2nd Cir. 2004)
Coenen CR (2005) From sandlots to the Super Bowl: the National Football League, 1920–1967. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville
Conlin M, Emerson P (2006) Discrimination in hiring versus retention and promotion: An empirical analysis of within-firm treatment of players in the NFL. J Law Econ Organ 22(1): 115–136
El Hodiri M, Quirk J (1971) An economic model of a professional sports league. J Polit Econ 79:1302–19
Eskenazi G (1990) N.C.A.A. Panel urges looser rules on eligibility and pro drafts, New York Times, May10. http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/10/sports/ncaa-panel-urges-looser-rules-on-eligibility-and-pro-drafts.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2011
Fisher T (1996) Amateurism and intercollegiate athletics: the double standard of section 12.2.4.2.1, 3. Sports L J 1(5)
Fogg J (2010) History of the NFL draft: picking top college football players has evolved into major TV event. http://www.suite101.com/content/history-of-the-nfl-draft-a217416. Accessed 9 Feb 2011
Fort R, Quirk J (1995) Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. J Econ Lit 33:1265–1299
Grier KB, Tollison RD (1994) The rookie draft and competitive balance: the case of professional football. J Econ Behav Organ 25:293–298
Haywood v National Basketball Association, (1971) 401 U.S. 1204
Hendricks W, DeBrock L, Koenker R (2003) Uncertainty, Hiring, and Subsequent Performance: The NFL Draft. J Labor Econ 21(4):857–886
Kogan B (undated) “USFL v. NFL: the challenge beyond the courtroom” m http://www.law.berkeley.edu/sugarman/Sports_Stories_USFL_v_NFL__-_Boris_Kogan.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2011
McCann MA, Rosen JS (2006) Legality of age restrictions in the NBA and the NFL. 56 Case Western Law Review, 731
McCormick RA, McCormick AC (2006) The myth of the student-athlete: the college athlete as employee. Wash L Rev 81:71–157
McCormick RA, McCormick AC (2008) The emperor’s new clothes: lifting the NCAA’s veil of amateurism. San Diego L Rev 45:495–545
McKay R (2009) Conversation with Joel Maxcy and University of Georgia labor relations class in Flowery Branch, Georgia, 5 March
Mirabile M (2007) The NFL rookie cap: an empirical analysis of one of the NFL’s most closely guarded secrets. The Sport Journal 10(3). http://www.thesportjournal.org/2007Journal/Vol10-No3/03mirabile.asp. Accessed 9 Feb 2011
NFL Scouting Combine (undated) History. http://www.nflcombine.net/history. Accessed 9 Feb 2011
Noll RG (1974). Government and the sports business. Brookings Institution
Quirk J, Fort RD (1993) Pay dirt: the business of professional team sports. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Rottenberg S (1956). The baseball players’ labor market. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(3), pp. 242–258
Smith v. Pro Football Inc (1978) 593F.2d 1173–1978
Whittingham R (1992) The meat market: the inside story of the NFL draft. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York
Weiler P, Roberts G (2004) Sports and the law, 3rd Edition, West: St Paul, MN
Williams P (2006) The draft: a year inside the NFL’s search for talent. St. Martin’s Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maxcy, J. (2012). Economics of the NFL Player Entry Draft System. In: Quinn, K. (eds) The Economics of the National Football League. Sports Economics, Management and Policy, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6290-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6290-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6289-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6290-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)