Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Participatory Action Research and Evaluation with Mental Health Self-Help Initiatives: A Theoretical Framework

  • Chapter
Book cover Mental Health Self-Help

Abstract

In deciding whether or not to collaborate with one another in a research partnership, researchers and members of mental health self-help (MHSH) initiatives should address several questions. What values will underlie the partnership? How will power be shared? What will the focus of the research be? What type of knowledge will be sought? How will the knowledge be used? What roles will the different partners play? In this chapter, we present a theoretical framework that aims to clarify how researchers and mental health self-helpers might answer these questions as they co-construct a research project. The framework consists of six elements: (a) values, (b) participation and power-sharing, (c) social programming, (d) knowledge construction, (e) knowledge utilization, and (f) practice. For each element, we discuss the main issues; we illustrate these issues with examples from both our work and that of others; and we note lessons learned and provide recommendations for future research and evaluation with MHSH initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abma, R. A., & Stake, R. E. (2001). Stake’s responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution. New Directions in Evaluation, 92, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. E., Mayfield, M. V., Mehta, M. P., & Rukonge, A. (2002). Participatory evaluation of reproductive health care quality in developing countries. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 269–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D. (2009a). How people can benefit from mental health consumer-run organizations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 177–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D. (2009b). Making it sane: Using narrative to explore theory in a mental health consumer-run organization. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 243–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Shepherd, M. D., Merkle, E. C., Wituk, S. A., & Meissen, G. (2008). Understanding how participation in consumer-run organizations relates to recovery. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 167–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burti, L., Amaddeo, F., Ambrose, M., Bonetto, C., Cristofalo, D., Ruggeri, M., & Tansella, M. (2005). Does additional care provided by a consumer self-help group improve psychiatric outcomes? A study based in an Italian community-based psychiatric service. Community Mental Health Journal, 41, 705–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2005). The historical and philosophical development of peer-run support programs. In S. Clay, B. Schell, P. W. Corrigan, & R. O. Ralph (Eds.), On our own, together: Peer program for people with mental illness (pp. 17–64). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargo, M., & Mercer, S. L. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 325–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J. (1978). On our own: Patient-controlled alternatives to the mental health system. Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J. (1984). Speaking for ourselves: An overview of the ex-psychiatric patients’ movement. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 8(2), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J. (1990). The ex-psychiatric patients’ movement: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H.-T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1998). In the sleep room: The story of the CIA brainwashing experiments in Canada. Toronto, ON: Key Porter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino, V., & Nelson, G. (1995). Changing relationships between self-help groups and mental health professionals: Shifting ideology and power. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 14(2), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Shadish, W. R. Jr. (1986). Program evaluation: The worldly science. Annual Review of Program Evaluation, 37, 193–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W. (2006). Impact of consumer-operated services on empowerment and recovery of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1493–1496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., Slopen, N., Gracia, G., Phelan, Keogh, C. B., & Keck, L. (2005). Some recovery processes in mutual-help groups for persons with mental illness; II: Qualitative analysis of participant interviews. Community Mental Health Journal, 41, 721–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch A. (1948). The shame of the states. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewa, C. S., Durbin, J., Wasylenki, D., Ochocka, J., Eastabrook, S., Boydell, K. M., & Goering, P. (2002). Considering a multisite study? How to take the leap and have a soft landing. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. I., & Scriven, M. (2003). Diverse visions for evaluation in the new millennium: Should we integrate or embrace diversity? In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social programs: Visions for the new millennium (pp. 3–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, B. (1994). Something is happening: The contemporary consumer and psychiatric survivor movement in historical context. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 15, 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, B. (1998). Participation or exploitation? Consumers and psychiatric survivors as partners in planning mental health services. International Journal of Mental Health, 27, 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. New York: The Apex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M. (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., Torre, M. E., Boudin, K., Bowen, I., Clark, J., Hylton, D., Martinez, M., Missy, Roberts, R. A., Smart, P., & Upegui, D. (2003). Participatory action research: From within and beyond prison bars. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley, Qualitative research in psychology (pp. 173–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. A., & Ball, T. J. (2003). Tribal participatory research: Mechanisms of a collaborative model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 207–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D., & Valenzuela, A. (2005). Critical ethnography: The politics of collaboration. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 217–234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frechtling, J. A. (2007). Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J., Nelson, G., & Mitchell, T. (2008). Negotiating the challenges of participatory action research: Relationships, power, participation, change, and credibility. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (2nd ed., pp. 589–607). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E.R. (2004). The role of the evaluator in a political world. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 19, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinshaw, S.P., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). Stigma and mental disorder: Conceptions of illness, public attitudes, personal disclosure, and social policy. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 555–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. (2007). Insider-outsider: Activating the hyphen. Action Research, 5(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D., Loomis, C., Humphreys, K., & Maton, K. (2004). Self-help research: Issues of power sharing. In L. Jason, C. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. Taylor, M. Davis, J. Durlak, & D. Isenberg (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 123–137). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B.A., Schulz, A.J., Parker, E.A., & Becker, A.B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N., Ochocka, J., Wise J., Janzen, R., & the Taking Culture Seriously Partners (2007). Inspiring knowledge mobilization through a communications policy: The case of a Community University Research Alliance. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education and Action, 1(1), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, R., Nelson, G., Hausfather, N., & Ochocka, J. (2007). Capturing system level activities and impacts of mental health consumer-run organizations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 287–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, R., Nelson, G., Trainor, J., & Ochocka, J. (2006). A longitudinal study of mental health consumer/survivor initiatives: Part IV – Benefits beyond the self? A quantitative and qualitative study of system-level activities and impacts. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, M., Teague, G., & Herr, E. M. (2005). Common ingredients as a fidelity measure for peer-run programs. In S. Clay, B. Schell, P. W. Corrigan, & R. O. Ralph (Eds.), On our own, together: Peer program for people with mental illness (pp. 213–238). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M., Humphreys, K., & Borkman, T. (1994), The naturalistic paradigm as an approach to research with mutual-help groups. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding self-help organizations (pp. 172–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 303–342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, D., Weaver Randall, K., & Corrigan, P.W. (2005). Research methods for exploring and assessing recovery. In R. O. Ralph & P. W. Corrigan (Eds.), Recovery in mental illness: Broadening our understanding of wellness (pp. 19–59). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D.M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D.M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, M., & Cohen, D. (1996). Extremely unbalanced: Interest divergence and power disparities between clients and psychiatry. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 19, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J.A., & Jordan, G.B. (2004). Using logic models. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 7–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitten, C., Adair, C. E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S. B., & Perry, B. W. (2007). Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Quarterly, 85, 729–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, C. T., Bybee, D., Holter, M. C., & Lewandoswki, L. (2006). Validation of a fidelity rating instrument for consumer-operated services. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. (1994). The development of a mental health coalition: A case study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 229–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Janzen, R., Trainor, J., & Ochocka, J. (2008). Putting values into practice: Public policy and the future of mental health consumer-run organizations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 192–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., & Lomotey, J. (2006). Quantity and quality of participation and outcomes of participation in mental health consumer/survivor initiatives. Journal of Mental Health, 15, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Lord, J., & Ochocka, J. (2001) Shifting the paradigm in community mental health: Towards empowerment and community. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Janzen, R., Trainor, J., Goering, P., & Lomotey, J. (2007). A longitudinal study of mental health consumer/survivor initiatives: Part V – Outcomes at three-year follow-up. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 655–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Lauzon, S., Towndrow, J., & Cheng, R. (2005). Disseminating the findings of a longitudinal study of mental health Consumer/Survivor Initiatives in Ontario. The Community Psychologist, 38(2), 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Lord, J., & Ochocka, J. (2001) Shifting the paradigm in community mental health: Towards empowerment and community. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Griffin, K., & Lord, J. (1998). Nothing about me, without me: Participatory action research with self-help/mutual aid organizations for psychiatric consumer/survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 881–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Janzen, R., & Trainor, J. (2006). A longitudinal study of mental health consumer/survivor initiatives: Part I – Literature review and overview of the study. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Janzen, R., Trainor, J., & Lauzon, S. (2004). A comprehensive evaluation approach for mental health consumer-run organizations: Values, conceptualization, design, and action. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 19(3), 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochocka, J., Janzen, R., & Nelson, G. (2002). Sharing power and knowledge: Professional and mental health consumer/survivor researchers working together in a participatory action research project. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25, 379–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochocka, J., Nelson, G., Janzen, R., & Trainor, J. (2006). A longitudinal study of mental health consumer/survivor initiatives: Part III – A qualitative study of impacts of participation on new members. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistrang, N., Barker, C., & Humphries, K. (2008). Mutual help groups for mental health problems: A review of effectiveness studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 110–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (2008). The role of power in wellness, oppression, and liberation: The promise of psychopolitical validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 116–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (2009). Community psychology: Advancing social justice. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 126–143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma, J. (2008). Balancing power among academic and community partners: The case of El Proyecto Bienestar. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(2), 17–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J., Seidman, E., Toro, P. A., McFadden, L. S., Reischl, T. M., Roberts, L. J., Salem, D. A., Stein, C. H., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1985). Finishing the unfinished business: Collaborative research with a mutual help organization. Social Policy, 16, 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, P., Cornell, S., D’Costa, B., Janzen, R., & Ochocka, J. (2002). From our perspective: Consumer researchers speak about their experience in a community mental health research project. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25, 403–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. J., Salem, D. A., Rappaport, J., Toro, P. A., Luke, D. A., & Seidman, E. (1999). Giving and receiving help: Interpersonal transactions in mutual-help meetings and psychosocial adjustment of members. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 841–868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M., Bellamy, C., Baranoski, M., Wieland, M., O’Connell, M. J., Benedict, P., Davidson, L., Buchanan, J., & Sells, D. (2007). A peer-support group intervention to reduce substance use and criminality among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 58, 955–961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, B., & Ogborne, A. (1991). Program logic models: Expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 6, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K., Green, J., Lincoln, Y., Mathison, S., & Mertens, D. (1998). Advantages and challenges of using inclusive evaluation approaches in evaluation practice. American Journal of Program Evaluation, 19, 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoultz, J., Oneha, M. F., Magnussen, L., Hla, M. M., Bress-Suanders, Z., Dela Cruz, M. D., & Douglas, M. (2006). Finding solutions to challenges faced in community-based participatory research between academic and community organizations. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20, 133–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, P. (2004). Peer support/peer provided services: Underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 392–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1980). The logic of evaluation. Inverness, CA: Edgpress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. (Ed.). (1974). The age of madness. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tefft, B. (1987). Advocacy coalitions as a vehicle for mental health system reform. In E.M. Bennett (Ed.), Social intervention: Theory and practice (pp. 155–185). Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver Randall, K., & Salem, D. A. (2005). Mutual-help groups and recovery: The influence of settings on participants’ experience of recovery. In R. O. Ralph & P. W. Corrigan (Eds.), Recovery in mental illness: Broadening our understanding of wellness (pp. 173–205). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. (1983). The stakeholder approach to evaluation: Origins and promise. In A. S. Bryk (Ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation (Vol. 17, pp. 3–14). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, D. (1984). “On Our Own”: A self-help model. In D. P. Lumsden (Ed.), Community mental health action: Primary prevention programming in Canada (pp. 312–320). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, R. (2001). Mad in America: Bad science, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the mentally ill. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Geoffrey Nelson

  2. Center for Community Based Research, Kitchener, ON, Canada

    Rich Janzen & Joanna Ochocka

  3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, USA

    John Trainor

Authors
  1. Geoffrey Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rich Janzen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joanna Ochocka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Trainor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, E. Nittany Ave. 135, State College, 16801, USA

    Louis D. Brown

  2. Wichita State University, Fairmount, Box 201 1845, Wichita, 67260-0201, USA

    Scott Wituk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, G., Janzen, R., Ochocka, J., Trainor, J. (2010). Participatory Action Research and Evaluation with Mental Health Self-Help Initiatives: A Theoretical Framework. In: Brown, L., Wituk, S. (eds) Mental Health Self-Help. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6253-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation