Skip to main content

Anomaly Detection Characterization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1322 Accesses

Abstract

In Chap. 5, anomaly detection is considered as one type of passive target detection which requires no prior target knowledge. Under this blind environment, a target to be found must be the one that stands out naturally in some sense without appealing for any prior knowledge. In many applications the targets of these types generally appear as anomalies and cannot be identified by visual inspection. This indicates that anomalies are indeed most interesting targets to hyperspectral image analysts because they provide crucial and critical information in data analysis because they are generally unknown and cannot be obtained a priori. Despite the fact that many algorithms are developed for anomaly detection, it is unfortunate that very little effort is devoted to characterization of anomaly detection in terms of several issues: how large is the size for a target to be considered as an anomaly? how strong is it for a target to be considered as an anomaly in response to its surroundings? how sensitive is an anomaly to noise? how far away are two anomalies to be discriminated as separate anomalies? This chapter investigates issues of how to characterize anomalies and also conducts comprehensive computer simulations and experiments to study the effects of such issues in anomaly detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bayliss, J., J.A. Gualtieri, and R.F. Cromp. 1997. Analyzing hyperspectral data with independent component analysis. Proceedings of SPIE 3240: 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I 2003a. Hyperspectral imaging: techniques for spectral detection and classification. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I 2003b. How to effectively utilize information to design hyperspectral target detection and classification algorithms. Workshop in honor of Professor David Landgrebe on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, NASA Goddard Visitor Center, Washington DC, October 27–28, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I 2005. Orthogonal subspace projection revisited: a comprehensive study and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43(3): 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I 2013. Hyperspectral data processing: algorithm design and analysis. New Jersey: Wiley. 2013.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I, H. Ren, and S.S. Chiang. 2001a. Real-time processing algorithms for target detection and classification in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39(4): 760–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I, S.-S. Chiang, and I.W. Ginsberg. 2001b. Anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. SPIE Conference on Geo-Spatial Image and Data Exploitation II, Orlando, Florida, 43–50, 20–24 April, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I, Q. Du, S.-S. Chiang, D. Heinz, and I.W. Ginsberg. 2001c. Unsupervised subpixel target detection in hyperspectral imagery. In SPIE Conference on Algorithms for Multispectral, Hyperspectral and Ultraspectral Imagery VII, Orlando, Florida, 370–379, 20–24 April, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I, H. Ren, Q. Du, S.-S. Chiang, and A. Ifarragurri. 2001d. An ROC analysis for subpixel detection. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Sydney, Australia, July 9–13, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I, and S.-S. Chiang. 2002. Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40(2): 1314–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I, S.S. Chiang, J.A. Smith, and I.W. Ginsberg. 2002. Linear spectral random mixture analysis for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40(2): 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-I, and M. Hsueh. 2006. Characterization of anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery. Sensor Review 26(2):137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C., and C.-I Chang. 1994. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 32(4): 779–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, M. 2004. Adaptive causal anomaly detection, M.S. thesis, Department of computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore county, Baltimore, MD, August 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, M. 2007. Reconfigurable Computing for Algorithms in Hyperspectral Image Processing. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering. University of Maryland Baltimore County. Baltimoore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifarragaerri, A., and C.-I Chang. 2000. Multispectral and hyperspectral image analysis with projection pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38(6): 2529–2538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, S., L. Scharf, and L.T. McWhorter. 2001. Adaptive subspace detector. IEEE Transactions Signal Processing 49(12): 3005–3014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, H., S.Z. Der, and N.M. Nasrabadi. 2003. Adaptive anomaly detection using subspace separation for hyperspectral imagery. Optical Engineering 42(11): 3342–3351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., and C.-I Chang. 2004. A nested spatial window-based approach to target detection for hyperspectral imagery. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Alaska, September 20–24, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolakis, D., and G. Shaw. 2002. Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 19(1): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poor, H.V. 1994. An introduction to detection and estimation theory, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, I.S., and X. Yu. 1990. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing 38(10): 1760–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, D.W., S.G. Beaven, L.E. Hoff, E.M. Winter, A.P. Schaum, and A.D. Stocker. 2002. Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 19(1): 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, T.M. 2000. Unsupervised signature extraction and separation in hyperspectral images: a noise-adjusted fast independent component analysis approach. Optical Engineering 39(4): 897–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chein-I Chang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, CI. (2016). Anomaly Detection Characterization. In: Real-Time Progressive Hyperspectral Image Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6187-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6187-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6186-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6187-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics