Advertisement

Congestion: Its Identification and Management with DEA

  • William W. Cooper
  • Honghui Deng
  • Lawrence M. Seiford
  • Joe ZhuEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 164)

Abstract

Congestion is a term that is applicable in a variety of disciplines which range from medical science to traffic engineering. It has also many uses in practical everyday life. This brings with it a certain looseness in usage. We therefore expand (and refine) our discussion of congestion with reference to its use in economics where we have access to a precise meaning which we can develop in this chapter. This chapter covers the standard approaches used for treating congestion in data envelopment analysis.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis Efficiency Performance Congestion 

References

  1. Balakrishnan R, Soderstrom NS. The cost of system congestion: Evidence from the health care sector. J Manage Account Res. 2000;12:97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brockett PL, Cooper WW, Deng H, Golden LL, Ruefli TW. Using DEA to identify and manage congestion. J Prod Anal. 2004;22(2):207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockett PL, Cooper WW, Shin HC, Wang Y. Inefficiency and congestion in Chinese production before and after the 1978 economic reforms. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1998;32:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnes A, Cooper WW. Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1961.Google Scholar
  5. Cherchye L, Kuosmanen T, Post T. Alternative treatments of congestion in DEA: a rejoinder to Cooper, Gu and Li. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;132:75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper WW, Deng H, Gu B, Li S, Thrall RM. Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese industry (1981–1997). Socioecon Plann Sci. 2001a;35:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper WW, Deng H, Huang Z, Li SX. A one-model approach to the analysis of congestion in Data Envelopment Analysis. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2002a;36:231–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper WW, Deng H, Huang Z, Li SX. Chance Constrained Programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc. 2002b;53:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper WW, Gu B, Li S. Alternative treatments of congestion in DEA: a response to the Cherchye, Kuosmanen and Post critique. Eur J Oper Res. 2001b;132:81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper WW, Gu B, Li S. Comparisons and evaluations of alternative approaches to evaluating congestion in DEA. Eur J Oper Res. 2001c;32(1):1–13.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper WW, Deng H, Huang Z, Li SX. Chance Constrained Programming approaches to congestion in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;155(2):487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper WW, Park KS, Pastor JT. RAM: a range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J Prod Anal. 1999;11:5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. A comprehensive text with uses: data envelopment analysis, example applications, references and DEA-Solver Software. 2nd ed. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J. A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2000;34:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J. Slacks and congestion: a response to comments by Färe and Grosskopf, Socioecon Plann Sci. 2001d;35:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper WW, Thompson RG, Thrall RM. Introduction: extensions and new developments in DEA. Ann Oper Res. 1996;66:3–45.Google Scholar
  17. Deng HH. Congestion and its management in Chinese production. Ph.D. Thesis. The Red McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin: Austin, Texas. Also available from University Microfilms, Inc.: Ann Arbor, MI; 2003.Google Scholar
  18. Färe R, Grosskopf S. Congestion: a note. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1998;33:21–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Färe R, Grosskopf S. Congestion: a response. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2000a;34:35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Färe R, Grosskopf S. Measuring congestion in production. Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie. 1983;43:251–71.Google Scholar
  21. Färe R, Grosskopf S. Slacks and congestion: a comment. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2000b;34:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK. Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  23. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK. The measurement of efficiencies of production. Boston: Kluwer-Nihoff Publishing; 1985.Google Scholar
  24. Färe RS, Svensson L. Congestion of factors of production. Econometrica. 1980;48:1743–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leibenstein H. Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency. Am Econ Rev. 1966;56:392–415.Google Scholar
  26. Leibenstein H. Beyond economic man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1976.Google Scholar
  27. Samuelson PA. Foundations of economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1947.Google Scholar
  28. Seiford LM. References. In: Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, editors. Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publisher: Norwell; 1994.Google Scholar
  29. Stigler GJ. The X-istence of X-efficiency. Am Econ Rev. 1976;66:213–6.Google Scholar
  30. Varian H. Microeconomic analysis. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton, Inc.; 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • William W. Cooper
    • 1
  • Honghui Deng
    • 2
  • Lawrence M. Seiford
    • 3
  • Joe Zhu
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Red McCombs School of BusinessUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.School of BusinessUniversity of NevadaLas VegasUSA
  3. 3.Department of Industrial and Operations EngineeringUniversity of Michigan at Ann ArborAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.School of BusinessWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations