Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis pp 41-70 | Cite as

# Returns to Scale in DEA

## Abstract

This chapter discusses returns to scale (RTS) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The BCC and CCR models described in Chap. 1 of this handbook are treated in input-oriented forms, while the multiplicative model is treated in output-oriented form. (This distinction is not pertinent for the additive model, which simultaneously maximizes outputs and minimizes inputs in the sense of a vector optimization.) Quantitative estimates in the form of scale elasticities are treated in the context of multiplicative models, but the bulk of the discussion is confined to qualitative characterizations such as whether RTS is identified as increasing, decreasing, or constant. This is discussed for each type of model, and relations between the results for the different models are established. The opening section describes and delimits approaches to be examined. The concluding section outlines further opportunities for research and an Appendix discusses other approaches in DEA treatment of RTS.

## Keywords

Data envelopment analysis Efficiency Returns to scale## References

- Banker RD. Estimating most productive scale size using Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1984;17:35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banker RD, Bardhan I, Cooper WW. A note on returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Oper Res. 1996a;88:583–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banker RD, Chang H, Cooper WW. Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1996b;89:473–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banker R, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci. 1984;30:1078–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW, Schinnar A. A bi-extremal principle for Frontier Estimation and Efficiency Evaluation. Manag Sci. 1981;27:1370–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banker RD, Maindiratta A. Piecewise loglinear estimation of efficient production surfaces. Manag Sci. 1986;32:126–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banker RD, Morey R. Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper Res. 1986;34:513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banker RD, Thrall RM. Estimation of returns to scale using Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1992;62:74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Banker, R.D., Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Thrall, R.M. and Zhu, J, Returns to scale in different DEA models, European Journal of Operational Research, 2004;154:345–362.Google Scholar
- Baumol WJ, Panzar JC, Willig RD. Contestable markets. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1982.Google Scholar
- Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2:429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Charnes A, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Stutz J. A multiplicative model for efficiency analysis. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1982;16:213–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Charnes A, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Stutz J. Invariant multiplicative efficiency and piecewise Cobb-Douglas envelopments. Oper Res Lett. 1983;2:101–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cooper WW, Park KS, Pastor JT. RAM: A range adjusted measure of efficiency. J Product Anal. 1999;11:5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, references and DEA-Solver Software applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.Google Scholar
- Cooper WW, Thompson RG, Thrall RM. Extensions and new developments in DEA. Ann Oper Res. 1996;66:3–45.Google Scholar
- Färe R, Grosskopf S. Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis: a comment. Eur J Oper Res. 1994;79:379–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK. The measurement of efficiency of production. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing; 1985.Google Scholar
- Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK. Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
- Førsund FR. On the calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models. J Product Anal. 1996;7:283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frisch RA. Theory of production. Dordrecht: D. Rieoel; 1964.Google Scholar
- Fukuyama H. Returns to scale and scale elasticity in Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2000;125:93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Golany B, Yu G. Estimating returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Oper Res. 1994;103:28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Panzar JC, Willig RD. Economies of scale in multi-output production. Q J Econ. 1977;XLI:481–493.Google Scholar
- Seiford LM, Zhu J. An investigation of returns to scale under Data Envelopment Analysis. Omega. 1999;27:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sueyoshi T. DEA duality on returns to scale (RTS) in production and cost analyses: an occurrence of multiple solutions and differences between production-based and cost-based RTS estimates. Manag Sci. 1999;45:1593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thrall RM. Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Ann Oper Res. 1996a;66:109–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thrall RM. The lack of invariance of optimal dual solutions under translation invariance. Ann Oper Res. 1996b;66:103–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Varian H. Microeconomic analysis. New York: W.W. Norton; 1984.Google Scholar
- Zhu J. Setting scale efficient targets in DEA via returns to scale estimation methods. J Oper Res Soc. 2000;51(3):376–8.Google Scholar
- Zhu J. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. 2nd ed. Boston: Springer Science; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhu J, Shen Z. A discussion of testing DMUs’ returns to scale. Eur J Oper Res. 1995;81:590–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar