Advertisement

Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector

  • Necmi K. AvkiranEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 164)

Abstract

The service sector holds substantial challenges for productivity analysis because most service delivery is often heterogeneous, simultaneous, intangible, and perishable. Nevertheless, the prospects for future studies are promising as we gently push the data envelopment analysis research envelope by using more innovative research designs that may include synergistic partnerships with other methods and disciplines, as well as delve deeper into the sub-DMU network of organizations. This chapter is dedicated to providing a selection of applications in the service sector with a focus on building a conceptual framework, research design, and interpreting results. Given the expanding share of the service sector in gross domestic products of many countries, the twenty-first century will continue to provide fertile grounds for research in the service sector.

Keywords

Universities Hotels Real estate agents Commercial banks Technical and scale inefficiencies Profitability versus inefficiency Network DEA 

References

  1. Adler N, Raveh A. Presenting DEA graphically. OMEGA The Int J Manage Sci. 2008;36:715–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn T, Arnold V, Charnes A, Cooper WW. DEA and ratio efficiency analyses for public institutions of higher learning in Texas. Res Govt Nonprofit Accounting. 1989;5:165–85.Google Scholar
  3. Ahn T, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1988;22(6):259–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahn T, Seiford LM. Sensitivity of DEA models and variable sets in a hypothesis test setting: the efficiency of university operations. In: Ijiri Y, editor. Creative and innovative approaches to the science of management. Wesport: Quorum Books; 1993. p. 191–208.Google Scholar
  5. Ahn T. Efficiency and related issues in higher education: a data envelopment analysis approach. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin; 1987.Google Scholar
  6. Amado CAF, Dyson RG. Exploring the use of DEA for formative evaluation in primary diabetes care: an application to compare English practices. J Oper Res Soc. 2009;60(11):1469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson L, Walberg HJ. Data envelopment analysis. In: Keeves JP, editor. Educational research, methodology, and measurement: an international handbook. Adelaide: Flinders University of South Australia; 1997. p. 498–503.Google Scholar
  8. Andrews L, Aungles P, Baker S, Sarris A. Characteristics and performance of higher education institutions (a preliminary investigation). Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs; 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Avkiran NK. Productivity analysis in the service sector with data envelopment analysis. Brisbane: Avkiran NK; 2006.Google Scholar
  10. Avkiran NK. Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2001;35(1):57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Avkiran NK. Monitoring hotel performance. J Asia Pac Business. 2002;4(1):51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Avkiran NK. Opening the black Box of efficiency analysis: an illustration with UAE banks. OMEGA The Int J Manage Sci. 2009a;37(4):930–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Avkiran NK. Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: an illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data. OMEGA The Int J Manage Sci. 2009b;37(3):535–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Avkiran NK, Thoraneenitiyan N. Purging data before productivity analysis. J Bus Res. 2010;63(3):294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Avkiran NK. The evidence on efficiency gains: the role of mergers and the benefits to the public. J Bank Finance. 1999;23:991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Avkiran NK. Rising productivity of Australian trading banks under deregulation 1986–1995. J Econ Finance. 2000;24:122–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ball SD, Johnson K, Slattery P. Labour productivity in hotels: an empirical analysis. Int J Hospitality Manage. 1986;5(3):141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Banker RD, Thrall RM. Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1992;62:74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Banker RD. Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1984;17:35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Barrow M, Wagstaff A. Efficiency measurement in the public sector: an appraisal. Fisc Stud. 1989;10(1):72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Beasley JE. Comparing university departments. OMEGA The Int J Manage Sci. 1990;18(2):171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bhattacharyya A, Lovell CAK, Sahay P. The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98:332–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Birch S, Maynard A. Performance indicators and performance assessment in the UK national health service: implications for management and planning. Int J Health Manage. 1986;1:143–56.Google Scholar
  24. Breu TM, Raab RL. Efficiency and Perceived Quality of the Nation's top 25 National Universities and National Liberal Arts Colleges: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Higher Education. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1994;28(1):33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brockett PL, Charnes A, Cooper WW, Huang ZM, Sun DB. Data transformations in DEA cone ratio envelopment approaches for monitoring bank performances. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;98:250–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Business Queensland. Brisbane: Business Queensland Book of Lists; 1997.Google Scholar
  27. Butterfield RW. A quality strategy for service organizations. Qual Prog. 1987;20(12):40–2.Google Scholar
  28. Cave M, Hanney S, Kogan M. The Use of performance indicators in higher education: a critical analysis of developing practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1991.Google Scholar
  29. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Huang ZM, Sun DB. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J Econom. 1990;46:73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2:429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen Y. Ranking efficient units in DEA. OMEGA The Int J Manage Sci. 2004;32:213–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Coelli T, Rao DSP, Battese GE. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. DEETYA. The composite index: allocation of the research quantum to Australian universities. Canberra: Research Branch, Higher Education Division; 1997.Google Scholar
  34. Denton GA, White B. Implementing a balanced-scorecard approach to managing hotel operations. Cornell Hotel Restaur Adm Q. 2000;41(1):94–107.Google Scholar
  35. Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;132:245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dyson RG, Thanassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc. 1988;39(6):563–76.Google Scholar
  37. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Whittaker G. Network DEA. In: Zhu J, Cook WD, editors. Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. New York: Springer Science Business Media; 2007.Google Scholar
  38. Färe R, Grosskopf S. Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.Google Scholar
  39. Färe R, Grosskopf S. Network DEA. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2000;34:35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Flynn N. Performance measurement in public sector services. Policy Polit. 1986;14(3):389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Geller AN. Tracking the critical success factors for hotel companies. Cornell Hotel Restaur Adm Q. 1985;25(4):76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gillen D, Lall A. Developing measures of airport productivity and performance: an application of data envelopment analysis. Transp Res E. 1997;33(4):261–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guerrier Y, Lockwood AJ. Work flexibility in hotels. In: Johnston R, editors. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the Operations Management Association. Warwick: University of Warwick; 1988. Pp. 351–365.Google Scholar
  44. Haywood KM. Assessing the quality of hospitality services. Int J Hospitality Manage. 1983;2(4):165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnes G. Research performance indications in the university sector. High Edu Quart. 1988;42(1):54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnes J. Performance assessment in higher education in Britain. Eur J Oper Res. 1996;89:18–33.Google Scholar
  47. Johns N, Wheeler K. Productivity and performance measurement and monitoring. In: Teare R, Boer A, editors. Strategic hospitality management. London: Cassell; 1991. p. 45–71.Google Scholar
  48. Jones P. Quality, capacity and productivity in service industries. Int J Hospitality Manage. 1988;7(2):104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leightner JE, Lovell CAK. The impact of financial liberalization on the performance of Thai banks. J Econ Bus. 1998;50:115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lewis HF, Sexton TR. Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Comput Oper Res. 2004;31:1365–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lindsay AW. Institutional performance in higher education: the efficiency dimension. Rev Educ Res. 1982;52(2):175–99.Google Scholar
  52. Mclaughlin CP, Coffey S. Measuring productivity in services. In: Lovelock CH, editor. Managing services: marketing, operations, and human resources. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1992. p. 103–17.Google Scholar
  53. Messenger SJ, Mugomeza C. An exploratory study of productivity and performance measurement in Zimbabwean hotels. Int J Contemp Hospit Manag. 1995;7(5):V–VII.Google Scholar
  54. Mill RC. Productivity in service organisations. In: Jones P, editor. Management in service industries. London: Pitman; 1989. p. 275–88.Google Scholar
  55. Miller SM, Noulas AG. The technical efficiency of large bank production. J Bank Finance. 1996;20:495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morita H, Hirokawa K, Zhu J. A slack-based measure of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis. OMEGA The Int J Manage Sci. 2005;33:357–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nunamaker TR. Using data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of Non-profit organizations: a critical evaluation. Managerial Decis Econom. 1985;6(1):50–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olsen M, Crawford-Welch S, Tse E. The Global hospitality industry of the 1990s. In: Teare R, Boer A, editors. Strategic hospitality management. London: Cassell; 1991. p. 213–26.Google Scholar
  59. REIQ (Real Estate Institute of Queensland). Queensland residential real estate agency practice profitability report 1992/93; 1994.Google Scholar
  60. Renaghan LM. A new marketing Mix for the hospitality industry. Cornell Hotel Restaur Adm Q. 1981;22(2):31–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sandler M. Productivity Measurement and Improvement in the Hospitality Industry. In: Pizam A et al., editors. The practice of hospitality management. Connecticut: AVI Publishing Co.; 1982. p. 153–64.Google Scholar
  62. Schroeder RG. Operations management: decision making in the operations function. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1985.Google Scholar
  63. Sealey Jr CW, Lindley JT. Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. J Finance. 1977;32:1251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma KR, Leung P, Chen HL. Economic efficiency and optimum stocking densities in fish polyculture: an application of data envelopment analysis (DEA) to Chinese fish farms. Aquaculture. 1999;180(3–4):207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sherman HD, Zhu J. Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: evidence from a U.S. Bank application. Ann Oper Res. 2006;145:301–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sherman HD. Service organization productivity management. Hamilton: The Society of Management Accountants of Canada; 1988.Google Scholar
  67. Solomons D. Divisional performance: measurement and control. Homewood: R D Irwin; 1968.Google Scholar
  68. Sturm JE, Williams B. Foreign banks entry deregulation and bank efficiency: lessons from the Australian experience. J Bank Finance. 2004;28:1775–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas JA. The productive school: a system analysis approach to educational administration. New York: Wiley; 1974.Google Scholar
  70. Tomkins C, Green R. An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financ Accountability and Manage. 1988;4(2):147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. tone K, Tsutsui M. Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;197:243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;130:498–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vitikainen K, Street A, Linna M. Estimation of hospital efficiency – do different definitions and casemix measures for hospital output affect the results? Health Policy. 2009;89(2):149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Witt CA, Witt SF. Why productivity in the hotel sector is low. J Contem Hospitality Manage. 1989;1(2):28–34.Google Scholar
  75. Witt SF, Moutinho L. Tourism marketing and management handbook. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall; 1994.Google Scholar
  76. Wong YHB, Beasley JE. Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc. 1990;41(9):829–35.Google Scholar
  77. Yeh QJ. The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. J Oper Res Soc. 1996;47:980–8.Google Scholar
  78. Yue P. Data envelopment analysis and commercial bank performance: a primer with applications to Missouri banks. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Rev. 1992;74:31–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UQ Business SchoolThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations