Dynamic Origin–Destination Matrix Estimation Using Probe Vehicle Data as A Priori Information

  • Rúna Ásmundsdóttir
  • Yusen Chen
  • Henk J. van Zuylen
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 144)

Abstract

For most Origin–Destination (OD) matrix estimation methods, a priori information in the form of a matrix (so-called a priori matrix) is necessary as an initial guess. In the estimation process, this matrix is updated with traffic counts until a final estimated matrix has been found. The more this a priori matrix matches the real matrix, the better the final outcome of the estimation will be.

Keywords

Lost 

References

  1. Ásmundsdóttir R (2008) Dynamic OD matrix estimation using floating car data. M. Sc thesis, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  2. Ban X, Li Y, Skabardonis A (2007) Local MAD method for floating car data processing. Proceedings of 14th world congress on intelligent transport systems, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockfeld E, Passfeld B, Wagner P (2007) Validating travel times calculated on the basis of taxi floating car data with test drivers. Proceedings of 14th world congress on intelligent transport systems, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  4. Caceres N, Wideberg JP, Benitez FG (2007) Deriving origin–destination data from a mobile phone network, IET intelligent transportation systems 11, 15–26, 2007. The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2007Google Scholar
  5. Chen YS (1993–2008) REMDOE – a dynamic OD estimator, Software manualGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen YS, Van Zuylen HJ et al (2007) Chengdu feasibility study for traffic information and route guidance, project reportGoogle Scholar
  7. Coëmet M, De Hoog A, Taale H, Zijderhand F (1999) Floating car data, final report for roads to the future. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  8. Hamerslag R, Taale H (2001) Deriving road networks from floating car data. 9th world conference on transport research, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  9. Krygsman SC, Schmitz P (2005) The use of cellphone technology in activity and travel data collection. The 24th annual Southern African transport conference, 11–13 July 2005Google Scholar
  10. Krygsman S, Nel J, de Jong T (2008) Deriving transport data with cellphones: methodological lessons from South Africa. 8th international conference on survey methods in transport: harmonisation and data comparability, Annecy, France, 25–31 MayGoogle Scholar
  11. Taale H, De Hoog A, Smulders SA, Tool O (2000) The results of a Dutch experiment with floating car data. 9th IFAC symposium on control in transportation systems, Braunschweig, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. Torp K, Lahrmann H (2005) Floating cat data for traffic monitoring. 5th European congress and exhibition of intelligent transport systems and services, Hannover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Zuylen HJ (1981) Some improvements in the estimation of an OD matrix from traffic counts. Proceedings of 8th international symposium on transportation and traffic theory, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Zuylen HJ, Van Lint JWC, Hoogendoorn SP, Bliemer M, Muller THJ, Chen YS, Taale H, Zuurbier F (2006) ITS and dynamic traffic management, lecture notes, code CT5804, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  15. Wen H, Chen F (2007) The application of floating car system in Beijing. Proceedings of 14th world congress on intelligent transport systems, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  16. Zajicek J, Reinthaler M (2007) Real time route analysis based on floating car technology. Proceedings of 14th world congress on intelligent transport systems, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rúna Ásmundsdóttir
  • Yusen Chen
    • 1
  • Henk J. van Zuylen
  1. 1.CYStoneRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations