Polynomial Equations

  • John StillwellEmail author
Part of the Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics book series (UTM)


The first phase in the history of algebra was the search for solutions of polynomial equations. The “degree of difficulty” of an equation corresponds rather neatly to the degree of the corresponding polynomial. Linear equations are easily solved, and 2000 years ago the Chinese were even able to solve n equations in n unknowns by the method we now call “Gaussian elimination.” Quadratic equations are harder to solve, because they generally require the square root operation. But the solution—essentially the same as that taught in high schools today—was discovered independently in many cultures more than 1000 years ago. The first really hard case is the cubic equation, whose solution requires both square roots and cube roots. Its discovery by Italian mathematicians in the early 16th century was a decisive breakthrough, and equations quickly became the language of virtually all mathematics. (See, for example, analytic geometry in Chapter 7 and calculus in Chapter 9.) Despite this breakthrough, the problem of polynomial equations remained incompletely solved. The obstacle was the quintic equation—the general equation of degree 5. In the 1820s it finally became clear that the quintic equation is not solvable in the sense that equations of lower degree are solvable. But explaining why this is so requires a new, and more abstract, concept of algebra (see Chapter 19).


Quadratic Equation Polynomial Equation Chinese Mathematician General Quadratic Equation Biographical Note 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boyer, C. B. (1968). A History of Mathematics. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Crossley, J. N. (1987). The Emergence of Number, 2nd ed. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. David, F. N. (1962). Games, Gods and Gambling. London: Charles Griffin.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Kac, M. (1984). How I became a mathematician. American Scientist 72, 498–499.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Kahn, D. (1967). The Codebreakers. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  6. Li, Y. and S. R. Du (1987). Chinese Mathematics: A Concise History. New York: The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press. Translated from the Chinese and with a preface by John N. Crossley and Anthony W.-C. Lun. With a foreword by Joseph Needham.Google Scholar
  7. Ore, O. (1953). Cardano, the gambling scholar. With a translation from the Latin of Cardano’s “Book on games of chance,” by S. H. Gould. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Schneider, I. (1968). Der Mathematiker Abraham de Moivre (1667–1754). Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 5, 177–317.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shen, K.-S., J. N. Crossley, and W.-C. Lun (1999). The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art. Companion and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Turnbull, H. W. (1960). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Vol. II: 1676–1687. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Wantzel, P. L. (1837). Recherches sur les moyens de reconnaitre si un problème de géométrie peut se resoudre avec la règle et le compas. J. Math. 2, 366–372.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations