Mathematics and Its History pp 553-588 | Cite as

# Combinatorics

## Preview

In this final chapter we look at another field that came to maturity in the 20th century: combinatorics. Like number theory before the 19th century, combinatorics before the 20th century was thought to be an elementary topic without much unity or depth. We now realize that, like number theory, combinatorics is infinitely deep and linked to all parts of mathematics. Here we emphasize the parts that link nicely to topics from earlier chapters, but without completely sacrificing the distinctive features of the subject. Combinatorics is often called “finite mathematics” because it studies finite objects. But there are infinitely many finite objects, and it is sometimes convenient to reason about all members of an infinite collection at once. In fact, combinatorics pioneered this idea with the use of *generating functions* (already seen in Section 10.6). Other important infinite principles in combinatorics are the *infinite pigeonhole principle* and the *Kőnig infinity lemma*. We illustrate these first by some classical proofs in number theory and analysis, then in the 20thcentury fields of *graph theory* and *Ramsey theory*. Ramsey theory leads us to a proof of the Paris–Harrington theorem, mentioned in Section 24.8 as a theorem that *cannot* be proved in the strictly finite reasoning of PA. Infinite reasoning is likewise essential for graph theory. The field had its origins in topology, and it is still relevant there, but it has expanded extraordinarily far in other directions. Graph theory today is exploring the boundaries of finite provability first exposed by Gödel’s incompleteness theorem.

## Keywords

Petersen Graph Peano Arithmetic Pigeonhole Principle Blue Edge Prime Number Theorem## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Ackermann, W. F. (1937). Der Widerspruchsfreiheit der allgemeine Mengenlehre.
*Math. Ann.**112*, 305–315.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Appel, K. and W. Haken (1976). Every planar map is four colorable.
*Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.**82*, 711–712.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Diestel, R. (2005).
*Graph Theory*(Third ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Graham, R. L., B. L. Rothschild, and J. H. Spencer (1990).
*Ramsey Theory*(Second ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Hadamard, J. (1896). Sur la distribution des zéros de la fonction ζ(
*s*) et ses conséquences arithmétiques.*Bull. Soc. Math. France**24*, 199–220.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Jordan, C. (1887).
*Cours de Analyse de l’École Polytechnique*. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Kruskal, J. B. (1960). Well-quasi-ordering, the tree theorem, and Vazsonyi’s conjecture.
*Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.**95*, 210–225.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Kuratowski, K. (1930). Sur le problème des courbes gauches en topologie.
*Fundamenta Mathematicae**15*, 271–283.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Ramsey, F. P. (1929). On a problem of formal logic.
*Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.**30*, 291–310.Google Scholar - Schechter, B. (1998).
*My Brain Is Open*. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar - Soifer, A. (2009).
*The Mathematical Coloring Book*. New York: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Sperner, E. (1928). Neuer Beweis für die Invarianz der Dimensionzahl und des Gebietes.
*Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg**6*, 265–272.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Veblen, O. (1905). Theory of plane curves in nonmetrical analysis situs.
*Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.**6*, 83–98.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Wagner, K. W. (1936). Bemerkungen zum Vierfarbenproblem.
*Jahresber. Deutsch. Math.-Ver.**46*, 26–32.Google Scholar - Wagner, K. W. (1937). Über eine Eigenschaft der ebenen Komplexe.
*Math. Ann.**114*, 570–590.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar