Skip to main content

Intravascular Imaging

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1331 Accesses

Abstract

Intravascular imaging is developing as the fourth modality for ­cardiovascular physicians and scientists. For diagnostic purposes, traditional ultrasound imaging has been augmented with cross-sectional imaging by CT and MR scans. Conventional angiography is a necessary and invasive tool to deliver interventions but lacks the ability to examine flow and the vessel wall. Intravascular imaging by intravascular ultrasound provides this dimensional shift during angiography and enhances diagnosis and therapeutics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ramaswami G, Tegos T, Nicolaides AN, Dhanjil S, Griffin M, Al-Kutoubi A, Belcaro G, Lewis JB, Wilkins R, Davies MJ (1999) Ultrasonic plaque character and outcome after lower limb angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 29:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marks NA, Ascher E, Hingorani AP, Shiferson A, Puggioni A (2008) Gray-scale median of the atherosclerotic plaque can predict success of lumen re-entry during subintimal femoral-popliteal angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 47:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Met R, Bipat S, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Koelemay MJ (2009) Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301:415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Kock MC, Hunink MG (2007) Lower extremity arterial disease: ­multidetector CT angiography meta-analysis. Radiology 245:433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mell M, Tefera G, Thornton F, Siepman D, Turnipseed W (2007) Clinical utility of time-­resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 45:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huegli RW, Thalhammer C, Jacob AL, Jaeger K, Bilecen D (2008) Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Eur J Radiol 66:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins R, Cranny G, Burch J, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Craig D, Wright K, Berry E, Gough M, Kleijnen J, Westwood M (2007) A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Health Technol Assess 11:iii–iv, xi–xiii, 1–184

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zimmermann GG, Peter Erhart P, Schneider J, Schulthess GK, Schmidt M, Debatin JE (1997) Intravascular MR imaging of atherosclerotic plaque: ex vivo analysis of human femoral ­arteries with histologic correlation. Radiology 204:769–774

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kashyap VS, Pavkov ML, Bishop PD, Nassoiy SP, Eagleton MJ, Clair DG, Ouriel K (2008) Angiography underestimates peripheral atherosclerosis: lumenography revisited. J Endovasc Ther 15:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawano T, Honye J, Takayama T, Yokoyama S, Chiku M, Ando H, Endo M, Ichikawa M, Ishii N, Watanabe Y, Watanabe I, Saito S (2008) Compositional analysis of angioscopic ­yellow plaques with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data. Int J Cardiol 125:74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bishop PD, Feiten LE, Ouriel K, Nassoiy SP, Pavkov ML, Clair D, Kashyap VS (2008) Arterial calcification increases in distal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Ann Vasc Surg 22:799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gussenhoven EJ, vanderLugt A, Pasterkamp G, vanderBerg FG, Sie LH, Vischjager M, The SH, Li W, Pieterman H, vanUrk H (1995) Intravascular ultrasound predictors of outcome after peripheral balloon angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 10:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vogt KC, Just S, Rasmussen JG, Schroeder TV (1997) Prediction of outcome after femoropopliteal balloon angioplasty by IVUS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 13:563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Lugt A, Gussenhoven EJ, Pasterkamp G, Stijnen T, Reekers JA, van der Berg FG, Tielbeek AV, Seelen JL, Pieterman H (1998) Intravascular ultrasound predictor of restenosis after balloon angioplasty of the femoropopliteal artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 16:110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spijkerboer AM, Nass PC, deValois JC, vanderGraaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP (1996) Evaluation of femoropopliteal arteries with duplex ultrasound after angioplasty, Can we ­predict results at one year? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 12:418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Lankeren W, Gussenhoven EJ, Honkoop J, Stijnen T, van Overhagen H, Wittens CHA, Kranendonk SE, van Sambeek MRHM, van der Lugt A (1999) Plaque area increase and ­vascular remodeling contribute to lumen area change after PTA of the femoropopliteal artery: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Vasc Surg 29(3):430–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Capek P, McLean GK, Berkowitz HD (1991) Femoropopliteal angioplasty. Factors influencing long-term success. Circulation 83:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hunink MG, Donaldson MC, Meyerovitz MF, Polak JF, Whittemore AD, Kandarpa K, Grassi CJ, Aruny J, Harrington DP, Mannick JA (1993) Risks and benefits of femoropopliteal ­percutaneous balloon angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 17:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blair JM, Gewertz BL, Moosa H, Lu C-T, Zarins CK (1989) PTA versus surgery for limb threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg 9:698–703

    Google Scholar 

  20. Milford MA, Weaver FA, Lundell CJ et al (1988) Femoropopliteal PTA for limb salvage. J Vasc Surg 8:292–299

    Google Scholar 

  21. Treiman GS, Ichikawa L, Treiman RL, Cohen JL, Cossman DV, Wagner WH, Levin PM, Foran RF (1994) Treatment of recurrent femoral or popliteal artery stenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 20:577–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson SE, Wold GL, Cross AP (1989) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus ­operation for peripheral atherosclerosis: report of a prospective randomized trial in a selected group of patients. J Vasc Surg 9:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  23. Armstrong MW, Torrie EP, Galland RB (1992) Consequences of immediate failure of ­percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  24. Galaria II, Surowiec SM, Rhodes JM, Illig KA, Shortell CK, Davies MG (2005) Implications of early failure of superficial femoral artery endoluminal interventions. Ann Vasc Surg 19(6):787–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tatò F, Hoffmann U, Weber C, Reiser M, Rieger J (2006) Comparison of angiography. duplex sonography and intravascular ultrasound for the graduation of femoropopliteal stenoses before and after balloon angioplasty. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1837–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yabushita H, Bouma BE, Houser SL, Aretz HT, Jang I-K, Schlendorf KH, Kauffman CR, Shishkov M, Kang D-H, Halpern EF, Tearney GJ (2002) Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 106:1540–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jang I-K, Bouma BE, Kang D-H, Park S-J, Park S-W, Seung K-B, Choi K-B, Shishkov M, Schlendorf K, Pomerantsev E, Houser SL, Aretz HT, Tearney GJ (2002) Visualization of ­coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:604–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schaar JA, de Korte CL, Mastik F, van Damme LC, Krams R, Serruys PW, van der Steen AF (2005) Three-dimensional palpography of human coronary arteries. Ex vivo validation and in-patient evaluation. Herz 30:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaar JA, van der Steen AF, Mastik F, Baldewsing RA, Serruys PW (2006) Intravascular palpography for vulnerable plaque assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:C86–C91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L (2007) Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:839–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Morishima T, Chikamori T, Hatano T, Tanaka N, Takazawa K, Yamashina A (2004) Correlation between myocardial uptake of technetium-99m-sestamibi and pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve. J Cardiol 43:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW (2007) van’t Veer M, Bär F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Samady H, McDaniel M, Veledar E, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Vaccarino V (2009) Baseline fractional flow reserve and stent diameter predict optimal post-stent fractional flow reserve and major adverse cardiac events after bare-metal stent deployment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Van’ t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF, FAME Study Investigators (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Den Heijer P, Foley DP, Hillege H (1994) The “Ermenonville” classification of observations at coronary angioscopy: evaluation of intra- and inter-observer agreement. Eur Heart J 15:815

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thieme T, Wernecke KD, Meyer R (1996) Angioscopic evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques: validation by histomorphologic analysis and association with stable and unstable coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Den Heijer P, Dijk RB, Hillege HL (1994) Serial angioscopic and angiographic observations during the first hour after successful coronary angioplasty: a preamble to a multicenter trial addressing angioscopic markers of restenosis. Am Heart J 128:656–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kanamasa K, Ishikawa K (2002) Haziness on coronary angiogram after percutaneous ­transluminal coronary angioplasty evaluated with angioscopy. Angiology 53:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sakatani H, Degawa T, Nakamura M (1999) Intracoronary surface changes after Palmar–Schatz stent implantation: serial observations with coronary angioscopy. Am Heart J 138:962–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ueda Y, Nanto S, Komamura K (1994) Neointimal coverage of stents in coronary arteries observed by angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sassower M, Abela GS, Kock MC (1993) Angioscopic evaluation of periprocedural and ­postprocedural abrupt closure after percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 126:444–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. White C, Ramee S, Collins T (1995) Coronary angioscopy of abrupt occlusion after ­angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1681–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. van Ooijen PMA, de Jonge G, Oudkerk M (2007) Coronary fly-through or virtual angioscopy using dual-source MDCT data. Eur Radiol 17:2852–2859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Voigt JU (2009) Ultrasound molecular imaging. Methods 48:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ferrara KW, Borden MA, Zhang H (2009) Lipid-shelled vehicles: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. Acc Chem Res 42:881–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Villanueva FS (2008) Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease using ultrasound. J Nucl Cardiol 15:576–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daynene Vykoukal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vykoukal, D., Davies, M.G. (2011). Intravascular Imaging. In: Davies, M., Lumsden, A., Kline, W., Kakadiaris, I. (eds) Pumps and Pipes. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6012-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6012-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6011-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6012-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics