Skip to main content

Permutation Tests and the Bootstrap

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Numerical Analysis for Statisticians

Part of the book series: Statistics and Computing ((SCO))

  • 8238 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss two techniques, permutation testing and the bootstrap, of immense practical value. Both techniques involve random resampling of observed data and liberate statisticians from dubious model assumptions and large sample requirements. Both techniques initially met with considerable intellectual resistance. The notion that one can conduct hypothesis tests or learn something useful about the properties of estimators and confidence intervals by resampling data was alien to most statisticians of the past. The computational demands of permutation testing and bootstrapping alone made them unthinkable. These philosophical and practical objections began to crumble with the advent of modern computing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babu GJ, Singh K (1984) On a one term Edgeworth correction for Efron’s bootstrap. Sankhya A 46:219-232

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bickel PJ, Freedman DA (1981) Some asymptotics for the bootstrap. Ann Stat 9:1196-1217

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley JV (1968). Distribution-Free Statistical Tests. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Davison AC (1988) Discussion of papers by DV Hinkley and TJ DiCi- ccio and JP Romano. J Roy Stat Soc B 50:356-357

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davison AC, Hinkley DV, Schechtman E (1986) Efficient bootstrap simulation. Biometrika 73:555-566

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1-26

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Efron B (1987) Better bootstrap confidence intervals (with discussion). J Amer Stat Assoc 82:171-200

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ernst MD (2004) Permutation methods. Stat Sci 19:676-685

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher RA (1935) The Design of Experiments. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Givens GH, Hoeting JA (2005) Computational Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gleason JR (1988) Algorithms for balanced bootstrap simulations. Amer Statistician 42:263-266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grogan WL, Wirth WW (1981) A new American genus of predaceous midges related to Palpomyia and Bezzia (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Proc Biol Soc Wash 94:1279-1305

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hall P (1989) Antithetic resampling for the bootstrap. Biometrika 76:713-724

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hall P (1992) The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johns MV Jr (1988) Importance sampling for bootstrap confidence intervals. J Amer Stat Assoc 83:709-714

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lazzeroni LC, Lange K (1997) Markov chains for Monte Carlo tests of genetic equilibrium in multidimensional contingency tables. Ann Stat 25:138-168

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ludbrook J, Dudley H (1998) Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research. Amer Statistician 52:127-132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nijenhuis A, Wilf HS (1978) Combinatorial Algorithms for Computers and Calculators, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Peressini AL, Sullivan FE, Uhl JJ Jr (1988) The Mathematics of Nonlinear Programming. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Pitman EJG (1937) Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. J Roy Stat Soc Suppl 4:119-130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pitman EJG (1937) Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. II. The correlation coefficient test. J Roy Stat Soc Suppl 4:225-232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pitman EJG (1938) Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. III. The analysis of variance test. Biometrika 29:322-335

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Quenouille M (1949) Approximate tests of correlation in time series. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 11:18-44

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Serfling RJ (1980) Approximation Theorems in Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Shao J, Tu D (1995) The Jackknife and Bootstrap. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Snee RD (1974) Graphical display of two-way contingency tables. Amer Statistician 38:9-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tukey JW (1958) Bias and confidence in not quite large samples. (Abstract) Ann Math Stat 29:614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Lange .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lange, K. (2010). Permutation Tests and the Bootstrap. In: Numerical Analysis for Statisticians. Statistics and Computing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5945-4_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics