Abstract
Historically, approaches to the promotion of population health have been based on a deficit model. That is, they tend to focus on identifying the problems and needs of populations that require professional resources and high levels of dependence on hospital and welfare services. These deficit models are important and necessary to identify levels of needs and priorities. But they need to be complemented by some other perspectives as they have some drawbacks. Deficit models tend to define communities and individuals in negative terms, disregarding what is positive and works well in particular populations. In contrast, “asset” models tend to accentuate positive capability to identify problems and activate solutions. They focus on promoting salutogenic resources that promote the self-esteem and coping abilities of individuals and communities, eventually leading to less dependency on professional services. Much of the evidence available to policy makers to inform decisions about the most effective approaches to promoting health and to tackling health inequities is based on a deficit model. This may disproportionately lead to policies and practices which disempower the populations and communities who are supposed to benefit from them. An assets approach to health and development embraces a “salutogenic” notion of health creation and in doing so encourages the full participation of local communities in the health development process. The asset model presented here aims to revitalise how policy makers, researchers and practitioners think and act to promote a more resourceful approach to tackling health inequities. The model outlines a systematic approach to asset based public health which can provide scientific evidence and best practice on how to maximise the stock of key assets necessary for promoting health. Redressing the balance between the assets and deficit models for evidence-based public health could help us to unlock some of the existing barriers to effective action on health inequities. This re-balancing would help in better understanding the factors that influence health and what can be done about them. It would promote a positive and inclusive approach to action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acheson, D. (1998). Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report. London: The Stationery Office.
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International vol 11, no 1, 11–18.
Bartley, M., (Ed.) (2006). Capability and resilience: beating the odds. UCL., London: University College London. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/capabilityandresilience/beatingtheoddsbook.pdf cited May 2009.
Bauer, G., Davies, J. K., & Pelakin, J. (2006). The EUHPID health development model for the classification of public health indicators. Health Promotion International vol 21, no 2, 153–159.
Department of Health. (2003). Tackling health inequalities: a programme for action. London: Department of Health.
Exworthy, M., Berney, L., & Powell, M. (2002). How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally’: the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities. Policy and Politics vol 30, no 1, 79–96.
Exworthy, M., Blane, D., & Marmot, M. (2003). Tackling health inequalities in the United Kingdom: the progress and pitfalls of policy. Health Services Research vol 38, 1905–1922.
Guy, T., Fuller, D., & Pletsch, C. (2002). Asset mapping: A handbook. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Rural Partnership.
Harrison, D., Ziglio, E., Levin, L., & Morgan, A. (2004). Assets for health and development: developing a conceptual framework. European Office for Investment for Health and Development, London: World Health Organization.
Hills, D. (2004). Evaluation of community levels interventions for health improvement: a review of experience in the UK. Venice: Health Development Agency.
Hunter, D., & Killoran, A. (2004). Tackling health inequalities: turning policy into practice. London: Health Development Agency.
IUHPE. (2000). The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: Shaping public health in a new Europe. A report for the European Commission ECSC-EC –EXEC, Brussels. Paris: Jouve Composition & Impression.
Jordan, C., Dowswell, T., Harrison, S., Lilford, R., & Mort, M. (1998). Whose priorities? Listening to users and the public. British Medical Journal vol 316, 1668–1670.
Judd, J., Frankish, J., & Moulton, G. (2001). Setting standards in the evaluation of community based health promotion programmes – a unifying approach. Health Promotion International, vol 16, no 4, 367–379.
Judge, K., Platt, S., Costongs, C., and Jurczak, K. (2006). Health inequalities: a challenge for Europe. An independent expert report commissioned by the UK Presidency of the EU. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/socio_economics/documents/ev_060302_rd05_en.pdf cited May 2009.
Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income and inequality. American Journal of Public Health, vol 87, 1491–1498.
King, A. (2000). The New Zealand health strategy. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
Koelen, M., Vaandrager, L., & Colomér, C. (2001). Health promotion research: dilemmas and challenges. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health vol 55, 257–262.
Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: a path towards building and mobilising a community’s assets. Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research.
Lindström, B., & Eriksson, M. (2005). Salutogenesis – a glossary. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health vol 59, 440–442.
Lindström, B., & Eriksson, M. (2006). Contextualising salutogenesis and Antonovsky in public health development. Health Promotion International vol 212, no 3, 238–244.
Marmot, M. G., Davey Smith, G., Stansfield, S., Patel, C., North, F., Head, J., White, I., Brunner, E., & Feeney, A. (1991). Health inequalities among British civil servants; the Whitehall II study. Lancet vol 337, 1387–1393.
Mackenbach, J. P., & Bakker, M. J. (2002). Reducing inequalities in health: the European perspective. London: Routledge.
McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society: community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books.
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. (2003). National public health strategy for Sweden. Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
Morgan, A., & Ziglio, E. (2006). Foreword. In Capability and resilience: beating the odds. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, London: University College London.
Morgan, A., & Popay, J. (2007). Community participation for health. Reducing health inequalities and building social capital. In Scriven, A., & Garman, S., Public health: social context and action. London: Open University Press.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
Putnam, R. (1995). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Savedoff, W., Levine, R., & Birdsall, N. (2006). When will we ever learn? Improving lives through impact evaluation Report of the Evaluation Gap Working Group. Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development.
Stahl, T., Wismar, W., Ollila, E., Lahtinen, E., & Leppo, K. (Eds.) (2006). Health in all policies: prospects and potentials. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. http://www.euro.who.int/observatory/Publications/20060915_2 cited May 2009.
Whitehead, M., Petticrew, M., Graham, H., Macintyre, S., Bambra, C., & Egan, M. (2004). Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 2: Assembling the evidence jigsaw. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health vol 58, 817–821.
Whitehead, M., & Dahlgren, G. (2006). Levelling up (part 1): a discussion paper on concepts and principles for tackling social inequalities in health. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.
Wimbush, E., & Watson, J. (2000). An evaluation framework for health promotion: theory, quality and effectiveness. Evaluation, vol 6, no 3, 301–321.
Woodward, A., & Kawachi, I. (2000). Why reduce health inequalities? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health vol 54, 923–929.
WHO. (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. The Move Toward A New Public Health, Ottawa 17–21 November 1986. World Health Organization.
WHO. (2003). Millennium development goals. WHO’s contribution to tracing progress and measuring achievements. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO. (2005). Towards a conceptual framework for analysis and action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Ziglio, E., Hagard, S., & Griffiths, J. (2000). Health promotion development in Europe: achievements and challenges. Health Promotion International, vol 15, no 2, 143–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morgan, A., Ziglio, E. (2010). Revitalising the Public Health Evidence Base: An Asset Model. In: Morgan, A., Davies, M., Ziglio, E. (eds) Health Assets in a Global Context. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5921-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5921-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5920-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5921-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)